Abstract
Given \({\delta }>0\) we construct a group \(G\) and a group ring element \(S\in \mathbb Z[G]\) such that the spectral measure \(\mu \) of \(S\) fulfils \(\mu ((0,{\varepsilon })) > \frac{C}{|\log ({\varepsilon })|^{1+{\delta }}}\) for small \({\varepsilon }\). In particular the Novikov-Shubin invariant of any such \(S\) is \(0\). The constructed examples show that the best known upper bounds on \(\mu ((0,{\varepsilon }))\) are not far from being optimal.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We warn the reader that, because of a typo, the statement of [10, Proposition 6.1(b)] is false. The correct statement is with \(\limsup \) on the left-hand side, and “\(\leqslant \)” instead of “\(=\)”.
References
Austin, T.: Rational group ring elements with kernels having irrational dimension. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 107(6), 1424–1448 (2013)
Béguin, C., Valette, A., Zuk, A.: On the spectrum of a random walk on the discrete Heisenberg group and the norm of Harper’s operator. J. Geom. Phys. 21(4), 337–356 (1997)
Biggs, N.: Algebraic graph theory, 2nd edn. In: Cambridge Mathematical Library. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)
Campanino, M., Perez, J.F.: Singularity of the density of states for one-dimensional chains with random couplings. Comm. Math. Phys. 124(4), 543–552 (1989)
Clair, B.: Residual amenability and the approximation of \(L^2\)-invariants. Michigan Math. J. 46(2), 331–346 (1999)
Dicks, W., Schick, T.: The spectral measure of certain elements of the complex group ring of a wreath product. Geom. Dedicata 93, 121–137 (2002)
Dyson, F.J.: The dynamics of a disordered linear chain. Phys. Rev. 2(92), 1331–1338 (1953)
Eckmann, B.: Introduction to \(l_2\)-methods in topology: reduced \(l_2\)-homology, harmonic chains, \(l_2\)-Betti numbers. Israel J. Math. 117, 183–219 (2000) (Notes prepared by Guido Mislin)
Eggarter, T.P., Riedinger, R.: Singular behavior of tight-binding chains with off-diagonal disorder. Phys. Rev. B 18, 569–575 (1978)
Elek, G., Szabó, E.: Hyperlinearity, essentially free actions and \(L^2\)-invariants. The sofic property. Math. Ann. 332(2), 421–441 (2005)
Folland, G.B.: A course in abstract harmonic analysis. In: Studies in Advanced Mathematics. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1995)
Grabowski, Ł.: Irrational \(l^2\)-invariants arising from the lamplighter group (2010). Preprint, available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1009.0229
Grabowski, Ł.: On Turing dynamical systems and the Atiyah problem. Invent. Math. 198(1), 27–69 (2014)
Horn, R.A., Johnson, C.R.: Matrix analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990) (Corrected reprint of the 1985 original)
Lehner, F., Neuhauser, M., Woess, W.: On the spectrum of lamplighter groups and percolation clusters. Math. Ann. 342(1), 69–89 (2008)
Lehner, F., Wagner, S.: Free lamplighter groups and a question of Atiyah. Am. J. Math. 135(3), 835–849 (2013)
Li, H., Thom, A.: Entropy, determinants, and \(L^2\)-torsion. J. Am. Math. Soc. 27(1), 239–292 (2014)
Lott, J., Lück, W.: L 2-topological invariants of 3-manifolds. Invent. Mathematicae 120(1), 15–60 (1995)
Lovász, L.: Large networks and graph limits. In: American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, vol. 60. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2012)
Lück, W.: Approximating \(L^2\)-invariants by their finite-dimensional analogues. Geom. Funct. Anal. 4(4), 455–481 (1994)
Lück, W.: \(L^2\)-invariants: theory and applications to geometry and \(K\)-theory. In: Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics], vol. 44. Springer, Berlin (2002)
Lück, W.: Estimates for spectral density functions of matrices over C[Z\(\wedge \)d] (2013). Preprint, available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.8564
Martinelli, F., Micheli, L.: On the large-coupling-constant behavior of the Liapunov exponent in a binary alloy. J. Stat. Phys. 48(1–2), 1–18 (1987)
Pestov, V.G.: Hyperlinear and sofic groups: a brief guide. Bull. Symb. Logic 14(4), 449–480 (2008)
Pichot, M., Schick, T., Zuk, A.: Closed manifolds with transcendental L2-Betti numbers. ArXiv e-prints (2010)
Reed, M., Simon, B.: Methods of modern mathematical physics. I, Functional analysis, 2nd edn. Academic Press Inc. [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers], New York (1980)
Sauer, R.: Power series over the group ring of a free group and applications to Novikov-Shubin invariants. In: High-Dimensional Manifold Yopology, pp. 449–468. World Scientific Publishing, River Edge (2003)
Schick, T.: \(L^2\)-determinant class and approximation of \(L^2\)-Betti numbers. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 353(8), 3247–3265 (2001)
Thom, A.: Sofic groups and Diophantine approximation. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 61(8), 1155–1171 (2008)
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Holger Kammeyer, Thomas Schick and an anonymous referee for valuable comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by EPSRC grant EP/K012045/1.
