Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of dexamphetamine on simulated driving performance

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

The number of road fatalities related to the presence of amphetamines in drivers has been relatively constant over the past 10 years. However, there remains uncertainty as to the extent that these drugs induce driving impairment, and whether any such impairments translate to an increase in road fatalities.

Objectives

To examine the acute effects of 0.42 mg/kg dexamphetamine on simulated driving performance, and to establish which, if any, simulated driving abilities become impaired following dexamphetamine administration.

Methods

A repeated-measures, counter-balanced, double-blind, placebo-controlled design was employed. Twenty healthy volunteers completed two treatment conditions—0.42 mg/kg dexamphetamine and placebo. Performance was assessed using a driving simulator task. Blood and saliva samples were obtained prior to the driving tasks and immediately after task completion (120 min and 170 min post-drug administration, respectively).

Results

Mean dexamphetamine blood concentrations were 83 ng/ml and 98 ng/ml at 120 min and 170 min, respectively. Results indicated a decrease in overall simulated driving ability following dexamphetamine administration during the day-time but not the night-time scenario tasks. Contributing to this performance reduction, “incorrect signalling”, “failing to stop at a red traffic light” and “slow reaction times” were the behaviours most strongly affected by dexamphetamine.

Conclusions

The decrease in simulated driving ability observed during the day-time driving tasks are consistent with the perceptual narrowing or tunnel vision that is associated with dexamphetamine consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adachi-Usami E (1990) Senescence of visual function as studied by visually evoked cortical potentials. Jpn J Ophthalmol 34(1):81–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Angrist B, Corwin J, Bartlik B, Cooper T (1987) Early pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of oral d-amphetamine in normal subjects. Biol Psychiatry 22:1357–1368

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauer LH, Ambre J, de Wit H (1996) Acute tolerance to subjective but not cardiovascular effects of d-amphetamine in normal healthy men. J Clin Psychopharmacol 16(1):72–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brookhuis KA, De Waard D et al (2004) Effects of MDMA (ecstasy), and multiple drugs use on (simulated) driving performance and traffic safety. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 173(3–4):440–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cami J, Farre M, Mas M, Roset P, Poudevida S, Mas A, San L, de la Torre R (2000) Human pharmacology of 3, 4-methylenedioxymeth-amphetamine (“Ecstasy”): psychomotor performance and subjective effects. J Clin Psychopharmacol 20(4):455–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Waard D, Brookhuis KA, Pernot LMC (2000) A driving simulator study ofthe effects of MDMA (Ecstasy) on driving performance and traffic safety.Proceedings of the International Council on Alcohol Drugs and TrafficSafety (ICADTS), Stockhom Sweden, May 2000

  • De Wit H, Enggasser JL, Richards JB (2002) Acute administration of d-amphetamine decreases impulsivity in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology 27(5):813–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drummer OH, Gerostamoulos J, Batziris H, Chu M, Caplehorn J, Robertson MD, Swann P (2003a) The involvement of drugs in drivers of motor vehicles killed in Australian road traffic crashes. Accid Anal Prev 943:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Drummer OH, Gerostamoulos J, Batziris H, Chu M, Caplehorn JRM, Robertson MD, Swann P (2003b). The incidence of drugs in drivers killed in Australian road traffic crashes. Forensic Sci Int 134:154–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterbrook JA (1959) The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organisation of behaviour. Psychol Rev 66(3):183–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenden Jl, Ryan CN (1996) The pharmacology of impulsive behaviours in rats: the effects of drugs on response choice with varying delays of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 128:161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman RS, Meyer JS, Quenzer LF (1997) Principles of neuropsychopharmacology. Sinauer Associates, Incorporated. Sunderland,MA

  • Fleming K, Bigelow LB, Weinberger DR, Goldberg TE (1995) Neuropsychological effects of amphetamine may correlate with personality characteristics. Psychopharmacol Bull 31(2):357–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday R, Naylor H, Brandeis D, Callaway E, Yano L, Herzig K (1994) The effect of d-amphetamine, clonidine, and yohimbine on human information processing. Psychophysiology 31:331–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst PM (1962) The effects of d-amphetamine on risk taking. Psychopharmacologia 3:283–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst PM, Weidner MF, Radlow R (1967) The effects of amphetamines upon judgement and decisions. Psychopharmacologia 1(5):397–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupietz SS, Bartlik B, Angrist B, Winsberg BG (1985) Psychostimulant plasma concentration and learning performance. J Clin Psychopharmacol 5(5):293–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan BK (1996) Methamphetamine and driving impairment. J Forensic Sci 41(3):457–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan BK, Fligner CL et al (1998) Cause and manner of death in fatalities involving methamphetamine. J Forensic Sci 43(1):28–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills KC, Spruill SE, Kanne RW, Parkman KM, Zhang Y (2001) The influence of stimulants, sedatives, and fatigue on tunnel vision: risk factors for driving and piloting. Hum Factors 43(2):310–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeller MR, Kraemer T (2002) Drugs of abuse monitoring in blood for control of driving under the influence of drugs. Ther Drug Monit 24:210–221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe RG (1998) Improved confidence intervals for the difference between binomial proportions based on paired data. Stat Med 17:2635–2650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wachtel SR, de Wit H (1999) Subjective and behavioural effects of repeated d-amphetamine in humans. Behav Pharmacol 10:271–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward AS, Kelly TH, Foltin RW, Fischman MW (1997) Effects of d-amphetamine on task performance and social behaviour of humans in a residential laboratory. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 5(2):130–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams GV, Goldman-Rakic PS (1995) Modulation of memory fields by dopamine D1 receptors in prefrontal cortex. Nature 376:549–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zametkin A, Rapoport J (1987) Neurobiology of attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity: where have we come in 50 years? J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 26:676–686

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Vic Roads, Melbourne, Australia, provided funding for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Stough.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silber, B.Y., Papafotiou, K., Croft, R.J. et al. The effects of dexamphetamine on simulated driving performance. Psychopharmacology 179, 536–543 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-004-2061-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-004-2061-x

Keywords

Navigation