Abstract
Motivated by the Covid-19 epidemic, we build a SIR model with private decisions on social distancing and population heterogeneity in terms of infection-induced fatality rates, and calibrate it to UK data to understand the quantitative importance of these assumptions. Compared to our model, the calibrated benchmark version with constant mean contact rate significantly over-predicts the mean contact rate, the death toll, herd immunity and prevalence peak. Instead, the calibrated counterfactual version with endogenous social distancing but no heterogeneity massively under-predicts these statistics. We use our calibrated model to understand how the impact of mitigating policies on the epidemic may depend on the responses these policies induce across the various population segments. We find that policies that shut down some of the essential sectors have a stronger impact on the death toll than on infections and herd immunity compared to policies that shut down non-essential sectors. Furthermore, there might not be an after-wave after policies that shut down some of the essential sectors are lifted. Restrictions on social distancing can generate welfare gains relative to the case of no intervention. Milder but longer restrictions on less essential activities might be better in terms of these welfare gains than stricter but shorter restrictions, whereas the opposite might be the case for restrictions on more essential activities. Finally, shutting down some of the more essential sectors might generate larger welfare gains than shutting down the less essential sectors.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Acemoglou, D., Chernozhukov, N., Werning, I., Winston, M.D.: A multi-risk SIR model with optimally targeted lockdown. CEMMAP Working Paper CWP14/20 (2020)
Alvarez, F., Argente, D., Lippi, F.: A simple planning problem for COVID-19 lockdown, testing and tracing. Am. Econ. Rev. Insights (2020)
Anderson, R.M., Anderson, B., May, R.M.: Infectious Diseases of Humans: Dynamics and Control. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1992)
Bodenstein, M., Corsetti, C., Guerrieri, L.: Social distancing and supply disruption in a pandemic. Mimeo (2020)
Eichenbaum, M., Rebelo, S., Trabandt, M.: The macroeconomics of epidemics. Mimeo (2020)
Farboodi, M., Jarosch, G., Shimer, R.: Internal and External Effects of Social Distancing in a Pandemic. Becker Friedman Institute, Working Paper No 2020-47 (2020)
Fenichel, E.P.: Economic considerations for social distancing and behavioral based policies during an epidemic. J. Health Econ. 32, 440–451 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.01.002
Galanis, S.: Social proximity as a tool to fight pandemics. Mimeo (2020)
Geoffard, P.-Y., Philipson, T.: Rational epidemics and their public control. Int. Econ. Rev. 37, 603–624 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2307/2527443
Glover, A., Heathcote, J., Krueger, D., Rios-Rull, J.V.: Health versus wealth: on the distributional effects of controlling a pandemic. Mimeo (2020)
Hall, R.E., Jones, C.I., Klenow, P.J.: Trading off consumption and COVID-19 deaths. Mimeo (2020)
Kaplan, G., Moll, B., Violante, G.: Pandemics according to HANK. Mimeo (2020)
Keppo, J., Kudlyak, M., Quercioli, E., Smith, L., Wilson, A.: The behavioral SIR model, with applications to the Swine Flu and COVID-19 pandemics. Mimeo (2020)
Kermack, W.O., McKendrick, A.G.: A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proc. R. Soc. A 115(772), 700–721 (1927). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1927.0118
Kniesner, T., Viscusi, K.: The Value of a Statistical Life. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013.138
Krueger, D., Uhlig, H., Xie, T.: Macroeconomic dynamics and reallocation in an epidemic. Mimeo (2020)
Kucharski, A.J., Russell, T.W., Diamond, C., Liu, Y., Edmunds, J., Funk, S., Eggo, R.M.: Early dynamics of transmission and control of COVID-19: a mathematical modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30144-4
Linton, N.M., Kobayashi, T., Yang, Y., Hayashi, K., Akhmetzhanov, A.R., Jung, S.-M., Yuan, B., Kinoshita, R., Nishiura, H.: Incubation period and other epidemiological characteristics of 2019 novel coronavirus infections with right truncation: a statistical analysis of publicly available case data. J. Clin. Med. (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020538
Lourenço, J., Paton, R., Ghafari, M., Kraemer, M., Thompson, C., Simmonds, P., Klenerman, P., Gupta, S.: Fundamental principles of epidemic spread highlight the immediate need for large-scale serological surveys to assess the stage of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. medRxiv (2020)
Maloney, W.F., Taskin, T.: Social distancing and economic activity during COVID-19: a global view. COVID Econ. 13, 157–177 (2020)
Reluga, T.C.: Game theory of social distancing in response to an epidemic. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6(5), e1000793 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000793
Rowthorn, R., Toxvaerd, F.: The optimal control of infectious diseases via prevention and treatment. Mimeo (2017)
Toxvaerd, F.: Rational disinhibition and externalities in prevention. Int. Econ. Rev. 60(4), 1737–1755 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12402
Toxvaerd, F.: Equilibrium Social Distancing. Cambridge-INET Working Paper Series No: 2020/08 (2020)
Wu, D., Wu, T., Liu, Q., Yang, Z.: The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak: what we know. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 94, 44–48 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.004
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Makris, M. Covid and social distancing with a heterogenous population. Econ Theory 77, 445–494 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-021-01377-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-021-01377-2