Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical characteristics and risk factors of postoperative pneumonia after hip fracture surgery: a prospective cohort study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

In this study, we attempt to determine the clinical characteristic and risk factors of postoperative pneumonia (POP) after hip fracture surgery in a well-defined hip fracture cohort. We find that intrinsic factors as well as major clinical interventions were all important risk factors of POP.

Introduction

Postoperative pneumonia (POP) is one of the major complications following hip fractures surgery. However, the risk factors of POP are not well studied in hip fracture cohorts. We attempt to determine the clinical characteristic and risk factors of POP after hip fracture surgery in a well-defined hip fracture cohort.

Methods

Datasets from a prospective hip fracture cohort study with a 2-year follow-up period, from 2000 to 2011, were reanalyzed for characteristics of POP. Multivariate Cox proportional regression was used to evaluate the association between the incidence of POP and all-cause mortality. Multivariate logistic regression was used to screen for potential risk factors of POP by analyzing demographic factors, comorbidities, major clinical interventions, and hematological parameters.

Results

In 1429 patients who underwent hip surgery, the incidence of POP was 4.9 % (n = 70). All-cause mortality of patients with POP was significantly higher than that of patients without POP at 30 days (hazard ratio (HR) 3.05, 95 % confidence intervals (CI) 1.88–4.94), 1 year (HR 1.87, 95 % CI 1.41–2.48), and 2 years (HR 1.57, 95 % CI 1.23–1.99) postoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression showed that intrinsic factors (advanced age, anemia, diabetes, prior stroke, number of comorbidities, ASA score ≥III, and some laboratory biomarkers) as well as major clinical interventions were all significant risk factors for POP.

Conclusion

Intrinsic factors and major clinical interventions were all important risk factors of POP in patients after hip fracture surgery. Targeted preventive measures to mitigate the above risk factors may help in reducing the incidence of POP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrahamsen B, van Staa T, Ariely R, Olson M, Cooper C (2009) Excess mortality following hip fracture: a systematic epidemiological review. Osteoporos Int 20:1633–1650

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Klop C, Welsing PM, Cooper C, Harvey NC, Elders PJ, Bijlsma JW, Leufkens HG, de Vries F (2014) Mortality in British hip fracture patients, 2000–2010: a population-based retrospective cohort study. Bone 66:171–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Roche JJ, Wenn RT, Sahota O, Moran CG (2005) Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ 331:1374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaplan K, Miyamoto R, Levine BR, Egol KA, Zuckerman JD (2008) Surgical management of hip fractures: an evidence-based review of the literature. II: intertrochanteric fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16:665–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Miyamoto RG, Kaplan KM, Levine BR, Egol KA, Zuckerman JD (2008) Surgical management of hip fractures: an evidence-based review of the literature. I: femoral neck fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16:596–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu FK, Jiang CY, Shen J, Tang PF, Wang Y (2012) Preoperative predictors for mortality following hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury 43:676–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lawrence VA, Hilsenbeck SG, Noveck H, Poses RM, Carson JL (2002) Medical complications and outcomes after hip fracture repair. Arch Intern Med 162:2053–2057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pedersen SJ, Borgbjerg FM, Schousboe B, Pedersen BD, Jorgensen HL, Duus BR, Lauritzen JB (2008) A comprehensive hip fracture program reduces complication rates and mortality. J Am Geriatr Soc 56:1831–1838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L (2007) Increased mortality in patients with a hip fracture-effect of pre-morbid conditions and post-fracture complications. Osteoporos Int 18:1583–1593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lo IL, Siu CW, Tse HF, Lau TW, Leung F, Wong M (2010) Pre-operative pulmonary assessment for patients with hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 21:S579–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cakir Edis E, Hatipoglu ON, Yilmam I, Eker A, Tansel O, Sut N (2009) Hospital-acquired pneumonia developed in non-intensive care units. Respiration 78:416–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ji R, Shen H, Pan Y et al (2014) Risk score to predict hospital-acquired pneumonia after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke; J Cereb Circ 45:2620–2628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guzman-Herrador B, Molina CD, Allam MF, Navajas RF (2015) Independent risk factors associated with hospital-acquired pneumonia in an adult ICU: 4-year prospective cohort study in a university reference hospital. J Public Health (Oxf)

