Skip to main content
Log in

Muscle power is related to tibial bone strength in older women

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

We enrolled 65 to 75 year-old community-dwelling women and measured muscle power, strength, physical activity using accelerometry and tibial bone strength using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT). Muscle power contributed 6.6% of the variance in the bone strength–strain index and 8.9% in the section modulus after accounting for age, height, weight, and physical activity; moderate to vigorous physical activity was related to muscle power in the lower extremity.

Introduction

Muscle power is associated with DXA measurements of bone mass, but it is not known whether muscle power is associated with bone strength. There are no reports of investigations that have tested the effect of muscle power on bone compartments using advanced imaging.

Methods

We enrolled 74 community-dwelling women aged 65–75 years. We measured muscle power and strength of leg extension using Keiser air-pressure resistance equipment. All participants wore a waist-mounted Actigraph accelerometer to record physical activity. We used peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) to measure tibial mid-shaft (50% of the site) bone strength (strength–strain index, section modulus). We used Pearson correlations and multi-level linear regression to investigate the associations between muscle and bone.

Results

Muscle power contributed 6.6% (p = 0.007) of the variance in the bone strength–strain index and 8.9% (p = 0.001) the variance in the section modulus in older women after accounting for age, height, weight, and physical activity. Moderate to vigorous physical activity was significantly related to muscle power in the lower extremity (r = 0.260; p = 0.041).

Conclusion

Muscle power significantly contributed to the variance in estimated bone strength. Whether power training will prove to be a more effective stimulus for bone strength than conventional strength training will require further studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martyn-St James M, Carroll S (2002) High-intensity resistance training and post-menopausal bone loss: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 17:1225–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wallace B, Cumming R (2000) Systematic review of randomized trials of the effect of exercise on bone mass in pre- and postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 67:10–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wolff I, van Croonenborg JJ, Kemper HCG et al (1999) The effect of exercise training on bone mass: a meta-analysis of published controlled trials in pre and postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 9:1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahlborg HG, Johnell O, Turner CH et al (2003) Bone loss and bone size after menopause. N Engl J Med 349:327–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Campbell AJ, Borrie MJ, Spears GF (1989) Risk factors for falls in a community-based prospective study of people 70 years and older. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 44:M112–M117

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Moreland JD, Richardson JA, Goldsmith CH et al (2004) Muscle weakness and falls in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc 52:1121–1129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Earles DR, Judge JO, Gunnarsson OT (2001) Velocity training induces power-specific adaptations in highly functioning older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82:872–878

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Henwood TR, Taaffe DR (2005) Improved physical performance in older adults undertaking a short-term programme of high-velocity resistance training. Gerontology 51:108–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De Vos NJ, Singh NA, Ross DA et al (2005) Optimal load for increasing muscle power during explosive resistance training in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 60:638–647

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Orr R, de Vos NJ, Singh NA et al (2006) Power training improves balance in healthy older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 61:78–85

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Signorile JF, Carmel MP, Czaja SJ et al (2002) Differential increases in average isokinetic power by specific muscle groups of older women due to variations in training and testing. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 57:M683–M690

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fielding RA, LeBrasseur NK, Cuoco A et al (2002) High-velocity resistance training increases skeletal muscle peak power in older women. J Am Geriatr Soc 50:655–662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Miszko TA, Cress ME, Slade JM et al (2003) Effect of strength and power training on physical function in community-dwelling older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 58:171–175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bottaro M, Machado SN, Nogueira W et al (2007) Effect of high versus low-velocity resistance training on muscular fitness and functional performance in older men. Eur J Appl Physiol 99:257–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Skelton DA, Greig CA, Davies JM et al (1994) Strength, power and related functional ability of healthy people aged 65–89 years. Age Ageing 23:371–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Seynnes O, Fiatarone Singh MA, Hue O et al (2004) Physiological and functional responses to low-moderate versus high-intensity progressive resistance training in frail elders. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 59:503–509

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pruitt LA, Taaffe DR, Marcus R (1995) Effects of a one-year high-intensity versus low-intensity resistance training program on bone mineral density in older women. J Bone Miner Res 10:1788–1795

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sullivan DH, Roberson PK, Johnson LE et al (2005) Effects of muscle strength training and testosterone in frail elderly males. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37:1664–1672

