Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impaired muscle strength is associated with fractures in hemodialysis patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Fractures are extremely common among hemodialysis (HD) patients.

Methods

To assess if bone mineral density (BMD) and/or tests of muscle strength were associated with fractures, we studied 37 men and 15 women, 50 years and older, on HD for at least 1 year. We excluded subjects with prior renal transplants and women taking hormone replacement therapy. We inquired about low-trauma fractures since starting dialysis. Subjects underwent BMD testing with a Lunar DPX-L densitometer. Tests of muscle strength included: timed up and go (TUG), 6-min walk, functional reach, and grip strength. Lateral and thoracic radiographs of the spine were obtained and reviewed for prevalent vertebral fractures. We used logistic regression to examine associations between fracture (prevalent vertebral, self-reported low trauma since starting dialysis and/or both) and BMD, and fracture and muscle-strength tests. Analyses were adjusted for age, weight, and gender.

Results

Mean age was 66±9.0 years, mean weight was 72.9±15.2 kg, and most (35 of 52) participants were Caucasian. Average duration of dialysis was 40.2 (interquartile range: 24–61.2) months. The most common cause of renal failure was diabetes (16 subjects). There were no differences by gender or fracture. Of the 52 subjects, 27 had either a vertebral fracture or low trauma fracture. There was no association between fractures, hip or spine BMD, or grip strength. In contrast, greater functional reach [odds ratio (OR) per standard deviation (SD) increase: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.13–0.69), quicker TUG (OR per SD decrease: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.11–0.23), and a greater distance walked in 6 min (OR per SD increase: 0.10; 95% CI: 0.03–0.36) were all associated with a reduced risk of fracture.

Conclusions

Impaired neuromuscular function is associated with fracture in hemodialysis patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lindberg JS, Moe SM (1999) Osteoporosis in end-state renal disease. Semin Nephrol 19(2):115–122

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Atsumi K, Kushida K, Yamazaki K, Shimizu S, Ohmura A, Inoue T (1999) Risk factors for vertebral fractures in renal osteodystrophy. Am J Kidney Dis 33(2):287–293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan YL, Furlong TJ, Cornish CJ, Posen S (1985) Dialysis osteodystrophy. A study involving 94 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 64(5):296–309

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schaab PC, Murphy G, Tzamaloukas AH, Hays MB, Merlin TL, Eisenberg B et al (1990) Femoral neck fractures in patients receiving long-term dialysis. Clin Orthop 260:224–231

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Malluche HH, Faugere MC (1989) Renal osteodystrophy. N Engl J Med 321:317–318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vonesh EF, Moran J (1999) Mortality in end-stage renal disease: a reassessment of differences between patients treated with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 10(2):354–365

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eknoyan G (1999) Cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in dialysis patients. Miner Electrolyte Metab 25(1–2):100–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sakhaee K, Gonzalez GB (1999) Update on renal osteodystrophy: pathogenesis and clinical management. Am J Med Sci 317(4):251–260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jamal S (2003) Fractures in men and women with dialysis-dependent renal failure. Endocrinology Rounds 3

  10. Jamal S, Chase C, Goh Y, Richardson R, Hawker G (2002) Bone density and heel ultrasound testing do not identify patients with dialysis-dependent renal failure who have had fractures. Am J Kidney Dis 39:843–849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alvarez-Ude F, Feest TG, Ward MK, Pierides AM, Ellis HA, Peart M et al (1978) Hemodialysis bone disease: correlation between clinical, histologic, and other findings. Kidney Int 14(1):68–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Boling EP, Primavera C, Friedman G, King M, Bosserman L, Schulz EE et al (1993) Non-invasive measurements of bone mass in adult renal osteodystrophy. Bone 14(3):409–413