Appendix: A counterexample to Conjecture 1 from mathematical physics
Appendix: A counterexample to Conjecture 1 from mathematical physics
In this appendix we present the following unpublished observation of the author and B. Virág: a counterexample to Conjecture 1 can be also deduced from the mathematical physics literature.
Let us specialize to the following situation. Let \(\mathbf Z\curvearrowright X\) be an essentially free action (i.e. free on a subset of full measure). Let \(t\in \mathbf Z\) be a fixed generator, let \(F:X \rightarrow \mathbb R\) be a bounded measurable function and let \(T\in {\Gamma }\ltimes L^\infty (X)\) be
For \(x\in X\) let \(T(x):l^2(\mathbb Z)\rightarrow l^2(\mathbb Z)\) be defined on the standard basis vectors as
Let us identify \(l^2(\mathbf Z)\) with \(l^2(\mathbb Z)\) in the natural way. As explained in Sect. 2, \(T\) is an operator on \(\int ^\oplus _X l^2(\mathbb Z) \, d\mu (x)\) which preserves the fibers \(l^2(\mathbb Z)\). A direct check shows that \(T\) decomposes as
Since \(\tau (T) = \int _X \langle T(x)\zeta _0,\zeta _0\rangle \), we have the following formula for the spectral measure of \(\mu _T\) of \(T\):
where \(D\subset \mathbb R\) is a measurable set and \(P(x,D)\) is the spectral projection of \(T(x)\) corresponding to the set \(D\) (see e.g. [13, Lemma 1.9]).
The measure \(D\mapsto \langle P(x,D)\zeta _0, \zeta _0\rangle \) on \(\mathbb R\) is called the rooted spectral measure of \(T(x)\). Equation (12) can be concisely summarized as follows. The family \(T(x)\), \(x\in X\), is a random operator, and the spectral measure of \(T\) is equal to the expected rooted spectral measure of \(T(x)\).
We specialize further as follows. Let \((S,\nu )\) be a compact abelian group with the normalized Haar measure, let \(A\) be its Pontryagin dual, and let \(X=\prod _\mathbb ZS\) together with the product measure. Consider the action \(\mathbf Z\curvearrowright X\) given by shifting the coordinates. Let \(f:S \rightarrow \mathbb R\) be a function in the image of the Pontryagin duality map \(\mathbb Q[A]\rightarrow L^\infty (S)\), and let \(F:X \rightarrow \mathbb R\) be defined as \(F((x_i)) := f(x_0)\).
For \(x=(x_i)\in X\) the formula (11) becomes
Such families of operators have been studied in mathematical physics at least since [7]. We provide a small dictionary. First, usually there would be no reference to a concrete measure space \(X\). The Eq. (13) would be written as
together with the assumption that the numbers \(W(k)\) are random, independent, and distributed according to some probability measure \({\varphi }\) on \(\mathbb R\). In the case of (13) the measure \({\varphi }\) is the push-forward of \(\nu \) through \(f\), i.e. \({\varphi }(D):=\nu (f^{-1}(D))\).
