References
Ahmed SH, Koob GF (1998) Transition from moderate to excessive drug intake: change in hedonic set point. Science 282:298–300
Barrett JE (1987) Nonpharmacological factors determining the behavioral effects of drugs. In: Meltzer HY (ed) Psychopharmacology: the third generation of progress. Raven Press, New York, pp 1493–1501
Bickel WK, Madden GJ, Petry NM (1998) The price of change: the behavioral economics of drug dependence. Behav Ther 29:545–565
Higgins ST (1996) Some potential contributions of reinforcement and consumer demand theory to reducing cocaine abuse. Addict Behav 21:803–816
Higgins ST, Badger GJ, Budney AJ (2000) Initial abstinence and success in achieving longer term cocaine abstinence. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 8:377–386
Higgins ST, Heil SH, Plebani Lussier J (2003) Clinical implications of reinforcement as a determinant of substance use disorders. Ann Rev Psychol (in press)
Katz JL, Higgins ST (2003) The ‘reinstatement’ model of craving and relapse to drug use. Psychopharmacology (in press)
Kenford SL, Fiore MC, Jorenby DE, Smith SS, Wetter D, Baker TB (1994) Predicting smoking cessation. Who will quit with and without the nicotine patch. JAMA 271:589–594
Panlilio LV, Katz JL, Pickens RW, Schindler CW (2003) Variability of drug self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology 167:9–19
Robinson TE, Becker JB (1986) Enduring changes in brain and behavior produced by chronic amphetamine administration: a review and evaluation of animal models of amphetamine psychosis. Brain Res Rev 11:157–198
Spealman RD, Kelleher RT (1979) Behavioral effects of self-administered cocaine: responding maintained alternately by cocaine and electric shock in squirrel monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 210:206–214
Zernig G, Wakonigg G, Madlung E, Haring C, SariaA (2003) Do vertical shifts in dose-response rate-relationships in operant conditioning procedures indicate “sensitization” to “drug wanting”? Psychopharmacology (present issue)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This reply refers to the letter http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-003-1601-0.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Katz, J.L., Higgins, S.T. What is represented by vertical shifts in self-administration dose–response curves?. Psychopharmacology 171, 360–361 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-003-1605-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-003-1605-9