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stengel SV, Kemmler W, Pintag R et al (2005) Power training is more effective than strength training for maintaining bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. J Appl Physiol 99:181–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Von Stengel S, Kemmler W, Lauber D et al (2007) Differential effects of strength versus power training on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women—a two year longitudinal study. Br J Sports Med 41:649–655; discussion 655.Erratum 41:926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vainionpaa A, Korpelainen R, Sievanen H et al (2007) Effect of impact exercise and its intensity on bone geometry at weight-bearing tibia and femur. Bone 40:604–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Genant HK, Engelke K, Fuerst T et al (1996) Non-invasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: state of the art. J Bone Miner Res 11:707–730

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Groll DL, To T, Bombardier C et al (2005) The development of a comorbidity index with physical function as the outcome. J Clin Epidemiol 58:595–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Washburn R, Smith K, Jette A et al (1993) The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): development and evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol 52:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ward DS, Evenson KR, Vaughn A et al (2005) Accelerometer use in physical activity: best practices and research recommendations. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37 [11 Suppl]:S582–S588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Swartz AM, Strath SJ, Bassett DR Jr et al (2000) Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32 [9 Suppl]:S450–S456

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bean JF, Kiely DK, Herman S et al (2002) The relationship between leg power and physical performance in mobility-limited older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 50:461–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sievänen H, Koskue V, Rauhio A et al (1998) Peripheral quantitative computed tomography in human long bones: evaluation of in vitro and in vivo precision. J Bone Miner Res 13:871–882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rantalainen T, Heinonen A, Komi PV, Linnamo V (2008) Neuromuscular performance and bone structural characteristics in young healthy men and women. Eur J Appl Physiol 102:215–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu-Ambrose TY, Khan KM, Eng JJ et al (2004) Both resistance and agility training increase cortical bone density in 75- to 85-year-old women with low bone mass: a 6-month randomized controlled trial. J Clin Densitom 7:390–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Andrews AW, Thomas MW, Bohannon RW (1996) Normative values for isometric muscle force measurements obtained with hand-held dynamometers. Phys Ther 76:248–259

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Judex S, Zernicke RF (2000) High-impact exercise and growing bone: relation between high strain rates and enhanced bone formation. J Appl Physiol 88:2183–2191

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mosley JR, Lanyon LE (1998) Strain rate as a controlling influence on adaptive modeling in response to dynamic loading of the ulna in growing male rats. Bone 23:313–318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Turner CH, Owan I, Takano Y (1995) Mechanotransduction in bone: role of strain rate. Am J Physiol 269:E438–E442

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Burger EH, Klein-Nulend J (1999) Mechanotransduction in bone—role of the lacuno-canalicular network. FASEB J 13:S101–S112

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Macdonald H, Kontulainen S, Petit M et al (2006) Bone strength and its determinants in pre- and early pubertal boys and girls. Bone 39:598–608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Boussuge PY, Rance M, Bedu M et al (2006) Peak leg muscle power, peak VO2 and its correlates with physical activity in 57 to 70-year-old women. Eur J Appl Physiol 96:10–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gauchard GC, Tessier A, Jeandel C et al (2003) Improved muscle strength and power in elderly exercising regularly. Int J Sports Med 24:71–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kostka T, Bonnefoy M, Arsac LM et al (1991) Habitual physical activity and peak anaerobic power in elderly women. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 76:81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kostka T, Rahmani A, Berthouze SE et al (2000) Quadriceps muscle function in relation to habitual physical activity and VO2 max in men and women aged more than 65 years. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 55:B481–B488

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dr. Ashe and Dr. Liu-Ambrose are Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (MSFHR) Scholars, Dr. Khan is a Canadian Institute of Health (CIHR) New Investigator and Dr. McKay is a MSFHR Senior Scholar. Vancouver Foundation (BCMSF, Operating Grant BCM06-0035), CIHR and MSFHR (Establishment Grant) supported this study. The Canada Foundation for Innovation funded equipment (Center for Hip Health and Mobility, IF, RHF 2004). We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of our participants.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. C. Ashe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ashe, M.C., Liu-Ambrose, T.Y.L., Cooper, D.M.L. et al. Muscle power is related to tibial bone strength in older women. Osteoporos Int 19, 1725–1732 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0655-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0655-6

Keywords

Navigation