Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prevalence of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity in older German men using recognized definitions: high accordance but low overlap!

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

The relevance of sarcopenia and sarcopenic Obesity (SO) is rising in our aging societies. Applying recognized definitions to 965 community-dwelling Bavarian men 70 years+ resulted in a prevalence for sarcopenia between 3.7 and 4.9 and between 2.1 and 4.1% for SO. Despite this high consistency, the overlap between the definitions/approaches was <50%.

Introduction

The relevance of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity (SO) is rising steadily in the aging societies of most developed nations. However, different definitions, components, and cutoff points hinder the evaluation of the prevalence of sarcopenia and SO. The purpose of this contribution was to determine the prevalence of sarcopenia and SO in a cohort of community-dwelling German men 70+ applying established sarcopenia (European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People, Foundation National Institute of Health, International Working Group on Sarcopenia) and obesity definitions. Further, we addressed the overlap between the definitions.

Methods

Altogether, 965 community-dwelling men 70 years and older living in Northern Bavaria, Germany, were assessed during the screening phase of the Franconian Sarcopenic Obesity project. Segmental multi-frequency bio-impedance analysis (BIA) was applied to determine weight and body composition.

Results

Applying the definitions of EWGSOP, IWGS, and FNIH, 4.9, 3.8, and 3.7% of the total cohort were classified as sarcopenic, respectively. When further applying body fat to diagnose obesity, SO prevalence in the total cohort ranged from 4.1% (EWGSOP + body fat >25%) to 2.1% (IWGS + body fat >30%). Despite the apparently high consistency of the approaches with respect to prevalence, the overlap in individual sarcopenia diagnosis between the sarcopenia definitions was rather low (<50%).

Conclusion

The prevalence of sarcopenia and SO in community-dwelling German men 70 years+ is relatively low (<5%) independently of the definition used. However, consistency of individual sarcopenia diagnosis varies considerably between the three definitions. Since sarcopenia is now recognized as an independent condition by the International Classification of Diseases, a mandatory definition must be stated.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT2857660.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Franconia is the northern part of Bavaria.

  2. We used the identical DXA scanner and the succeeding model of their BIA device (i.e., InBody770).

References

  1. Beaudart C, Zaaria M, Pasleau F, Reginster JY, Bruyere O (2017) Health outcomes of sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 12:e0169548

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Cauley JA (2015) An overview of sarcopenic obesity. J Clin Densitom 18:499–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stenholm S, Harris TB, Rantanen T, Visser M, Kritchevsky SB, Ferrucci L (2008) Sarcopenic obesity: definition, cause and consequences. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 11:693–700

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Zamboni M, Mazzali G, Fantin F, Rossi A, Di Francesco V (2008) Sarcopenic obesity: a new category of obesity in the elderly. Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases: NMCD 18:388–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Landi F, Topinkova E, Michel JP (2010) Understanding sarcopenia as a geriatric syndrome. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 13:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM et al (2010) Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing 39:412–423

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Fielding RA, Vellas B, Evans WJ et al (2011) Sarcopenia: an undiagnosed condition in older adults. Current consensus definition: prevalence, etiology, and consequences. International working group on sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc 12:249–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Studenski SA, Peters KW, Alley DE et al (2014) The FNIH sarcopenia project: rationale, study description, conference recommendations, and final estimates. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 69:547–558

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Peters DM, Fritz SL, Krotish DE (2013) Assessing the reliability and validity of a shorter walk test compared with the 10-Meter Walk Test for measurements of gait speed in healthy, older adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther 36:24–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N (1984) Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg [Am] 9:222–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kemmler W, Weineck J, Kalender WA, Engelke K (2004) The effect of habitual physical activity, non-athletic exercise, muscle strength, and VO2max on bone mineral density is rather low in early postmenopausal osteopenic women. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 4:325–334

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McAuley E, Konopack JF, Motl RW, Rosengren K, Morris KS (2005) Measuring disability and function in older women: psychometric properties of the late-life function and disability instrument. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 60:901–909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cesari M, Kritchevsky SB, Newman AB et al (2009) Added value of physical performance measures in predicting adverse health-related events: results from the Health, Aging And Body Composition Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 57:251–259