The operator \(H\) is the Hamiltonian associated to the one-dimensional disordered chain whose disorder is i.i.d., distributed according to the law \({\varphi }\). The spectral measure of the original \(T\in \mathbf Z\ltimes L^\infty (X)\) given by (10) is referred to as the expected spectral measure, or the expected density of states, in order to differentiate it from the rooted spectral measures of the operators \(T(x)\), \(x\in X\).
In his very impressive article, Dyson [7] considered a disorder distributed according to some specific measure \({\varphi }\). He showed that for that specific disorder the expected spectral measure \(\mu _H\) has the property
where \(\approx \) means that the ratio of both sides approaches a positive constant when \({\varepsilon }\rightarrow 0\). Since then, such behaviour is referred to as the Dyson’s singularity. It is the most eminent qualitative difference between the disordered chains and the situation without a disorder, i.e. when all \(W(k)\) are equal to \(1\).
We cannot use Dyson’s result to give a counterexample to Conjecture 1, because the measure \({\varphi }\) he considered is not supported in a bounded interval. Accordingly \({\varphi }\) is not a push-forward of \(\nu \) through \(F\in L^\infty (X)\) (since, by definition, such \(F\) must be bounded, and so the push-forward of any measure through \(F\) is supported in a bounded interval). In particular, the Hamiltonian considered by Dyson is not an element of the von Neumann algebra \(\mathbf Z\ltimes L^\infty (X)\).
However, Dyson’s singularity (15) has been conjectured to appear for arbitrary measures \({\varphi }\) which have a non-atomic part. So far, the exact form (15) has been confirmed only via heuristic arguments (e.g. [9]). However, the following has been rigorously established. Recall that \(G\in L^1(\mathbb R)\) is the density of a measure \({\varphi }\) if for every measurable \(D\subset \mathbb R\) we have \({\varphi }(D) = \int _D G(x) \,dx\).
Theorem 11
(Campanino and Perez [4]) Let \(W\) in (14) be distributed according to a measure \({\varphi }\) with a continuous density supported in an interval \((a, b)\), where \(b>a>0\). Then the expected spectral measure \(\mu _H\) of (14) has the property that
for some \(C>0\) and all sufficiently small \({\varepsilon }\).
As such, to provide a counterexample to Conjecture 1, it is enough to find a compact abelian group \((S,\nu )\) together with its Pontryagin dual \(A\) and \({\widehat{f}}\in \mathbb Q[A]\) such that the push-forward of \(\nu \) through \(f:S\rightarrow \mathbb R\) has a continuous density supported in some interval \((a, b)\), where \(b>a>0\). A simple exercise in the Fourier transform shows that we can take \(A=\mathbf Z^3\) and \({\widehat{f}} = s_1+s_1^{-1}+s_2+s_2^{-1}+s_3+s_3^{-1}+7\).
Together with Lemma 5 we obtain the following.
Corollary 12
Let \(T\in \mathbb Q[\mathbf Z^3\wr \mathbf Z]\) be given as
Then the spectral measure \(\mu _T\) of \(T\) has the property that
for some \(C>0\) and all sufficiently small \({\varepsilon }\).
Remarks 13
At least one other example of a group ring element with an interesting spectral measure can be exhibited using mathematical physics literature. Let \(a\) be the non-trivial element of \(\mathbf Z_2\) and let \(T\in \mathbb R[\mathbf Z_2\wr \mathbf Z]\) be given as \(T:= t+t^{-1} + {\beta }\cdot a \in \mathbb R[\mathbf Z_2\wr \mathbf Z]\), where \({\beta }\in \mathbb R\). Then [23] implies, repeating the discussion above, that when \({\beta }\) is large enough, the spectral measure of \(T\) has only singularly continuous part, i.e. it has no atoms and it is not possible to write it as \(f{\lambda }\), where \(f\) is a measurable function and \({\lambda }\) is the Lebesgue measure.
This is the only example of such behaviour known to the author. It has been conjectured that no singularly continuous part appears in the spectral measure of \(T\) when \(T\) is an element of the group ring of a torsion-free group ([29]). Unfortunately the mathematical physics literature does not seem to provide a counterexample to that conjecture.