Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Adherence to raloxifene therapy: assessment methods and relationship with efficacy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Response to therapy depends on patient compliance but accurate assessment is difficult and adequate levels of adherence are uncertain. Adherence to raloxifene treatment may be assessed more accurately by electronic monitoring than by counting returned tablets. The level of adherence is positively associated with the degree of bone response.

Introduction

Adherence to study medication is usually estimated by counting returned tablets. This method relies on subjects’ honesty and may be inaccurate. We aimed to assess adherence more accurately, and examine its effect on measures of bone response, by using electronic monitoring.

Methods

Osteopenic women, ages 50 to 80, were prescribed daily raloxifene for 2 years. Electronic bottle caps (Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS), Aardex) recorded the date and time on opening. Returned tablets were also counted. We measured bone mineral density (BMD) in duplicate at the spine and hip at baseline and 2 years. We also measured urinary N-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX) at baseline, 1 and 2 years. We calculated the percentage changes in BMD and NTX from mean baseline to mean follow up measurements. Percentage adherence was assessed by both methods for 71 subjects that completed the study.

Results

The two methods correlated significantly (p <0.001, Spearman’s rho = 0.73) but the tablet count showed a higher median adherence than the MEMS caps (95.7 vs. 85.0 %, p <0.001), with greater divergence at lower adherence levels. MEMS adherence in 65 subjects with complete data correlated with NTX response (p <0.01, rho = −0.33) but with BMD response only at the femoral neck. However, adherence in the lowest quartile was associated with poorer BMD response at all sites (p <0.05).

Conclusion

Tablet counts may give similar results overall but conceal substantial individual non-adherence. Monitoring caps may assess adherence more accurately than tablet counts and would be the preferred method in clinical trials. The degree of adherence is associated with both bone turnover and BMD responses to anti-resorptive therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wu JR, Moser DK, De Jong MJ, Rayens MK, Chung ML, Riegel B, Lennie TA (2009) Defining an evidence-based cutpoint for medication adherence in heart failure. Am Heart J 157(2):285–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fielden SJ, Rusch ML, Yip B, Wood E, Shannon K, Levy AR, Montaner JS, Hogg RS (2008) Nonadherence increases the risk of hospitalization among HIV-infected antiretroviral naive patients started on HAART. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic) 7(5):238–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eastell R, Vrijens B, Cahall DL, Ringe JD, Garnero P, Watts NB (2011) Bone turnover markers and bone mineral density response with risedronate therapy: relationship with fracture risk and patient adherence. J Bone Miner Res 26(7):1662–1669

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Finigan J, Bainbridge PR, Eastell R (2001) Adherence to osteoporosis therapies. Bone 28(5):S239–S239

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caro JJ, Ishak KJ, Huybrechts KF, Raggio G, Naujoks C (2004) The impact of compliance with osteoporosis therapy on fracture rates in actual practice. Osteoporos Int 15(12):1003–1008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vrijens B, Vincze G, Kristanto P, Urquhart J, Burnier M (2008) Adherence to prescribed antihypertensive drug treatments: longitudinal study of electronically compiled dosing histories. BMJ 336(7653):1114–1119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Horne R et al. (2005) Concordance, adherence and compliance in medicine taking. Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R & D (NCCSDO)

  8. Grosset KA, Bone I, Reid JL, Grosset D (2006) Measuring therapy adherence in Parkinson’s disease: a comparison of methods. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77(2):249–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schwed A, Fallab CL, Burnier M, Waeber B, Kappenberger L, Burnand B, Darioli R (1999) Electronic monitoring of compliance to lipid-lowering therapy in clinical practice. J Clin Pharmacol 39(4):402–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. van Onzenoort HA, Verberk WJ, Kessels AG, Kroon AA, Neef C, van der Kuy PH, de Leeuw PW (2010) Assessing medication adherence simultaneously by electronic monitoring and pill count in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Am J Hypertens 23(2):149–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ettinger B et al (1999) Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene. JAMA 282(7):637–645

