Abstract
Suppose \(\pi :W\rightarrow S\) is a smooth, surjective, proper morphism to a variety S contained as a Zariski open subset in a smooth, complex variety \({\bar{S}}\). The goal of this note is to consider the question of when \(\pi \) admits a regular, flat compactification. In other words, when does there exists a flat, proper morphism \({\bar{\pi }}:\overline{W}\rightarrow {\bar{S}}\) extending \(\pi \) with \(\overline{W}\) regular? One interesting recent example of this occurs in the preprint of Laza et al. (Acta Mathematica. arXiv:1602.05534, 2016) where \(\pi \) is a family of abelian fivefolds over a Zariski open subset S of \({\bar{S}}=\mathbb {P}^5\). In that paper, the authors construct \(\overline{W}\) using the theory of compactified Prym varieties and show that it is a holomorphic symplectic manifold (deformation equivalent to O’Grady’s 10-dimensional example). In this note I observe that non-vanishing of the local intersection cohomology of \(R^1\pi _*\mathbb {Q}\) in degree at least 2 provides an obstruction to finding a \({\bar{\pi }}\). Moreover, non-vanishing in degree 1 provides an obstruction to finding a \({\bar{\pi }}\) with irreducible fibers. Then I observe that, in some cases of interest, results of Brylinski (Astérisque 140–141:3–134, 251, 1986) Beilinson (Regulators 571:19–23, 2012) and Schnell (Math Ann 354(2):727–763, 2012) can be used to compute the intersection cohomology. I also give examples involving cubic fourfolds motivated by Laza et al. (Acta Mathematica. arXiv:1602.05534, 2016) and ask a question about palindromicity of hyperplane sections.
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
References
Beilinson, A.: A remark on primitive cycles and Fourier-Radon transform. In: Regulators, Contemp. Math., vol. 571, pp. 19–23. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence (2012)
Beĭlinson, A.A., Bernstein, J., Deligne, P.: Faisceaux pervers. Analysis and topology on singular spaces. I (Luminy, 1981), Astérisque, vol. 100, pp. 5–171. Soc. Math. France, Paris (1982)
Brosnan, P., Chow, T.Y.: Unit interval orders and the dot action on the cohomology of regular semisimple Hessenberg varieties (2015). arXiv:1511.00773
Brylinski, J.-L.: Transformations canoniques, dualité projective, théorie de Lefschetz, transformations de Fourier et sommes trigonométriques, Géométrie et analyse microlocales. Astérisque (140-141):3–134, 251 (1986)
Deligne, P.: Théorème de Lefschetz et critères de dégénérescence de suites spectrales. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 35, 259–278 (1968)
Dimca, A.: On the homology and cohomology of complete intersections with isolated singularities. Compos. Math. 58(3), 321–339 (1986)
Dolgachev, I.: Corrado Segre and nodal cubic threefolds (2015). arXiv:1501.06432
Hartshorne, R.: Algebraic geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, No. 52. Springer, New York (1977)
Hironaka, H.: Resolution of singularities of an algebraic variety over a field of characteristic zero. I, II. Ann. Math. (2) 79, 109–203 (1964)
Hironaka, H.: Resolution of singularities of an algebraic variety over a field of characteristic zero. I, II. Ann. Math. (2) 79, 205–326 (1964)
Kim, S.-O.: Noether–Lefschetz locus for surfaces. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 324(1), 369–384 (1991)
Laza, R., Saccà, G., Voisin, C.: A hyper-Kähler compactification of the Intermediate Jacobian fibration associated to a cubic fourfold. Acta Mathematica (2016). arXiv:1602.05534
Nagata, M.: Imbedding of an abstract variety in a complete variety. J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 2, 1–10 (1962)
Rapoport, M.: Complément à l’article de P. Deligne “La conjecture de Weil pour les surfaces \(K3\)”. Invent. Math. 15, 227–236 (1972)
Saito, M.: Modules de Hodge polarisables. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 24(6):849–995 (1989) (1988)
Schnell, C.: Residues and filtered D-modules. Math. Ann. 354(2), 727–763 (2012)
Voisin, C.: Hodge theory and complex algebraic geometry. II, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 77. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (English edition, Translated from the French by Leila Schneps) (2007)
Acknowledgements
This work was made possible by an NSF Focused Research Project on Hodge theory and moduli held in collaboration with M. Kerr, R. Laza, G. Pearlstein and C. Robles. In fact, the note itself began as an email to Laza. I thank the FRG members listed above as well as G. Saccà for encouragement and useful conversations. I also thank M. Nori for giving me a lot of help with Sect. 4, and B. Klingler for inviting me and Nori to Paris Diderot during the Summer 2016. I thank A. Otwinowska for comments pertaining to Conjecture 4.4, J. Achter for telling me about the tables in M. Rapoport’s paper [14], O. Martin for help with Lemma 4.7 along with several other suggestions (including, but not limited to, extensive typo correction) and N. Fakhruddin for advice, which turned out to be very helpful, on how to improve the exposition. Lastly I thank the referee for suggestions and typo corrections, but also for a small comment on the notions of “general” and “Hodge general” which helped me to reformulate the results in Sect. 4. (See Remark 4.2 and the proof of Corollary 4.3.) The interaction between palindromicity and intersection cohomology comes up in a similar way to the way it is used here in my joint paper [3] written with T. Chow. I thank Chow for many conversations about the notion of palindromicity.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brosnan, P. Perverse obstructions to flat regular compactifications. Math. Z. 290, 103–110 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00209-017-2010-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00209-017-2010-0