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lauretani F, Russo CR, Bandinelli S, Bartali B, Cavazzini C, Di Iorio A, Corsi AM, Rantanen T, Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L (2003) Age-associated changes in skeletal muscles and their effect on mobility: an operational diagnosis of sarcopenia. J Appl Physiol 95:1851–1860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim H, Hirano H, Edahiro A et al (2016) Sarcopenia: prevalence and associated factors based on different suggested definitions in community-dwelling older adults. Geriatrics & gerontology international 16(Suppl 1):110–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Baumgartner RN, Koehler KM, Gallagher D, Romero L, Heymsfield SB, Ross RR, Garry PJ, Lindeman RD (1998) Epidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico. Am J Epidemiol 147:755–763

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chien MY, Huang TY, Wu YT (2008) Prevalence of sarcopenia estimated using a bioelectrical impedance analysis prediction equation in community-dwelling elderly people in Taiwan. J Am Geriatr Soc 56:1710–1715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Newman AB, Kupelian V, Visser M, Simonsick E, Goodpaster B, Nevitt M, Kritchevsky SB, Tylavsky FA, Rubin SM, Harris TB (2003) Sarcopenia: alternative definitions and associations with lower extremity function. J Am Geriatr Soc 51:1602–1609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Delmonico MJ, Harris TB, Lee JS, Visser M, Nevitt M, Kritchevsky SB, Tylavsky FA, Newman AB (2007) Alternative definitions of sarcopenia, lower extremity performance, and functional impairment with aging in older men and women. J Am Geriatr Soc 55:769–774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Janssen I, Baumgartner RN, Ross R, Rosenberg IH, Roubenoff R (2004) Skeletal muscle cutpoints associated with elevated physical disability risk in older men and women. Am J Epidemiol 159:413–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Andrieu S et al (2009) Gait speed at usual pace as a predictor of adverse outcomes in community-dwelling older people an International Academy on Nutrition and Aging (IANA) Task Force. J Nutr Health Aging 13:881–889

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cawthon PM, Peters KW, Shardell MD et al (2014) Cutpoints for low appendicular lean mass that identify older adults with clinically significant weakness. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 69:567–575

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Alley DE, Shardell MD, Peters KW et al (2014) Grip strength cutpoints for the identification of clinically relevant weakness. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 69:559–566

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Batsis JA, Barre LK, Mackenzie TA, Pratt SI, Lopez-Jimenez F, Bartels SJ (2013) Variation in the prevalence of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity in older adults associated with different research definitions: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2004. J Am Geriatr Soc 61:974–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. WHO (2000) Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic Technical Report Series. WHO, Genf

    Google Scholar 

  26. Levine ME, Crimmins EM (2012) The impact of insulin resistance and inflammation on the association between sarcopenic obesity and physical functioning. Obesity (Silver Spring) 20:2101–2106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. BayLfStaD (2014) Statistisches Jahrbuch für Bayern 2014. In: Statistik BLf (ed) München

  28. DESTATIS (2015) Bildungsstand der Bevölkerung. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gunther CM, Burger A, Rickert M, Crispin A, Schulz CU (2008) Grip strength in healthy caucasian adults: reference values. The Journal of hand surgery 33:558–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bohannon RW, Williams Andrews A (2011) Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy 97:182–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. DESTATIS (2012) Verteilung der Bevölkerung auf Body-Mass-Index-Gruppen in Prozent. In: Bundesamt S (ed) Mikrozensus - Fragen zur Gesundheit. Statistisches Bundesamt, https://www.gbe-bund.de/stichworte/BMI.html

  32. Rütten A, Abu-Omar K, Lampert T, Ziese T (2005) Körperliche Aktivität. In: Robert-Koch-Institut (ed) Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes. Robert-Koch Institut, Berlin

