Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal harmonic mitigation strategy based on multiobjective whale optimization algorithm for asymmetrical half-cascaded multilevel inverter

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the most significant issues related to the innovational multilevel inverters is the creation of high-step staircase quasi-sinusoidal voltage even with low number of semiconductors. In this paper, an innovational asymmetrical half-cascaded multilevel inverter (AHCMLI) is essentially proposed to solve this problem. The half-cascaded part of AHCMLI has operated as zero-positive level creator, and then, H-bridge part renders the perfect staircase quasi-sinusoidal voltage. The values of DC power sources of proposed AHCMLI have been defined based on an ingenious mathematical formula. On the other hand, due to the presence of high-order harmonics in output voltage of AHCMLI, they must be optimally mitigated. In this regard, an effectual and optimal rectangular notch–selective harmonic elimination–pulse width modulation (RN-SHEPWM) based on propagation proportion is suggested to simultaneously mitigate the twenty-ninth, thirty-first and thirty-fifth harmonics. Due to the multiobjective nature of the understudy problem and its special importance, it has been formulated based on multiobjective whale optimization algorithm (MOWOA). Finally, both the simulation and experimental results have decisively validated the level creation capability of proposed AHCMLI as compared to other structures. The values of twenty-ninth, thirty-first and thirty-fifth harmonics have been, respectively, mitigated to 0.0002857, 0.0003402 and 0.00029 using optimal RN-SHEPWM based on MOWOA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amjad AM, Salam Z, Saif AMA (2015) Application of differential evolution for cascaded multilevel VSI with harmonics elimination PWM switching. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 64:447–456

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chavarria J, Biel D, Guinjoan F, Meza C, Negroni JJ (2013) Energy-balance control of PV cascaded multilevel grid-connected inverters under level-shifted and phase-shifted PWMs. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 60(1):98–111

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wiatr P, Kaźmierkowski MP (2016) Model predictive control of multilevel cascaded converter with boosting capability—a simulation study. Bull Pol Acad Tech 64(3):581–590

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nabae A, Takahashi I, Agaki H (1981) A new neutral-point-clamped PWM inverter. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 17:518–523

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang L, Zhang D, Wang Y, Wu B, Athab HS (2016) Power and voltage balance control of a novel three-phase solid-state transformer using multilevel cascaded H-bridge inverters for microgrid applications. IEEE Trans Power Electron 31(4):3289–3301

    Google Scholar 

  6. Falehi AD, Rafiee M (2019) Design and analysis of novel optimal harmonic elimination strategy based on MOPSO to obliterate low-order harmonics of odd-nary cascaded transformers-based multilevel inverter. Math Methods Appl Sci 42(2):505–524

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Franquelo LG, Rodriguez J, Leon JI, Kouro S, Portillo R, Prats MAM (2017) The age of multi-level converters arrives. Bull Pol Acad Tech 65(5):567–578

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rodriguez J, Franquelo LG, Kouro S (2009) Multi-level converters: an enabling technology for high-power applications. IEEE Proc 97:1786–1817

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bose BK (2009) Power electronics and motor drives recent progress and perspective. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 56:558–581

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee SS (2018) Single-stage switched-capacitor module (S3CM) topology for cascaded multilevel inverter. IEEE Trans Power Electron 33(10):8204–8207

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen W, Duan Y, Guo L, Xuan Y, Yang X (2016) Modeling and prediction of radiated emission from solar cell in a photovoltaic generation system. IEEE J Photovolt 6(2):540–545

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mondal G, Gopakumar K, Tekwani PN, Levi E (2007) A reduced switch-count five-level inverter with common-mode voltage elimination for an open-end winding induction motor drive. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 54(4):2344–2351

    Google Scholar 

  13. Babaei E (2010) Optimal topologies for cascaded sub-multilevel converters. J Power Electron 10(3):251–261

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chiasson JN (2004) A unified approach to solving the harmonic elimination equations in multilevel converters. IEEE Trans Power Electron 19(2):478–490

    Google Scholar 

  15. Falehi AD, Rafiee M (2018) Optimal control of novel fuel cell-based DVR using ANFISC-MOSSA to increase FRT capability of DFIG-wind turbine. Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3312-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pandian S (2018) Power quality improvement using thermo-electric transducer powered multilevel inverter. Int J Pure Appl Math 119(16):4241–4249

    Google Scholar 

  17. Franquelo LG, Rodriguez J, Leon JI, Kouro S, Portillo R, Prats MAM (2008) The age of multi-level converters arrives. IEEE Ind Electron Mag 2:28–39

    Google Scholar 

  18. Falehi AD, Rafiee M (2017) Enhancement of DFIG-wind turbine’s LVRT capability using novel DVR based odd-nary cascaded asymmetric multi-level inverter. Eng Sci Technol Int J 20:805–824

    Google Scholar 

  19. Falehi AD, Rafiee M (2018) Maximum efficiency of wind energy using novel Dynamic Voltage Restorer for DFIG based Wind Turbine. Energy Rep 4:308–322

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liu M, Hong F, Wang C (2013) A novel flying-capacitor dual buck three-level inverter. In: IEEE applied power electronics conference and exposition, pp 502–506