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clowes JA, Peel NF, Eastell R (2004) The impact of monitoring on adherence and persistence with antiresorptive treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89(3):1117–1123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Naylor KE, Clowes JA, Finigan J, Paggiosi MA, Peel NF, Eastell R (2010) The effect of cessation of raloxifene treatment on bone turnover in postmenopausal women. Bone 46(3):592–597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Baim S, Wilson CR, Lewiecki EM, Luckey MM, Downs RW Jr, Lentle BC (2005) Precision assessment and radiation safety for dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: position paper of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. J Clin Densitom 8(4):371–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cramer JA, Mattson RH, Prevey ML, Scheyer RD, Ouellette VL (1989) How often is medication taken as prescribed? A novel assessment technique. JAMA 261(22):3273–3277, Erratum in: JAMA 262(11):1472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zanchetta JR, Hakim C, Lombas C (2004) Observational study of compliance and continuance rates of raloxifene in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Curr Ther Res 65(6):470–480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilkes MM, Navickis RJ, Chan WW, Lewiecki EM (2010) Bisphosphonates and osteoporotic fractures: a cross-design synthesis of results among compliant/persistent postmenopausal women in clinical practice versus randomized controlled trials. Osteoporos Int 21(4):679–688

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chesnut CH et al (1995) Alendronate treatment of the postmenopausal osteoporotic woman: effect of multiple dosages on bone mass and bone remodeling. am j med 99(2):144–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Simmons MS, Nides MA, Rand CS, Wise RA, Tashkin DP (2000) Unpredictability of deception in compliance with physician-prescribed bronchodilator inhaler use in a clinical trial. Chest 118(2):290–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kruse W, Weber E (1990) Dynamics of drug regimen compliance: its assessment by microprocessor-based monitoring. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 38:561–565

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmitz JM, Sayre SL, Stotts AL, Rothfleisch J, Mooney ME (2005) Medication compliance during a smoking cessation clinical trial: a brief intervention using MEMS feedback. J Behav Med 28(2):139–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cotté F-E, Mercier F, De Pouvourville G (2008) Relationship between compliance and persistence with osteoporosis medications and fracture risk in primary health care in France: a retrospective case–control analysis. Clin Ther 30(12):2410–2422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yood RA, Emani S, Reed JI, Lewis BE, Charpentier M, Lydick E (2003) Compliance with pharmacologic therapy for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 14(12):965–968

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Siris ES, Selby PL, Saag KG, Borgström F, Herings RMC, Silverman SL (2009) Impact of osteoporosis treatment adherence on fracture rates in North America and Europe. Am J Med 122(2A):S3–S13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Siris ES, Harris ST, Rosen CJ (2006) Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy and fracture rates in osteoporotic women: relationship to vertebral and nonvertebral fractures from 2 US claims databases. Mayo Clin Proc 81:1013–1022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Briesacher BA, Andrade SE, Yood RA et al (2007) Consequences of poor compliance with bisphosphonates. Bone 41:882–887

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ross S, Samuels E, Gairy K, Iqbal S, Badamgarav E, Siris E (2011) A meta-analysis of osteoporotic fracture risk with medication nonadherence. Value Health 14(4):571–581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Weycker D, Macarios D, Edelsberg J, Oster G (2006) Compliance with drug therapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 17(11):1645–1652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tankó LB, Mouritzen U, Lehmann HJ, Warming L, Moelgaard A, Christgau S, Qvist P, Baumann M, Wieczorek L, Hoyle N, Christiansen C (2003) Oral ibandronate: changes in markers of bone turnover during adequately dosed continuous and weekly therapy and during different suboptimally dosed treatment regimens. Bone 32(6):687–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Eli Lilly Pharmaceuticals UK (unrestricted grant toward the clinical study).

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, Mellanby Centre for Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

    J. Finigan, K. Naylor, M. A. Paggiosi, N. F. Peel & R. Eastell

  2. Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, Metabolic Bone Centre, Northern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield, S5 7AU, UK

    J. Finigan

Authors
  1. J. Finigan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Naylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. A. Paggiosi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. N. F. Peel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. Eastell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Finigan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Finigan, J., Naylor, K., Paggiosi, M.A. et al. Adherence to raloxifene therapy: assessment methods and relationship with efficacy. Osteoporos Int 24, 2879–2886 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2386-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2386-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation