Skip to main content
Log in

Non-monotoniticies and the all-pay auction tie-breaking rule

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Economic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Discontinuous games, such as auctions, may require special tie-breaking rules to guarantee equilibrium existence. The best results available ensure equilibrium existence only in mixed strategy with endogenously defined tie-breaking rules and communication of private information. We show that an all-pay auction tie-breaking rule is sufficient for the existence of pure strategy equilibrium in a class of auctions. The rule is explicitly defined and does not require communication of private information. We also characterize when special tie-breaking rules are really needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Araujo, A., de Castro, L.: Pure strategy equilibria of single and double auctions with interdependent values. Gam Econ Behav (forthcoming) (2007)

  • Araujo, A., Moreira, H.: Adverse selection problems without the Spence-Mirrlees condition, working paper, IMPA (2000)

  • Araujo, A., Moreira, H.: Non-monotone insurance contracts and their empirical consequences, working paper, IMPA (2003)

  • Athey S., Levin J. (2001) Information and competition in U.S. Forest service timber auctions. J Polit Econ 109: 375–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Castro, L.: Affiliation, equilibrium existence and the revenue ranking of auctions, working paper 07-49 (25), Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, available at http://www.impa.br/~luciano/affiliation.pdf (2007)

  • de Frutos M.A., Pechlivanos L. (2006) Second-price common-value auctions under multidimensional uncertainty. Gam Econ Behav 55: 43–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta P., Maskin E. (2000) Efficient auctions. Q J Econ 115: 341–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewerhart C., Fieseler K. (2003) Procurement auctions and unit-price contracts. Rand J Econ 34: 569–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton R.L., McAfee R.P. (1999) Auctioning entry in tournaments. J Polit Econ 107: 573–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M.O., Simon L.K., Swinkels J.M., Zame W.R. (2002) Communication and equilibrium in discontinuous games of incomplete information. Econometrica 70: 1711–1741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M.O., Simon L.K., Swinkels J.M., Zame W.R. (2004) Corrigendum to communication and equilibrium in discontinuous games of incomplete information. Econometrica 72: 1927–1929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehiel P., Moldovanu B., Stacchetti E. (1996) How (not) to sell nuclear weapons. Amer Econ Rev 86: 814–829

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallenberg O. (2002) Foundations of Modern Probability, Springer Series in statistics. Heidelberg: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann E.L. (1959) Testing Statistical Hypotheses, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskin E., Riley J. (1984) Optimal auctions with risk averse buyers. Econometrica 52: 1473–1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskin E., Riley J. (2000) Equilibrium in sealed high bid auctions. Rev Econ Stud 67: 439–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens J.F., Zamir S. (1985) Formulation of Bayesian analysis for games with incomplete information. Int J Game Theory 14: 1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom P.R., Weber R.J. (1982) A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica 50: 1089–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro, P.: First-price auction symmetric equilibria with a general distribution, working paper EPGE n. 568 (2004)

  • Reny P., Zamir S. (2004) On the existence of pure strategy monotone equilibria in asymmetric first-price auctions. Econometrica 72: 1105–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon L.K., Zame W.R. (1990) Discontinuous games and endogenous sharing rules. Econometrica 58: 861–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. (1995) Digging for golden carrots: an analysis of research tournaments. Am Econ Rev 85: 872–890

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng C.Z. (2001) High bids and broke winners. J Econ Theory 100: 129–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciano I. de Castro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Araujo, A., de Castro, L.I. & Moreira, H. Non-monotoniticies and the all-pay auction tie-breaking rule. Economic Theory 35, 407–440 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-007-0249-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-007-0249-0

Keywords

JEL Classification Numbers

Navigation