  21. Yongdong L, Jianye R, Yue G (2010) Novel diode clamped five-level inverter topology with the inner loop DC-bus clamped. Trans China Electrotech Soc 25:100–106

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sadigh AK, Hosseini SH, Sabahi M, Gharehpetian GB (2010) Double flying capacitor multi-cell converter based on modified phase shifted pulse width modulation. IEEE Trans Power Electron 25:1517–1526

    Google Scholar 

  23. Banaei MR, Salary E (2011) Verification of new family for cascade multi-level inverters with reduction of components. J Electr Eng Technol 6:245–254

    Google Scholar 

  24. Babaei E, Hosseini SH, Gharehpetian GB, TarafdarHaque M, Sabahi M (2007) Reduction of dc voltage sources and switches in asymmetrical multi-level converters using a novel topology. Electr Power Syst Res 77:1073–1085

    Google Scholar 

  25. Banaei MR, Salary E (2011) Analysis of a generalized symmetrical multi-level inverter. J Circuit Syst Comput 20:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  26. Babaei E, Kangarlu MF, Sabahi M, Pahlavani MRA (2013) Cascaded multi-level inverter using sub-multi-level cells. Electr Power Syst Res 96:101–110

    Google Scholar 

  27. Banaei MR, Salary E (2011) New multi-level inverter with reduction of switches and gate driver. Energy Convers Manag 52:1129–1136

    Google Scholar 

  28. Holmes DG, Lipo TA (2003) Pulse width modulation for power converters: principles and practice. IEEE Press, Piscataway, pp 95–153

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kouro S, Rebolledo J, Rodriguez J (2007) Reduced switching-frequency-modulation algorithm f or high-power multi-level inverters. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 54:2894–2901

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ray RN, Chatterjee D, Goswami SK (2008) Harmonics elimination in a multi-level inverter using the particle swarm optimization technique. IET Power Electron 2:646–652

    Google Scholar 

  31. Taleb R, Derrouazin A (2014) USAMI control with a higher order harmonics elimination strategy based on the resultant theory. In: International conference on technologies and materials for renewable energy, environment and sustainability, pp 1045–1055

  32. Zhong D, Tolbert LM, Chiasson JN, Ozpineci B (2008) Reduced switching frequency active harmonic elimination for multi-level converters. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 55:1761–1770

    Google Scholar 

  33. Enjeti PN, Ziogas PD, Lindsay JF (1990) Programmed PWM techniques to eliminate harmonics: a critical evaluation. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 26:302–316

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang J, Du P, Niu T, Yang W (2017) A novel hybrid system based on a new proposed algorithm—multi-objective whale optimization algorithm for wind speed forecasting. Appl Energy 208:344–360

    Google Scholar 

  35. Babaei E, Kangarlu MF, Sabahi M (2014) Extended multi-level converters: an attempt to reduce the number of independent DC voltage sources in cascaded multi-level converters. IET Power Electron 7:157–166

    Google Scholar 

  36. Babaei E, Alilu S, Laali S (2014) A new general topology for cascaded multi-level inverters with reduced number of components based on developed H-bridge. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 61:3932–3939

    Google Scholar 

  37. Banaei MR, Oskuee JMR, Khounjahan H (2014) Reconfiguration of semi-cascaded multi-level inverter to improve systems performance parameters. IET Power Electron 7:1106–1112

    Google Scholar 

  38. Amjad AM, Salam Z (2014) A review of soft computing methods for harmonics elimination PWM for inverters in renewable energy conversion systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 33:141–153

    Google Scholar 

  39. Konstantinou GS, Dahidah MSA, Agelidis VG (2012) Solution trajectories for selective harmonic elimination pulse-width modulation for seven-level waveforms: analysis and implementation. IET Power Electron 5:22–30

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mafarja MM, Mirjalili S (2017) Hybrid whale optimization algorithm with simulated annealing for feature selection. Neurocomputing 260:302–312

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ling Y, Zhou Y, Luo Q (2017) Lévy flight trajectory-based whale optimization algorithm for global optimization. IEEE Access 5:6168–6186

    Google Scholar 

  42. Abdel-Basset M, El-Shahat D, El-Henawy I, Sangaiah AK, Ahmed SH (2018) A novel whale optimization algorithm for cryptanalysis in Merkle–Hellman cryptosystem. Mob Netw Appl 5:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  43. Falehi AD (2020) An innovative optimal RPO-FOSMC based on multi-objective grasshopper optimization algorithm for DFIG-based wind turbine to augment MPPT and FRT capabilities. Chaos Solitons Fractals 130:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109407

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Falehi AD (2018) MOWOA based design of FOPID–SSSC for load frequency control of interconnected multi-area power systems. Smart Struct Syst 22(1):81–94

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a dedicated grant from Islamic Azad University, Shadegan Branch, Iran: the grant entitled: “proposing new asymmetric multilevel inverter to reduce the number of semiconductor devices and increase the number of quasi-sinusoidal voltage levels.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Darvish Falehi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Darvish Falehi, A. Optimal harmonic mitigation strategy based on multiobjective whale optimization algorithm for asymmetrical half-cascaded multilevel inverter. Electr Eng 102, 1639–1650 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-020-00983-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-020-00983-y

Keywords

Navigation