  33. Masanes F, Culla A, Navarro-Gonzalez M, Navarro-Lopez M, Sacanella E, Torres B, Lopez-Soto A (2012) Prevalence of sarcopenia in healthy community-dwelling elderly in an urban area of Barcelona (Spain). J Nutr Health Aging 16:184–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kemmler W, Von Stengel S, Bebenek M, Sieber C, Freiberger E (2016) Prevalence of sarcopenic obesity in Germany using established definitions. Baseline data of the FORMOsA Study. Osteo Int 27:275–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Clynes MA, Edwards MH, Buehring B, Dennison EM, Binkley N, Cooper C (2015) Definitions of sarcopenia: associations with previous falls and fracture in a population sample. Calcif Tissue Int 97:445–452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Reijnierse EM, Trappenburg MC, Leter MJ et al (2015) The impact of different diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of sarcopenia in healthy elderly participants and geriatric outpatients. Gerontology 61:491–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Beaudart C, Reginster JY, Slomian J, Buckinx F, Locquet M, Bruyere O (2014) Prevalence of sarcopenia: the impact of different diagnostic cut-off limits. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 14:425–431

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Heimbüchel B, Gries M, Griep T (2015) Soziale Sicherheit im Vergleich. Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Landi F, Schneider SM et al (2014) Prevalence of and interventions for sarcopenia in ageing adults: a systematic review. Report of the International Sarcopenia Initiative (EWGSOP and IWGS). Age Ageing 43:748–759

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Kelly TL, Wilson KE, Heymsfield SB (2009) Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition reference values from NHANES. PLoS One 4:e7038

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Aubertin-Leheudre M, Lord C, Goulet ED, Khalil A, Dionne IJ (2006) Effect of sarcopenia on cardiovascular disease risk factors in obese postmenopausal women. Obesity (Silver Spring) 14:2277–2283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bouchard DR, Dionne IJ, Brochu M (2009) Sarcopenic/obesity and physical capacity in older men and women: data from the Nutrition as a Determinant of Successful Aging (NuAge)-the Quebec longitudinal Study. Obesity (Silver Spring) 17:2082–2088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yu S, Appleton S, Adams R, Chapman I, Wittert G, Visvanathan T, Visvanathan R (2014) The impact of low muscle mass definition on the prevalence of sarcopenia in older Australians. Biomed Res Int 2014:361790

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Beaudart C, Reginster JY, Slomian J, Buckinx F, Dardenne N, Quabron A, Slangen C, Gillain S, Petermans J, Bruyere O (2015) Estimation of sarcopenia prevalence using various assessment tools. Exp Gerontol 61:31–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pasma JH, Stijntjes M, Ou SS, Blauw GJ, Meskers CG, Maier AB (2014) Walking speed in elderly outpatients depends on the assessment method. Age (Dordr) 36:9736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lampert T, Kroll L, Müters S, Stolzenberg H (2013) Messung des sozioökonomischen Status in der Studie zur Gesundheit Erwachsener in Deutschland (DEGS1). Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz 56:631–636

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Robert-Koch-Institut (2005) Übergewicht und Adipositas. Robert-Koch-Institut, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ling CH, de Craen AJ, Slagboom PE, Gunn DA, Stokkel MP, Westendorp RG, Maier AB (2011) Accuracy of direct segmental multi-frequency bioimpedance analysis in the assessment of total body and segmental body composition in middle-aged adult population. Clin Nutr 30:610–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Buckinx F, Reginster JY, Dardenne N, Croisiser JL, Kaux JF, Beaudart C, Slomian J, Bruyere O (2015) Concordance between muscle mass assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis and by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:60

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J et al (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56:M146–M156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bijlsma AY, Meskers CG, van den Eshof N et al (2014) Diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia and physical performance. Age (Dordr) 36:275–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Schafer I, von Leitner EC, Schon G, Koller D, Hansen H, Kolonko T, Kaduszkiewicz H, Wegscheider K, Glaeske G, van den Bussche H (2010) Multimorbidity patterns in the elderly: a new approach of disease clustering identifies complex interrelations between chronic conditions. PLoS One 5:e15941

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank InBody Co. Ltd. (Seoul, Korea) which supplied the BIA device.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Kemmler.

Ethics declarations

The Institute of Medical Physics and the Institute of Biomedicine of Aging, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Germany, initiated the project, which was approved by the University Ethics Committee of the FAU (Ethikantrag 67_15b). After detailed information, all study participants gave written informed consent.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kemmler, W., Teschler, M., Weißenfels, A. et al. Prevalence of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity in older German men using recognized definitions: high accordance but low overlap!. Osteoporos Int 28, 1881–1891 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-3964-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-3964-9

Keywords

Navigation