Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Age, cohort and period effects on hip fracture incidence: analysis and predictions from New Zealand data 1974-2007

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Hip fractures are substantial problem worldwide. The increase in rate with age does not continue into very old age. Rates decline in successive birth cohorts. If the increasing trend in period effect continues, there will be a substantial increase in hip fracture incidence.

Introduction

The purpose of this study is to (1) determine incidence rates for fracture neck of femur (FNF) for the period 1974-2007, (2) estimate age, cohort, and period effects, and (3) predict the burden of FNF in 2025.

Methods

Age adjusted incidence rates were estimated using New Zealand hospital discharge data for 1974-2007. Age-period-cohort modeling was used to estimate individual effects of these factors after adjusting for the other two factors. Future fracture burden was estimated under two scenarios.

Results

Age-adjusted rates for women increased from 1974 to 1987 whereas rates for men have increased from 1974 until 2007. Risk increased from 70 years of age but dropped among the very elderly. Period effects showed a steady increase in risk throughout 1974-2007. In contrast, the risk was lower in later cohorts. If there is no change in the period effect from 2007 we estimate a reduction in the burden of illness from FNF, especially for women. However if the period effect continues to increase, there will be substantial increases in FNF incidence, especially for men.

Conclusions

The effect of population aging on FNF incidence is predictable because projections are based on an existing population. The increasing health and improvement in measures of physical status of older people through the last century, explain the decline in FNF incidence in later cohorts. The steady increase in period effect may be due to increased survival of the very frail. This burden of illness resulting from FNFs must be addressed by population based, research proven approaches to fall and fracture prevention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis JA (1997) World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 7(5):407–413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Palvanen M, Vuori I, Jarvinen M (1999) Hip fractures in Finland between 1970 and 1997 and predictions for the future [see comment]. Lancet 353(9155):802–805

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Martyn CN, Cooper C (1999) Prediction of burden of hip fracture [comment]. Lancet 353(9155):769–770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stephenson S, Langley J, Campbell J, Gillespie W (2003) Upward trends in the incidence of neck of femur fractures in the elderly [comment]. N Z Med J 116(1185):U665

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Langley JD, Stephenson S, Cryer C, Borman B (2002) Traps for the unwary in estimating person based injury incidence using hospital discharge data. Inj Prev 8:332–337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Holford TR (1991) Understanding the effect of age, period, and cohort on incidence and mortality rates. Annu Rev Public Health 12:425–457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Robertson C, Gandini S, Boyle P (1999) Age-period-cohort models: a comparative study of available methodologies. J Clin Epidemiol 52(6):569–583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McNally RJQ, Alexander FE, Staines A, Cartwright RA (1997) A comparison of three methods of analysis of age-period-cohort models with application to incidence data on non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Int J Epidemiol 26(1):32–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang Y, Fu WJ, Land KC (2004) A methodological comparison of age-period-cohort models: the intrinsic estimator and conventional generalized linear models. Sociol Method 34(1):75–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. STATA (2007) Stata Statistical Software: release 10. In: LP S, editor. College Station, Texas StataCorp

  11. Johnell O, Kanis JA (2004) An estimate of the world wide prevalance, mortality and disability associated with hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 15:897–902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwenkglenks M, Lippuner K, Hauselmann HJ, Szucs Thomas D (2005) A model of osteoporosis impact in Switzerland 2000-2020. Osteoporos Int 16:659–671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Couris CM, Duclos A, Rabilloud M, Couray-Targe S, Ecochard R, Delmas PD et al (2007) A seventy percent overestimation of the burden of hip fractures in women aged 85 and over. Bone 41(5):896–900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chang KP, Center JR, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA (2004) Incidence of Hip and other osteoporotic fractures in elderly men and women: Dubbo osteoporosis epidemiology study. J Bone Miner Res 19(4):532–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Oeppen J, Vaupel JW (2002) Broken limits to life expectancy. Science 296:1029–1031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sameison EJ, Zhang Y, Kiel D, Hannan MT, Felson D (2002) Effect of birth cohort on risk of hip fracture: age-specific incidence rates in the Farmingham study. Am J Public Health 92(5):858–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Evans JG, Seagroatt V, Goldacre MJ (1997) Secular trends in proximal femoral fracture, Oxford record linkage study area and England 1968-86. J Epidemiol Community Health 51:424–429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Svanborg A (1988) The health of the elderly population: results from longitudinal studies with age-cohort comparisons. In: Evered D, Whelan J (eds) Research and the ageing population. Wiley, Chichester, pp 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yang Y, Lewis J, Epstein S, Metz D (2006) Long-term proton pump inhibitor therapy and risk of hip fracture. J Am Med Assoc 296(24):2947–2953

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jaglal SB, Weller I, Mamdani M, Hawker G, Kreder H, Jaakkimainen L et al (2005) Population trends in BMD testing, treatment, and hip and wrist fracture rates: are the hip fracture projections wrong? J Bone Miner Res 20(6):898–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nymark T, Lauritsen JM, Ovesen O, Rock ND, Jeune B (2006) Decreasing incidence of hip fracture in the Funen County, Denmark. Acta Orthopaedica 77(1):109–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Campbell A, Robertson MC (2007) Rethinking individual and community fall prevention strategies: a meta-regression comparing single and multifactorial interventions. Age Ageing 36:656–662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Boufous S, Finch C, Close J, Day L, Lord S (2007) Hospital admissions following presentations to emergency departments for a fracture in older people. Inj Prev 13:211–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Boufous S, Finch C (2005) Estimating the incidence of hospitalized injurious falls: impact of varying case definitions [erratum appears in Inj Prev. 2006 Apr;12(2):135]. Inj Prev 11(6):334–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Du W, Hayen A, Finch C, Hatfield J (2008) Comparison of methods to correct the miscounting of multiple episodes of care when estimating the incidence of hospitalised injury in child motor vehicle passengers. Accident Anal Prev 40(4):1563–1568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gedeborg R, Engquist H, Berglund L, Michaelsson K (2008) Identification of incident injuries in hospital discharge registers. Epidemiology 19(6):860–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kupper LL, Janis JM, Salama IA, Yoshizawa CN, Greenberg BG (1983) Age-Period-cohort analysis: an illustration of problems in assessing interaction in one observation per cell data. Commun Stat Theory Methods 12(23):2779–2807

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jackson JE (2003) A user's guide to principal components. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jolliffe IT (1982) A note on the use of principal components regression. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 31(3):300–303

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hadi AS, Ling RF (1998) Some cautionary notes on the use of principal components regression. Am Stat 52(1):15–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Ministry of Health for providing the hospital discharge data and Statistics New Zealand for the population estimates.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Funding

This work was supported by the Health Research Council of New Zealand (07/052).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Injury Prevention Research Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand

    J. Langley, A. Samaranayaka & G. Davie

  2. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

    A. J. Campbell

Authors
  1. J. Langley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Samaranayaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Davie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. J. Campbell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Langley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langley, J., Samaranayaka, A., Davie, G. et al. Age, cohort and period effects on hip fracture incidence: analysis and predictions from New Zealand data 1974-2007. Osteoporos Int 22, 105–111 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1205-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1205-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation