Skip to main content
Log in

Ethical issues in the use of animals in biomedical and psychopharmocological research

  • Review
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

The ethical debate concerning the use of animals in biomedical and pharmacological research continues to be replete with misunderstandings about whether animals have moral standing.

Objectives

This article briefly reviews the central ethical positions and their relationship to the basic parameters of research regulation from an international perspective. The issues associated with the validation of animal models will then be discussed. Finally, suggestions for empirical ethics research will be presented.

Methods

Recent literature reviews were accessed and analyzed.

Results

This review summarizes the pertinent ethical and research literature.

Conclusions

In summary, regardless of the ethical perspective one favors, there is strong agreement that animals matter morally and that at a minimum their welfare must be considered. This position is reflected in the structure of national regulatory schemes that emphasize the three Rs (replacement, reduction, refinement). Researchers should more actively participate in the discussion by becoming more knowledgeable about the details of the ethical issues. Research with animal models has been problematic in that it has often focused on attempting to produce global models of psychiatric disorders, which suffer from inherent validity problems. Researchers must also become more sophisticated about issues of model validation and the nature of the animals they use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babkin BP (1938) Experimental neuroses in animals and their treatment with bromides. Edinb Med J 45:605–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp T (1997) Opposing views on animal experimentation: do animals have rights? Ethics Behav 7:113–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody B (1998) The ethics of biomedical research: an international perspective. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen C (1986) The case for the use of animals in biomedical research. N Engl J Med 315:865–70

    Google Scholar 

  • De Grazia D (1991) The moral status of animals and their use in research: a philosophical review. Kennedy Inst Ethics J1:48–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Epling W (1989) Rats. Behav Anal 12:251–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey R (2002) Ethics, animals, and scientific inquiry. In: Gluck JP, DiPasquale T, Orlans FB (eds) Applied ethics in animal research: philosophy, regulation, and laboratory applications. Purdue, West Lafayette, pp 13–24

  • Geyer MA, Markou A (1995) Animal models of psychiatric disorders. In Bloom FE, Kupfer DJ (eds) Psychopharmacology: the fourth generation of progress. Raven, New York, pp 787–798

  • Gluck JP (1997) Learning to see the animals again. In: Lafollette H (ed) Ethics in practice. Blackwell, London, pp 160–167

  • Gluck JP, DiPasquale T (2002) Introduction and overview. In: Gluck JP DiPasquale T, Orlans FB (eds) Applied ethics in animal research: philosophy, regulation, and laboratory applications. Purdue, West Lafayette, pp 1–11

  • Gluck JP, Kubacki SR (1991) Animals in biomedical research: the undermining effect of the rhetoric of the besieged. Ethics Behav 1:157–173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman S, Check E (2002) Animal experiments: the great primate debate. Nature 417:684–687

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin D (1981) The question of animal awareness. Rockefeller University, New York

  • Griffin D (1984) Animal thinking. Harvard University, Cambridge

  • Griffin D (1992) Animal minds. University of Chicago, Chicago

  • Harlow HF, Harlow MK, Suomi SJ (1971) From thought to therapy: lessons from a primate laboratory. Am Sci 59:538–549

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser M (2000) Wild minds. Henry Holt, New York

  • Kilts CD (2001) The changing roles and targets for animal models of schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 50:845-855

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masserman JH (1946) Principles of dynamic psychiatry. Saunders, Philadelphia

  • McClearn G (1979) Genetics and alcholism simulacra. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 3:255–258

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Midgeley M (1984) Animals and why they matter. University of Georgia Press, Athens

  • Morrison A (2001) A scientist's perspective on the ethics of using animals in behavioral research. In: Carroll M, Overmier JB (2001) Animal research and human health. American Psychological Association, Washington D.C.

  • Morrison A (2002) Developing an ethical view on the use of animals in biomedical research. Physiologist 45:135–144

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orlans FB (2002) Ethical themes of the national regulations governing animal experiments: an international perspective. In: Gluck JP, DiPasquale T, Orlans FB (eds) Applied ethics in animal research: philosophy, regulation, and laboratory applications. Purdue University, West Lafayette

  • Overall KL (1994) Use of clomipramine to treat ritualistic motor behavior in dogs. J Am Vet Assoc 205:1733–1741

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Regan T (1983) The case for animal rights. University of California, Berkeley

  • Roberts LW, Warner T, Brody J (2000) Perspectives of schizophrenia patients and psychiatrists regarding ethically important aspects of research participation. Am J Psychiatry 157:67–74

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rollin B (1989) The unheeded cry: animal consciousness, animal pain and science. Oxford University, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell W, Burch R (1959) The principles of humane experimental technique. Methuen, London

  • Sapontzis S (1987) Morals, reasons and animals. Temple University, Philadelphia

  • Shenger-Krestovnikova NR (1921) Contributions to the question of differentiation of visual stimuli and the limits of differentiation by the visual analyzer of the dog. Bull Lesgaft Inst Petrograd 3:1–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer P (1975) Animal liberation: a new ethics for the treatment of animals. New York Review, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer P (1990) Animal liberation: a new ethics for the treatment of animals, 2nd edn. New York Review, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Willner P (1995) Animal models of depression: validity and applications. In: Gessa G, Fratta W, Pani L, Serra G (eds) Depression and mania: from neurobiology to treatment. Raven, New York, pp 19–41

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John P. Gluck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gluck, J.P., Bell, J. Ethical issues in the use of animals in biomedical and psychopharmocological research. Psychopharmacology 171, 6–12 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-003-1478-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-003-1478-y

Keywords

Navigation