Skip to main content
Log in

Calculation of reactive power service charges under competition of electric power industries

  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a reasonable methodology for computing the service charges for reactive power support and control in an open-access environment. The proposed method consists of two parts: one is to recover the capital costs of installed reactive power facilities, and the other is to recover the operational costs involved in reactive power production. The capital costs are divided into used and unused components, based on capacity usage, and are then recovered by a reactive-power tracing algorithm and a postage stamp rule, respectively. The operational costs are computed using spot prices with an optimal power flow program. Sample studies verify that the proposed method exhibits good results in practice compared with the real-time pricing method only. Moreover, the trend of reactive power charges with capacity variations of capacitor banks would help to determine the size of capacitor banks at the planning stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Cp i (Pg i ):

(Pg i )cost of the generator at bus i to produce Pg i

G :

set of all generator buses

Pg i ,Qg i :

,Qg i active and reactive power generation at bus i

N :

set of all buses

λp i , λg i :

, λg i Lagrange multipliers for active and reactive power flow equation at bus i

Pd i , Qd i :

, Qd i active and reactive power demands at bus i

V i , δ i :

, δ i bus voltage magnitude and angle at bus i

Y ij :

an element of bus admittance matrix of the transmission network

θ ij :

phase angle of Y ij

μp i,min , μp i,max :

, μp i,maxLagrange multipliers for minimum and maximum active power generation limit at bus i

μp i,min, μp i,max :

, μp i,maxLagrange multipliers for minimum and maximum reactive power generation limit at bus i

ν i ,min ν i, max :

,min ν i, maxLagrange multipliers for minimum and maximum voltage limit at bus i

η ij :

Lagrange multiplier for power flow limit from bus i to bus j

Cq used, i , Cq un-used, i :

, Cq un-used, i used and unused components for capital cost of reactive power facility i

Qg capac, i :

capacity of reactive power generation at bus i

αq i :

postage stamp reactive power charge at bus i

βq i :

locational reactive power charge at bus i

K ji :

contribution of reactive power demand i to generation j

Δ i :

set of buses supplied directly from bus i

Q ij :

reactive power flow on line ij

Q i , Qd i :

, Qd i bus reactive power and reactive power demand at bus i

References

  1. Kirby B, Hirst E (1996) Ancillary service costs for 12 U.S. electric utilities. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report, ORNL/CON-427

  2. Gil JB, San Roman TG, Alba Rios JJ, Martin PS (2000) Reactive power pricing: a conceptual framework for remuneration and charging procedures. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15:483–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmed S, Strbac G (2000) A method for simulation and analysis of reactive power market. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15:1047–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. El-keib AA, Ma X (1997) Calculating short-run marginal costs of active and reactive power production. IEEE Trans Power Syst 12:559–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Weber JD, Overbye TJ, Saur PW, DeMarco CL (1998) A simulated based approach to pricing reactive power. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol 3. IEEE Computer Society Press, pp 96–103

  6. Bompard E, Carpaneto E, Chicco G, Napoli R, Gross G (2000) Reactive load modeling impacts on nodal prices in pool model electricity markets. IEEE Power Eng Soc Summer Meet 4:2150–2155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Choi JY, Rim S, Park J (1998) Optimal real time pricing of real and reactive powers. IEEE Trans Power Syst 13:1226–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dandachi NH, Rawlins MJ, Alsac O, Prais M, Scott B (1996) OPF for reactive pricing studies on the NGC system. IEEE Trans Power Syst 11:226–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baughman ML, Siddiqi SN (1991) real time pricing of reactive power: theory and case study results. IEEE Trans Power Syst 6:23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hao S, Papalexopoulos A (1997) Reactive power pricing and management. IEEE Trans Power Syst 12:95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chattopadhyay D, Bhattacharya K, Parikh J (1995) Optimal reactive power planning and its spot pricing: an integrated approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 10:2014–2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Momoh JA, Zhu J (1999) Multiple indices for optimal reactive power pricing and control. Int J Decision Support Syst 24:223–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ro K, Park S (2001) A method to calculate charge for reactive power service under competition of electric power utilities. KIEE Int Trans Power Eng 11A:39–44

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lamont JW, Fu J (1999) Cost analysis of reactive power support. IEEE Trans Power Syst 14:890–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kirschen D, Allen R, Strbac G (1997) Contributions of individual generators to loads and flows. IEEE Trans Power Syst 12:52–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bialek J (1996) Tracing the flow of electricity. IEE Proc Generat Transm Distrib 143:313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bialek J (1997) Topological generation and load distribution factors for supplement charge allocation in transmission open access. IEEE Trans Power Syst 12:1185–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu FF, Ni Y, Wei P (2000) Power transfer allocation for open access using graph theory- fundamentals and applications in systems without loop flow. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15:923–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Dongguk University Research Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Ro.

Appendix: Reactive-power tracing algorithm

Appendix: Reactive-power tracing algorithm

The electricity tracing method presented in [16] can be applied to reactive power tracing. Reactive-power tracing starts from power flow solutions. Since the method assumes lossless lines, it requires additional fictitious line nodes. Then the balance equation of reactive power outflows at bus i can be expressed as

$$Q_i = \sum\limits_{j \in \Delta _i } {\left| {Q_{ij} } \right| + Qd_i } = \sum\limits_{j \in \Delta _i } {{{\left| {Q_{ij} } \right|} \over {Q_j }}Q_j + Qd_i } $$
(10)

Equation (10) can be rewritten in matrix form as follows

$$ Q_i - \sum\limits_{j \in \Delta _i } {{{\left| {Q_{ij} } \right|} \over {Q_j }}Q_j } = Qd_i \;{\rm or}\;A_d Q = Qd $$
(11)

where an ij element of the matrix is represented as 1 for i=j, or

$$ - {{\left| {Q_{ji} } \right|} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left| {Q_{ji} } \right|} {Q_j }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {Q_j }}\;{\rm for}\;j \in \Delta _i $$

On multiplying the both sides of (11) by A d −1, we get the following equation:

$$Q_i = \sum\limits_{k = 1}^n {\left[ {A_d ^{ - 1} } \right]_{ik} Qd_k } $$
(12)

Using the proportional sharing principle, the reactive power generation at a bus can be calculated as

$$Qg_i = {{Qg_i } \over {Q_i }}\sum\limits_{k = 1}^n {\left[ {A_d ^{ - 1} } \right]_{ik} Qd_k } = \sum\limits_{k = 1}^n {K_{ik} Qd_k } $$
(13)

Equation (13) shows the contribution of the kth reactive power demand to the ith generator and can be used to trace reactive power flows.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ro, K. Calculation of reactive power service charges under competition of electric power industries. Electr Eng 85, 169–175 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-003-0159-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-003-0159-5

Keywords

Navigation