  14. Esperatti M, Ferrer M, Giunta V, Ranzani OT, Saucedo LM, Li Bassi G, Blasi F, Rello J, Niederman MS, Torres A (2013) Validation of predictors of adverse outcomes in hospital-acquired pneumonia in the ICU. Crit Care Med 41:2151–2161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sopena N, Sabria M, Neunos Study G (2005) Multicenter study of hospital-acquired pneumonia in non-ICU patients. Chest 127:213–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chawla R (2008) Epidemiology, etiology, and diagnosis of hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia in Asian countries. Am J Infect Control 36:S93–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. American Thoracic S, Infectious Diseases Society of A (2005) Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 171:388–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kieninger AN, Lipsett PA (2009) Hospital-acquired pneumonia: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Surg Clin North Am 89:439–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosencher N, Vielpeau C, Emmerich J, Fagnani F, Samama CM (2005) Venous thromboembolism and mortality after hip fracture surgery: the ESCORTE study. J Thromb Haemostasis: JTH 3:2006–2014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bergqvist D, Fredin H (1991) Pulmonary embolism and mortality in patients with fractured hips—a prospective consecutive series. Eur J Surg 157:571–574

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Huddleston JM, Gullerud RE, Smither F, Huddleston PM, Larson DR, Phy MP, Melton LJ 3rd, Roger VL (2012) Myocardial infarction after hip fracture repair: a population-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc 60:2020–2026

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Sopena N, Heras E, Casas I, Bechini J, Guasch I, Pedro-Botet ML, Roure S, Sabria M (2014) Risk factors for hospital-acquired pneumonia outside the intensive care unit: a case–control study. Am J Infect Control 42:38–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hung WW, Egol KA, Zuckerman JD, Siu AL (2012) Hip fracture management: tailoring care for the older patient. JAMA 307:2185–2194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Siu CW, Sun NC, Lau TW, Yiu KH, Leung F, Tse HF (2010) Preoperative cardiac risk assessment in geriatric patients with hip fractures: an orthopedic surgeons’ perspective. Osteoporos Int 21:S587–591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wong GT, Sun NC (2010) Providing perioperative care for patients with hip fractures. Osteoporos Int 21:S547–553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Barsoum WK, Helfand R, Krebs V, Whinney C (2006) Managing perioperative risk in the hip fracture patient. Cleve Clin J Med 73(Suppl 1):S46–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bohl DD, Basques BA, Golinvaux NS, Miller CP, Baumgaertner MR, Grauer JN (2014) Extramedullary compared with intramedullary implants for intertrochanteric hip fractures: thirty-day outcomes of 4432 procedures from the ACS NSQIP database. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:1871–1877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nathan SD, Reffett T, Brown AW, Fischer CP, Shlobin OA, Ahmad S, Weir N, Sheridan MJ (2013) The red cell distribution width as a prognostic indicator in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 143:1692–1698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Borne Y, Smith JG, Melander O, Engstrom G (2014) Red cell distribution width in relation to incidence of coronary events and case fatality rates: a population-based cohort study. Heart 100:1119–1124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Seretis C, Seretis F, Lagoudianakis E, Gemenetzis G, Salemis NS (2013) Is red cell distribution width a novel biomarker of breast cancer activity? Data from a pilot study. J Clin Med Res 5:121–126

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kurt YG, Cayci T, Aydin FN, Agilli M (2014) Is red cell distribution width a useful biomarker for risk assessment of diabetes mellitus? J Intern Med 276:537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yao J, Lv G (2014) Association between red cell distribution width and acute pancreatitis: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 4, e004721

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Poludasu S, Marmur JD, Weedon J, Khan W, Cavusoglu E (2009) Red cell distribution width (RDW) as a predictor of long-term mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Thromb Haemost 102:581–587

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zorlu A, Bektasoglu G, Guven FM, Dogan OT, Gucuk E, Ege MR, Altay H, Cinar Z, Tandogan I, Yilmaz MB (2012) Usefulness of admission red cell distribution width as a predictor of early mortality in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 109:128–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang YL, Hua Q, Bai CR, Tang Q (2011) Relationship between red cell distribution width and short-term outcomes in acute coronary syndrome in a Chinese population. Intern Med 50:2941–2945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tonelli M, Sacks F, Arnold M, Moye L, Davis B, Pfeffer M (2008) Relation between red blood cell distribution width and cardiovascular event rate in people with coronary disease. Circulation 117:163–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Patel KV, Ferrucci L, Ershler WB, Longo DL, Guralnik JM (2009) Red blood cell distribution width and the risk of death in middle-aged and older adults. Arch Intern Med 169:515–523

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Perlstein TS, Weuve J, Pfeffer MA, Beckman JA (2009) Red blood cell distribution width and mortality risk in a community-based prospective cohort. Arch Intern Med 169:588–594

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (31370947) and Doctorial Innovation Fund of Medical School of Chinese PLA (B13088).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to L. Zhang or P. Tang.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

H. Lv and P. Yin contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lv, H., Yin, P., Long, A. et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors of postoperative pneumonia after hip fracture surgery: a prospective cohort study. Osteoporos Int 27, 3001–3009 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3624-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3624-5

Keywords

Navigation