Abstract.
Rat or human neocortical synaptosomes were used to study the role of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels and the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger in 45Ca2+ influx into nerve terminals. K+ depolarization-induced 45Ca2+ influx through voltage-gated Ca2+ channels into rat or human synaptosomes was completely blocked by mibefradil 30 µM or Cd2+ 100 µM but was not affected by tetrodotoxin 1 µM. It was reduced by ω-agatoxin IVA 0.2 µM by 68% in synaptosomes of either species, whereas ω-conotoxin GVIA 0.1 µM and nifedipine 1 µM had no effect. Veratridine-induced 45Ca2+ entry into rat neocortical synaptosomes was completely blocked by mibefradil 30 µM, reduced by 80% by Cd2+ 100 µM, by 90% by tetrodotoxin 1 µM and by 53% by ω-agatoxin IVA 0.2 µM but not by ω-conotoxin GVIA 0.1 µM or nifedipine 1 µM. Na+/Ca2+ exchanger-mediated 45Ca2+ uptake into rat neocortical synaptosomes evoked by replacement of Na+ by choline+ in the incubation buffer was reduced by KB-R7943 (3–50 µM), an inhibitor of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, in a concentration-dependent manner (maximal inhibition by 46% at 50 µM; IC23%=7.1 µM). Mibefradil also inhibited the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger-mediated Ca2+ uptake, although at 3.7 times lower potency (IC23%=26 µM). It is concluded that in rat and human neocortical nerve terminals Ca2+ entry is mediated under physiological conditions by P/Q-type, but not by N- or L-type Ca2+ channels or the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger. If the cytosolic Na+ concentration is increased, Ca2+ is also taken up via the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger. In addition to the ability of mibefradil to block all voltage-operated Ca2+ channels, this drug is a low potency inhibitor of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Electronic Publication
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fink, K., Meder, W.P., Clusmann, H. et al. Ca2+ entry via P/Q-type Ca2+ channels and the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger in rat and human neocortical synaptosomes. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 366, 458–463 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-002-0629-8
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-002-0629-8