Skip to main content
Log in

Revealing information in auctions: the allocation effect

  • Symposium
  • Published:
Economic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When there are two bidders, releasing independent information in an English auction with private values makes the seller worse off. However, this is no longer true with more bidders: when there is enough competition, revelation benefits the auctioneer. In three examples the dividing case is shown to be three bidders. This allocation effect applies to other standard auctions and parallels the bundling decision in a multi-unit auction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong M. (2000) Optimal multi-object auctions. Rev Econ Stud 67, 455–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergemann D., Pesendorfer M. (2003) Information structures in optimal auctions. Working paper, LSE

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulow J., Klemeperer P. (1996) Auctions versus negotiations. Am Econ Rev 86, 180–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty I. (1999) Bundling decision for selling multiple objects. Econ Theory 13, 723–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht-Wiggans R. (1988) On a possible benefit to bid takers from using multi-stage auctions. Manage Sci 34, 1109–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eso, P., Szentes, B.: Optimal information disclosure in auctions: the handicap auction. Rev Econ Stud (forthcoming) (2006)

  • Ganuza J.-J. (2004) Ignorance promotes competition: an auction model with endogenous private valuations. RAND J Econ 35, 583–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganuza J.-J., Penalva-Zuasti J. In information and competition in private value auctions. Working paper, Universitat Pompeu Fabra(2006)

  • Krishna V. (2002) Auction Theory. San Diego, Academic

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis T., Sappington D. (1994) Supplying information to facilitate price discrimination. Int Econ Rev 35, 309–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom P., Weber R. (1982) A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica 50, 1089–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom P. (2004) Putting Auction Theory to Work. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Palfrey T. (1983) Bundling decisions by a multiproduct monopolist with incomplete information. Econometrica 51, 463–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry M., Reny P. (1999) On the failure of the linkage principle in multi-unit auctions. Econometrica 67, 895–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persico N. (2000) Information acquisition in auctions. Econometrica 68, 135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezende, L.: Mid-auction information acquisition. Working paper, University of Illinois (2005)

  • Vagstad, S.: Should auctioneers supply early information fo prospective bidders. Int J Ind Organ (forthcoming) (2006)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Board.

Additional information

I would like to thank Jeremy Bulow, Willie Fuchs, Paul Klemperer, Rob McMillan, Phil Reny, Jeff Zwiebel and especially Andy Skrzypacz. I also grateful to two referees and an Associate Editor for a number of helpful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Board, S. Revealing information in auctions: the allocation effect. Econ Theory 38, 125–135 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-006-0177-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-006-0177-4

Keywords

JEL Classification Numbers

Navigation