Abstract
The divergently transcribed sulfur oxidation (sox) operon of a sulfur chemolithotrophs, Pseudaminobacter salicylatoxidans KCT001, comprising sox TRS-VW-XYZABCD, is regulated by a repressor (SoxR). SoxR binds to two disparate operators, sv (present in between soxS and soxV) and wx (present in between soxW and soxX). Here we report details of the interaction between SoxR and these two operator regions of the sox operon, using methylation interference and hydroxyl radical footprinting. We propose that the sv operator is symmetric and compact, while the wx operator is asymmetric and extended. We report an interesting difference between the SoxR–sv interaction and the SoxR–wx interaction through a competition assay involving groove-specific ligands. SoxR binds in the major groove of the sv operator, but binds in the minor groove of the wx operator. The structural flexibility of the SoxR helps it to act differentially in its interactions with these two operators. Mutational analysis shows that SoxR uses different amino acid residues when binding to the sv operator versus the wx operator. Taken together, the results indicate that interaction between SoxR and the two operator sites involves different binding geometries. This makes SoxR the only known example of a ArsR-family protein that binds differentially to different operators.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrade MA, Chacon P, Merelo JJ, Moram F (1993) Evaluation of secondary structures of proteins from U. V. circular dichroism using an unsupervised learning neural work. Protein Eng 6:383–390
Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K (2002) Current protocol in molecular biology. Wiley, New York
Bagchi A, Roy D, Roy P (2005) Homology modeling of a transcriptional regulator SoxR of the lithotrophic sulfur oxidation (Sox) operon in α-Proteobacteria. J Biomol Str Dyn 22:571–578
Bailly C, Payet D, Travers AA, Waring MJ (1996) PCR-based development of DNA substrates containing modified bases: an efficient system for investigating the role of the exocyclic groups in chemical and structural recognition by minor groove binding drugs and proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:13623–13628
Berg JM, Tymoczko JL, Stryer L (2002) Biochemistry, 5th edn. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York ISBN-10: 0-7167-3051-0
Bewley CA, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM (1998) Minor groove-binding architectural proteins: structure, function, and DNA recognition. Annu Rev of Biophys Biomol Str 27:105–131
Bullock WO, Fernandez JM, Short JM (1987) XL1-Blue: a high efficiency plasmid transforming recA Escherichia coli strains with beta-galactosidase selection. Bio Tech 5:376–378
Busenlehner LS, Pennella MA, Giedroc DP (2003) The SmtB/ArsR family of metalloregulatory transcriptional repressors: Structural insights into prokaryotic metal resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev 27:131–143
Deb C, Stackebrandt E, Padella S, Saha A, Roy P (2004) Phylogenetically diverse new sulfur chemolithotrophs of α-Proteobacteria isolated from Indian soils. Curr Microbiol 48:452–458
Fujii R, Kitaoka M, Hayashi K (2004) One-step random mutagenesis by error-prone rolling circle amplification. Nucleic Acids Res 32:e145
Glasfeld A, Koehler AN, Schumacher MA, Brennan RG (1999) The role of lysine 55 in determining the specificity of the purine repressor for its operators through minor groove interactions. J Mol Biol 291(2):347–361
Hsu EC, Sarangi F, Iorio C, Sidhu MS, Udem SA, Dillehay DL, Xu W, Rota PA, Bellini WJ, Richardson CD (1998) A single amino acid change in the hemagglutinin protein of measles virus determines its ability to bind CD46 and reveals another receptor on marmoset B cells. J Virol 72:2905–2916
Jain S, Kaushal D, Dasgupta SK, Tyagi AK (1997) Construction of shuttle vectors for genetic manipulation and molecular analysis of mycobacteria. Gene 190:37–44
Jeeves M, Evans PD, Parslow RA, Jaseja M, Hyde EI (1999) Studies of the Escherichia coli Trp repressor binding to its five operators and to variant operator sequences. Eur J Biochem 265:919–928
Kim J, Zwieb C, Wu C, Adhya S (1989) Bending of DNA by gene-regulatory proteins construction and use of a DNA bending vector. Gene 85:15–23
Lahiri C, Mandal S, Ghosh W, Dam B, Roy P (2006) A novel gene cluster soxSRT is essential for the chemolithotrophic oxidation of thiosulfate and tetrathionate by Pseudaminobacter salicylatoxidans KCT001. Curr Microbiol 54:267–273
Liu D, Ishima R, Tong KI, Bagby S, Kokubo T, Muhandiram DR, Kay LE, Nakatani Y, Ikura M (1998) Solution structure of a TBP-TAF(II)230 complex: protein mimicry of the minor groove surface of the TATA box unwound by TBP. Cell 94(5):573–583
Lodish H, Berk A, Zipursky SL, Matsudaira P, Baltimore D, Darnell J (2000) Molecular cell biology, 4th edn. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York. ISBN 0-7167-3136-3
Mandal S, Chatterjee S, Dam B, Roy P, Das Gupta SK (2007) The dimeric repressor SoxR binds cooperatively to the promoter(s) regulating expression of the sulfur oxidation (sox) operon of Pseudaminobacter salicylatoxidans KCT001. Microbiology 153:80–91
Mukhopadhyaya PN, Deb C, Lahiri C, Roy P (2000) A soxA gene, encoding a diheme cytochrome c, and a sox locus, essential for sulfur oxidation in a new sulfur lithotrophic bacterium. J Bacteriol 182:4278–4287
Pabo C, Sauer R (1984) Protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem 53:293–321
Privalov PL, Dragan AI, Crane-Robinson C, Breslauer KJ, Remeta DP, Minetti CASA (2007) What drives proteins into the major or minor grooves of DNA? J Mol Biol 365:1–9
Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning, A laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor
Sauer RT (1995) Minor groove DNA-recognition by alpha-helices. Nat Struct Biol 2:7–9
Schneider TD (2001) Strong minor groove base conservation in sequence logos implies DNA distortion or base flipping during replication and transcription initiation. Nucleic Acids Res 29:4881–4891
Travers AA (1995) Reading the minor groove. Nat Struct Biol 2:615–618
Tullius TD, Dombroski BA (1986) Hydroxyl radical “footprinting”: high-resolution information about DNA-protein contacts and application to lambda repressor and Cro protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:5469–5473
Van Dyke MW, Hertzberg RP, Dervan PB (1982) Map of distamycin, netropsin, and actinomycin binding sites on heterogeneous DNA: DNA cleavage-inhibition patterns with methidiumpropyl-EDTA.Fe(II). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:5470–5474
Zhao X, Magnuson RD (2005) Percolation of the phd repressor-operator interface. J Bacteriol 187:1901–1912
Acknowledgments
S.M. is grateful to C.S.I.R. for his research fellowships. We thank David Degen of Waksman Institute, Rutgers University for scientific discussion, and his help to proofread the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Theo Hansen.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mandal, S., Das Gupta, S.K. Interactions of sulfur oxidation repressor with its promoters involve different binding geometries. Arch Microbiol 194, 737–747 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-012-0808-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-012-0808-z