Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The direct cost of acute hip fracture care in care home residents in the UK

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Data on the true acute care costs of hip fractures for patients admitted from care homes are limited. Detailed costing analysis was undertaken for 100 patients. Median cost was £9,429 [€10,896], increasing to £14,435 [€16,681], for those requiring an upgrade from residential to nursing home care. Seventy-six percent of costs were attributable to hospital bed days, and therefore, interventions targeted at reducing hospital stay may be cost effective.

Introduction

Previous studies have estimated the costs associated with hip fracture, although these vary widely, and for patients admitted from care homes, who represent a significant fracture burden, there are limited data. The primary aim of this study was to perform a detailed assessment of the direct medical costs incurred and secondly compare this to the actual remuneration received by the hospital.

Methods

One hundred patients presenting from a care home in 2006 were randomly selected and a detailed case-note costing analysis was undertaken. This cost was then compared to the actual remuneration received by the hospital.

Results

Median cost per patient episode was £9,429 [€10,896] (all patients) range £4,292–162,324 [€4,960–187,582] (subdivided into hospital bed day costs £7,129 [€8,238], operative costs £1,323 [€1,529] and investigation costs £977 [€1,129]). Twenty-two percent of the patients admitted from a residential home required upgrading to a nursing home. In this group, the median length of stay was 31 days (mean 38, range 10–88) median cost £14,435 [€16,681]. Average remuneration received equated to £6,222 [€7,190] per patient. This represents a mean loss in income, compared to actual calculated costs of £3,207 [€3,706] per patient.

Conclusion

The median cost was £9,429 [€10,896], increasing to £14,435 [€16,681], for those requiring an upgrade from residential to nursing home care at discharge. Significant cost differences were seen comparing the actual cost to remuneration received. Interventions targeted at reducing length of stay may be cost effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dolan P, Torgerson DJ (1988) The cost of treating osteoporosis in the United Kingdom female population. Osteoporos Int 8:611–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. http://www.ccad.org.uk/nhfd.nsf/NHFD_National_Report_Extended_2010.pdf

  3. Campion EW, Jette AM, Cleary PD, Harris BA (1987) Hip fracture: a prospective study of hospital course, complications, and costs. J Gen Intern Med 2(2):78–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacobs MJ, Markel DC (1999) Geriatric intertrochanteric hip fractures: an economic analysis. Am J Orthop 28(10):573–576

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Haentjens P, Autier P, Barette P, Boonen S (2003) Costs of care after hospital discharge among women with a femoral neck fracture. Clin Orthop 414:250–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wiktorowicz ME, Goeree R, Papaioannou A et al (2001) Economic implications of hip fracture: health service use, institutional care and cost in Canada. Osteoporos Int 12(4):271–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Borgquist L, Lindelow G, Thorngren KG (1991) Costs of hip fracture. Rehabilitation of 180 patients in primary health care. Acta Orthop Scand 62(1):39–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Braithwaite RS, Col NF, Wong JB (2003) Estimating hip fracture morbidity, mortality and costs. J Am Geriatr Soc 51(3):364–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4127649 (2005)

  10. Lawrence TM, White CT, Wenn R, Moran CG (2005) The current hospital costs of treating hip fractures. Injury 36:88–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Robbins JA, Donaldson LJ (1984) Analysing stages of care in hospital stay for fractured neck of femur. Lancet 2:1028–1029

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Farnworth MG, Kenny P, Shiell A (1994) The costs and effects of early discharge in the management of fractured hip. Age Ageing 23(3):190–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hollingworth W, Todd C, Parker M et al (1993) Cost analysis of early discharge after hip fracture. BMJ 307:903–906

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. DIPART (vitamin D Individual Patient Analysis of Randomized Trials) Group (2009) Patient level pooled analysis of 68 < thin > 500 patients from seven major vitamin D fracture trials in US and Europe. BMJ 339:b5463

    Google Scholar 

  15. Avenell A, Gillespie WJ, Gillespie LD, O’Connell D (2009) Vitamin D and vitamin D analogues for preventing fractures associated with involutional and post menopausal osteoporosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev;(2):CD000227

  16. Glerup H, Mikkelsen K, Poulsen L, Hass E, Overbeck S, Andersen H, Charles P, Eriksen EF (2000) Hypovitaminosis D myopathy without biochemical signs of osteomalacic bone involvement. Calcif Tissue Int 66:419–424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Dawson-Hughes B, Staehelin HB, Orav JE, Stuck AE, Theiler R, Wong JB, Egli A, Kiel DP, Henschkowski J (2009) Fall prevention with supplemental and active forms of vitamin D: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 339:b3692

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Sahota.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sahota, O., Morgan, N. & Moran, C.G. The direct cost of acute hip fracture care in care home residents in the UK. Osteoporos Int 23, 917–920 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1651-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1651-9

Keywords

Navigation