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. DeVita MV, Rasenas LL, Bansal M, Gleim GW, Zabetakis PM, Gardenswartz MH et al (1992) Assessment of renal osteodystrophy in hemodialysis patients. Medicine 71(5):284–290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rubin LA, Hawker GA, Peltekova V, Fielding L, Ridout R, Cole DE (1999) Determinants of peak bone mass: clinical and genetic analyses in a young female Canadian cohort. J Bone Miner Res 14(4):633–643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jamal SA, Ridout R, Chase C, Fielding L, Rubin LA, Hawker GA (1999) Bone mineral density testing and osteoporosis education improve lifestyle behaviors in premenopausal women: a prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 14(12):2143–2149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Assessment of osteoporotic fracture risk and its role in screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. WHO Technical Series 1994; Geneva

  17. Black DM, Palermo L, Nevitt MC, Genant HK, Christensen L, Cummings SR (1999) Defining incident vertebral deformity: a prospective comparison of several approaches. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 14(1):90–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Looker AC, Orwoll ES, Johnston CCJ, Lindsay RL, Wahner HW, Dunn WL et al (1997) Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. adults from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 12:1769–1771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. DePaul V, Moreland J, Eager T, Clase CM (2002) The effectiveness of aerobic and muscle strength training in patients receiving hemodialysis and EPO: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis 40:1219–1229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Headley S, Germain M, Mailloux P, Mulhern J, Ashworth B, Burris J et al (2002) Resistance training improves strength and functional measures in patients with end-stage renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis 40:355–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Painter P, Carlson L, Carey S, Paul SM, Myll J (2000) Physical functioning and health-related quality-of-life changes with exercise training in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 35:482–492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Duruoz MT, Cerrahoglu L, Dincer-Turhan Y, Kursat S (2003) Hand function assessment in patients receiving haemodialysis. Swiss Med Wkly 133:433–438

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Albrand G, Munoz F, Sornay-Rendu E, DuBoeuf F, Delmas PD (2003) Independent predictors of all osteoporosis-related fractures in healthy postmenopausal women: the OFELY study. Bone 32:78–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cummings SR, Nevitt MC, Browner WS, Stone K, Fox KM, Ensrud KE et al (1995) Risk factors for hip fracture in white women. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. N Engl J Med 332(12):767–773

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hall SE, Williams JA, Senior JA, Goldswain PRJ, Criddle RA (2000) Hip fracture outcomes: quality of life and functional status in older adults living in the community. Aust N Z J Med 30:327–332

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nakashima A, Yorioka N, Doi S, Ueda C, Usui K, Shigemoto K et al (2003) Radial bone mineral density in hemodialysis patients with adynamic bone disease. Int J Artif Organs 26:200–204

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Elder G (2002) Pathophysiology and recent advances in the management of renal osteodystrophy. Bone Miner Res 17:2094–2105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gerakis A, Hadjidakis D, Kokkinakis E, Apostolou T, Raptis S, Billis A (2000) Correlation of bone mineral density with the histological findings of renal osteodystrophy in patients on hemodialysis. J Nephrol 13:437–443

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hercz G, Sherrard DJ, Chan W, Pei Y (1994) Aplastic osteodystrophy; follow-up after 5 years. J Am Soc Nephrol 5:851, (abstr)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jamal SA, Stone K, Browner WS, Ensrud KE, Cummings SR (1998) Serum fructosamine level and the risk of hip fracture in elderly women: a case-cohort study within the study of osteoporotic fractures. Am J Med 105(6):488–493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Chertow GM, Raggi P, Chasan-Taber S, Bommer J, Holzer H, Burke SK (2004) Determinants of progressive vascular calcification in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19:1489–1496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Chertow GM, Burke SK, Raggi P (2002) Sevelamer attenuates the progression of coronary and aortic calcification in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 62:245–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Vogt MT, San Valentin R, Forrest KY, Nevitt MC, Cauley JA (1997) Bone mineral density and aortic calcification: the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. J Am Geriatr Soc 45(2):140–145

