Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Ontario Osteoporosis Strategy: implementation of a population-based osteoporosis action plan in Canada

  • Position Paper
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last decade, there have been a number of action plans published to highlight the importance of preventing osteoporosis and related fractures. In the province of Ontario Canada, the Ministry of Health provided funding for the Ontario Osteoporosis Strategy. The goal is to reduce morbidity, mortality, and costs from osteoporosis and related fractures through an integrated and comprehensive approach aimed at health promotion and disease management. This paper describes the components of the Ontario Osteoporosis Strategy and progress on implementation efforts as of March 2009. There are five main components: health promotion; bone mineral density testing, access, and quality; postfracture care; professional education; and research and evaluation. Responsibility for implementation of the initiatives within the components is shared across a number of professional and patient organizations and academic teaching hospitals with osteoporosis researchers. The lessons learned from each phase of the development, implementation, and evaluation of the Ontario Osteoporosis Strategy provides a tremendous opportunity to inform other jurisdictions embarking on implementing similar large-scale bone health initiatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Curtis JR, Adachi JD, Saag KG (2009) Bridging the osteoporosis quality chasm. J Bone Min Res 24:3–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Compston J (2004) Action plan for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures in the European Community. Osteoporos Int 15:259–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Raisz LG, Elderkin AL, Schargorodski L, Hart T, Waldman C, King T, Noonan AS (2009) A call to action: developing and implementing a national action plan to improve bone health. Osteoporos Int 20:1805–1806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jaglal SB, Weller I, Mamdami M, Hawker G, Kreder H, Jaakkimainen L, Adachi R (2005) Population trends in bone density testing, treatment and hip and wrist fracture rates: are the hip fracture projections wrong? JBMR 20(6):898–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Giangregorio L, Papaioannou A, Crraney A, Zytaruk N, Adachi JD (2006) Fragility fractures and the osteoporosis care gap: an international phenomenon. Semin Arthritis Rheum 35:293–305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Papaioannou A, Kennedy CC, Ioannidis G, Gao Y, Sawka AM, Goltzman D, Tenenhouse A, Pickard L, Olszynski WP, Davison KS, Kaiser S, Josse RG, Kreiger N, Hanley DA, Prior JC, Brown JP, Anastassiades T, Adachi JD, CaMos Research Group (2008) The osteoporosis care gap in men with fragility fractures: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int 19(4):581–587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Siminoski K, Leslie WD, Frame H, Hodsman A, Josse RG, Khan A, Lentle BC, Levesque J, Lyons DJ, Tarulli G, Brown J (2005) Recommendations for bone mineral density reporting in Canada. Can Assoc Rad J 56:178–188

    Google Scholar 

  8. Waugh EJ, Lam MA, Hawker GA, McGowan J, Papaioannou A, Cheung AM, Hodsman AB, Leslie WD, Siminoski K, Jamal SA, Perimenopause BMD Guidelines Subcommittee of Osteoporosis Canada (2009) Risk factors for low bone mass in healthy 40-60 year old women: a systematic review of the literature. Osteoporos Int 20(1):1–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Papaioannou A, Kennedy CC, Cranney A, Hawker G, Brown JP, Kaiser SM, Leslie WD, O’Brien CJM, Sawka AM, Khan A, Siminoski K, Tarulli G, Webster D, McGowan J, Adachi JD (2009) Risk factors for low BMD in healthy men age 50 years or older: a systematic review. Osteopor Int 20(4):507–518

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Center JR, Bliuc D, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA (2007) Risk of subsequent fracture after low-trauma fracture in men and women. JAMA 297(4):387–394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bogoch ER, Elliot-Gibson V, Beaton DE, Jamal SA, Josse RG, Murray TM (2006) Effective initiation of osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment for patients with a fragility fracture in an orthopaedic environment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(1):25–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dickson L, Cameron C, Hawker G, Ratansi A, Radziunas I, Bansod V, Jaglal S (2008) Development of a multidisciplinary osteoporosis telehealth program. Telemed e-Health 14(5):473–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jaglal SB, Hawker G, Bansod V, Salbach NM, Zwarenstein M, Carroll J, Brooks D, Cameron C, Bogoch E, Jaakkimainen L, Kreder H (2009) A demonstration project of a multi-component educational intervention to improve integrated post-fracture osteoporosis care in five rural communities in Ontario, Canada. Osteoporos Int 20(2):265–274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Giangregorio LM, Jantzi M, Papaioannou A, Hirdes J, Maxwell CJ, Poss JW (2009) Osteoporosis management among residents living in long-term care. Osteoporos Int 20(9):1471–1478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. ACOVE Quality Indicators (2001) Ann Intern Med 135:653–667

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grossman JM, MacLean CH (2001) Quality indicators for the management of osteoporosis in vulnerable elders. Ann Intern Med 135:722–730

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McKinley ED, Thompson JW, Briefer-French J, Wilcox LS, Weisman CS, Andrews WC (2001) Performance indicators in women’s health: incorporating women’s health in the health plan employer data and information set (HEDIS). Women’s Health Issues 2(1):46–58

    Google Scholar 

  18. National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) (2005) HEDIS 2006. Health plan employer data and information set. Vol. 2, technical specifications. National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), Washington DC, p 350

    Google Scholar 

  19. National Quality Forum www.qualityforum.org (accessed October 29, 2009)

  20. Rubenstein LZ, Powers CM, MacLean CH (2001) Quality indicators for the management and prevention of falls and mobility problems in vulnerable elders. Ann Intern Med 135:686–693

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Ministry of Health in Ontario for their support of the Ontario Osteoporosis Strategy. Dr. Susan Jaglal holds the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute Chair at the University of Toronto. Dr. Gillian Hawker holds the F.M. Hill Chair in Academic Women’s Medicine. Dr. Alexandra Papiaoannou holds the Eli Lilly Canada Research Chair in Osteoporosis.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. B. Jaglal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jaglal, S.B., Hawker, G., Cameron, C. et al. The Ontario Osteoporosis Strategy: implementation of a population-based osteoporosis action plan in Canada. Osteoporos Int 21, 903–908 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1206-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1206-5

Keywords

Navigation