Skip to main content
Log in

Cross-geographic region differences in quality of life in women with and without vertebral fracture

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Not much is known about cross-geographic region differences in quality of life (QoL) in women with and without prevalent vertebral fractures (VFX). QoL differed between continents, countries, and ethnicities. The observed differences in QoL mostly appeared larger than the difference in QoL between women with or without mild to moderate VFX.

Introduction

Quality of life (QoL) is an increasingly important outcome measure in randomized controlled trials and cost-utility studies. However, not much is known about cross-geographic region differences in QoL. The objective of this study was to describe the cross-geographic region differences in QoL in women with and without mild to moderate prevalent vertebral fractures (VFX).

Methods

The study was performed using baseline data of the bazedoxifene study. The study was carried out in 25 countries in six continents (n = 7117). QoL was assessed using the index and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores of the EQ-5D, Qualeffo-41, and Women's Health Questionnaire (WHQ). VFX were assessed using semi-quantitative and quantitative morphometric methods.

Results

In general, all four instruments followed more or less the same pattern. In most analyses, the reported QoL was lowest in Asia and Europe and highest in North America and Oceania. To examine the influence of ethnicity, North and South America were stratified on race. In both continents, a lower QoL was observed in Hispanic people.

Conclusions

QoL differed between continents, countries, and ethnicities. The observed differences in QoL appeared larger between most continents and countries than the difference in QoL between women with or without mild to moderate VFX.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hasserius R, Redlund-Johnell I, Mellstrom D et al (2001) Vertebral deformation in urban Swedish men and women - Prevalence based on 797 subjects. Acta Orthop Scand 72:273–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jones G, White C, Nguyen T et al (1996) Prevalent vertebral deformities: Relationship to bone mineral density and spinal osteophytosis in elderly men and women. Osteoporos Int 6:233–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lau EMC, Woo J, Chan H et al (1998) The health consequences of vertebral deformity in elderly Chinese men and women. Calcif Tissue Int 63:1–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Melton LJIII, Lane AW, Cooper C et al (1993) Prevalence and incidence of vertebral deformities. Osteoporos Int 3:113–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pluijm SM, Tromp AM, Smit JH et al (2000) Consequences of vertebral deformities in older men and women. J Bone Miner Res 15:1564–1572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Silverman SL (1992) The clinical consequences of vertebral compression fracture. Bone 13(Suppl 2):S27–S31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hall SE, Criddle RA, Comito TL et al (1999) A case-control study of quality of life and functional impairment in women with long-standing vertebral osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 9:508–515

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ross PD (1997) Clinical consequences of vertebral fractures. Am J Med 103:30S–42S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ross PD, Davis JW, Epstein RS et al (1994) Pain and disability associated with new vertebral fractures and other spinal conditions. J Clin Epidemiol 47:231–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Adachi JD, Loannidis G, Berger C et al (2001) The influence of osteoporotic fractures on health-related quality of life in community-dwelling men and women across Canada. Osteoporos Int 12:903–908

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cockerill W, Lunt M, Silman AJ et al (2004) Health-related quality of life and radiographic vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 15:113–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D et al (1999) Quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures. Validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Osteoporos Int 10:150–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Oleksik A, Lips P, Dawson A et al (2000) Health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women with low BMD with or without prevalent vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 15:1384–1392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Silverman SL, Minshall ME, Shen W et al (2001) The relationship of health-related quality of life to prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation Study. Arthritis Rheum 44:2611–2619

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tosteson AN, Gabriel SE, Grove MR et al (2001) Impact of hip and vertebral fractures on quality-adjusted life years. Osteoporos Int 12:1042–1049

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brooks R, Rabin R, de Charro F (eds) (2003) The measurement and valuation of health status using EQ-5D: A European perspective. Kluwer, Boston

  17. Dolan P (1997) Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 35:1095–1108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D et al (1997) Quality of life as outcome in the treatment of osteoporosis: the development of a questionnaire for quality of life by the European Foundation for Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 7:36–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hunter MS (2003) The Women's Health Questionnaire (WHQ): Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ). Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hunter M (1992) The Womens Health Questionnaire—a measure of mid-aged womens perceptions of their emotional and physical health. Psychology & Health 7:45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Avis NE, Ory M, Matthews KA et al (2003) Health-related quality of life in a multiethnic sample of middle-aged women—Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Medical Care 41:1262–1276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gupta P, Sturdee DW, Hunter MS (2006) Mid-age health in women from the Indian subcontinent (MAHWIS): general health and the experience of menopause in women. Climacteric 9:13–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Alonso J, Ferrer M, Gandek B et al (2004) Health-related quality of life associated with chronic conditions in eight countries: results from the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Qual Life Res 13:283–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. M. van Schoor.

Additional information

Funding

The study was funded by Wyeth Research, Collegeville, Pennsylvania. The VU University Medical Center was one of the participating centers. Natasja van Schoor was funded by an unconditional grant from Wyeth; Joel Bobula is an employee of Wyeth and has stock ownership in Wyeth; Holly Yu is an employee of Wyeth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Schoor, N.M., Yu, H., Bobula, J. et al. Cross-geographic region differences in quality of life in women with and without vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 20, 1759–1766 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-0853-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-0853-x

Keywords

Navigation