Skip to main content
Log in

Interactions of sulfur oxidation repressor with its promoters involve different binding geometries

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The divergently transcribed sulfur oxidation (sox) operon of a sulfur chemolithotrophs, Pseudaminobacter salicylatoxidans KCT001, comprising sox TRS-VW-XYZABCD, is regulated by a repressor (SoxR). SoxR binds to two disparate operators, sv (present in between soxS and soxV) and wx (present in between soxW and soxX). Here we report details of the interaction between SoxR and these two operator regions of the sox operon, using methylation interference and hydroxyl radical footprinting. We propose that the sv operator is symmetric and compact, while the wx operator is asymmetric and extended. We report an interesting difference between the SoxR–sv interaction and the SoxR–wx interaction through a competition assay involving groove-specific ligands. SoxR binds in the major groove of the sv operator, but binds in the minor groove of the wx operator. The structural flexibility of the SoxR helps it to act differentially in its interactions with these two operators. Mutational analysis shows that SoxR uses different amino acid residues when binding to the sv operator versus the wx operator. Taken together, the results indicate that interaction between SoxR and the two operator sites involves different binding geometries. This makes SoxR the only known example of a ArsR-family protein that binds differentially to different operators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrade MA, Chacon P, Merelo JJ, Moram F (1993) Evaluation of secondary structures of proteins from U. V. circular dichroism using an unsupervised learning neural work. Protein Eng 6:383–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K (2002) Current protocol in molecular biology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagchi A, Roy D, Roy P (2005) Homology modeling of a transcriptional regulator SoxR of the lithotrophic sulfur oxidation (Sox) operon in α-Proteobacteria. J Biomol Str Dyn 22:571–578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bailly C, Payet D, Travers AA, Waring MJ (1996) PCR-based development of DNA substrates containing modified bases: an efficient system for investigating the role of the exocyclic groups in chemical and structural recognition by minor groove binding drugs and proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:13623–13628

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berg JM, Tymoczko JL, Stryer L (2002) Biochemistry, 5th edn. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York ISBN-10: 0-7167-3051-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Bewley CA, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM (1998) Minor groove-binding architectural proteins: structure, function, and DNA recognition. Annu Rev of Biophys Biomol Str 27:105–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock WO, Fernandez JM, Short JM (1987) XL1-Blue: a high efficiency plasmid transforming recA Escherichia coli strains with beta-galactosidase selection. Bio Tech 5:376–378

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Busenlehner LS, Pennella MA, Giedroc DP (2003) The SmtB/ArsR family of metalloregulatory transcriptional repressors: Structural insights into prokaryotic metal resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev 27:131–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deb C, Stackebrandt E, Padella S, Saha A, Roy P (2004) Phylogenetically diverse new sulfur chemolithotrophs of α-Proteobacteria isolated from Indian soils. Curr Microbiol 48:452–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fujii R, Kitaoka M, Hayashi K (2004) One-step random mutagenesis by error-prone rolling circle amplification. Nucleic Acids Res 32:e145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glasfeld A, Koehler AN, Schumacher MA, Brennan RG (1999) The role of lysine 55 in determining the specificity of the purine repressor for its operators through minor groove interactions. J Mol Biol 291(2):347–361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu EC, Sarangi F, Iorio C, Sidhu MS, Udem SA, Dillehay DL, Xu W, Rota PA, Bellini WJ, Richardson CD (1998) A single amino acid change in the hemagglutinin protein of measles virus determines its ability to bind CD46 and reveals another receptor on marmoset B cells. J Virol 72:2905–2916

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jain S, Kaushal D, Dasgupta SK, Tyagi AK (1997) Construction of shuttle vectors for genetic manipulation and molecular analysis of mycobacteria. Gene 190:37–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeeves M, Evans PD, Parslow RA, Jaseja M, Hyde EI (1999) Studies of the Escherichia coli Trp repressor binding to its five operators and to variant operator sequences. Eur J Biochem 265:919–928

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Zwieb C, Wu C, Adhya S (1989) Bending of DNA by gene-regulatory proteins construction and use of a DNA bending vector. Gene 85:15–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri C, Mandal S, Ghosh W, Dam B, Roy P (2006) A novel gene cluster soxSRT is essential for the chemolithotrophic oxidation of thiosulfate and tetrathionate by Pseudaminobacter salicylatoxidans KCT001. Curr Microbiol 54:267–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu D, Ishima R, Tong KI, Bagby S, Kokubo T, Muhandiram DR, Kay LE, Nakatani Y, Ikura M (1998) Solution structure of a TBP-TAF(II)230 complex: protein mimicry of the minor groove surface of the TATA box unwound by TBP. Cell 94(5):573–583

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lodish H, Berk A, Zipursky SL, Matsudaira P, Baltimore D, Darnell J (2000) Molecular cell biology, 4th edn. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York. ISBN 0-7167-3136-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandal S, Chatterjee S, Dam B, Roy P, Das Gupta SK (2007) The dimeric repressor SoxR binds cooperatively to the promoter(s) regulating expression of the sulfur oxidation (sox) operon of Pseudaminobacter salicylatoxidans KCT001. Microbiology 153:80–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyaya PN, Deb C, Lahiri C, Roy P (2000) A soxA gene, encoding a diheme cytochrome c, and a sox locus, essential for sulfur oxidation in a new sulfur lithotrophic bacterium. J Bacteriol 182:4278–4287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pabo C, Sauer R (1984) Protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem 53:293–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Privalov PL, Dragan AI, Crane-Robinson C, Breslauer KJ, Remeta DP, Minetti CASA (2007) What drives proteins into the major or minor grooves of DNA? J Mol Biol 365:1–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning, A laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer RT (1995) Minor groove DNA-recognition by alpha-helices. Nat Struct Biol 2:7–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider TD (2001) Strong minor groove base conservation in sequence logos implies DNA distortion or base flipping during replication and transcription initiation. Nucleic Acids Res 29:4881–4891

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Travers AA (1995) Reading the minor groove. Nat Struct Biol 2:615–618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tullius TD, Dombroski BA (1986) Hydroxyl radical “footprinting”: high-resolution information about DNA-protein contacts and application to lambda repressor and Cro protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:5469–5473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyke MW, Hertzberg RP, Dervan PB (1982) Map of distamycin, netropsin, and actinomycin binding sites on heterogeneous DNA: DNA cleavage-inhibition patterns with methidiumpropyl-EDTA.Fe(II). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:5470–5474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Magnuson RD (2005) Percolation of the phd repressor-operator interface. J Bacteriol 187:1901–1912

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

S.M. is grateful to C.S.I.R. for his research fellowships. We thank David Degen of Waksman Institute, Rutgers University for scientific discussion, and his help to proofread the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sukhendu Mandal.

Additional information

Communicated by Theo Hansen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mandal, S., Das Gupta, S.K. Interactions of sulfur oxidation repressor with its promoters involve different binding geometries. Arch Microbiol 194, 737–747 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-012-0808-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-012-0808-z

Keywords

Navigation