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Schulz E, Arfai K, Liu X, Sayre J, Gilsanz V (2004) Aortic calcification and the risk of osteoporosis and fractures. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89(9):4243–4245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Burger H, de Laet CEDH, van Daele PLA, Weel AEAM, Witteman JCM, Hofman A et al (1998) Risk factors for increased bone loss in an elderly population. The Rotterdam Study. Am J Epidemiol 147:871–879

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee SH, Dargent-Molina P, Breart G, Group E (2002) Risk factors for fractures of the proximal humerus: results from the EPIDOS prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 17:817–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. MacInnis RJ, Cassar C, Nowson CA, Paton LM, Flicker L, Hopper JL et al (2003) Determinants of bone density in 30- to 65- year -old women: a co-twin study. J Bone Miner Res 18:1650–1656

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gregg EW, Cauley JA, Seeley DG, Ensrud KE, Bauer DC (1998) Physical activity and osteoporotic fracture risk in older women. Ann Intern Med 129:81–88

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Gregg EW, Pereira MA, Caspersen CJ (2000) Physical activity, falls, and fractures among older adults: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:883–893

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kurella M, Chertow GM, Luan J, Yaffe K (2004) Cognitive impairment in chronic kidney disease. J Am Geriatr Soc 52(11):1863–1869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Steffen TM, Hacker TA, Mollinger L (2002) Age- and gender- related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: six-minute walk test, Berg Balance Scale, timed up & go test, and gait speeds. Phys Ther 82:128–137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Calvo MS, Whiting SJ (2003) Prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in Canada and the United States: importance to health status and efficacy of current food fortification and dietary supplement use. Nutr Rev 61:107–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kudlacek S, Schneider B, Peterlik M, Leb G, Klaushofer K, Weber K et al (2003) Assessment of vitamin D and calcium status in healthy adult Austrians. Eur J Clin Invest 33:323–331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Jesudason D, Need AG, Horowitz M, O’Loughlin PD, Morris HA, Nordi BE (2002) Relationship between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and bone resorption markers in vitamin D insufficiency. Bone 31:626–630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Cunningham J, Sprague S (2004) Osteoporosis in chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 43:566–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Duncan PW, Weiner DK, Chandler J, Studenski S (1990) Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance. J Gerentol 45:M192–M197

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Schoppen T, Boonstra A, Groothoff JW, de Vries J, Goeken LN, Eisma WH (1999) The timed “up and go” test: reliability and validity in persons with unilateral lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80:825–828

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S (1985) Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 66:69–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Butland RJA, Pang J, Gross ER, Woodcock AA, Geddes DM (1982) Two, six, and twelve-minute walking test in respiratory disease. Br Med J 284:1607–1608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors have any conflict of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. A. Jamal.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Description of tests of neuromuscular function

Functional reach

For the functional reach test, participants were asked to stand upright close to a wall such that their shoulder was aligned with a 1-m rule secured to the wall. The participant was then asked to extend their arm, with the forearm pronated and the hand clenched in a fist. The position of the third metacarpal was measured on the meter rule (position 1). The participant was then asked to reach forward as far as they could in the horizontal plane without losing balance or taking a step. At this point, the position of the third metacarpal was again measured on the meter rule (position 2). The distance between position 1 and position 2 is considered the functional reach. Participants completed two practice trials and then three test trials. Functional reach, expressed in centimeters, was the average of the three test trials [46].

Timed up and go

The TUG test evaluates balance and basic functional mobility. The participant is seated in a standard arm chair (46-cm seat height to the ground), rises, walks 3 m at a comfortable pace, turns, walks back to the chair, and sits down. The time it takes to perform this task, measured with a standard stopwatch, is the TUG result [47].

Grip strength

We tested grip strength in the nonfistula hand using a Jamar dynamometer. Grip strength evaluated hand and forearm strength. Participants were seated comfortably in a chair, with the shoulder adducted and neutrally rotated, the elbow flexed at 90º, and the forearm and wrist in a neutral position. The participant was asked to squeeze the dynamometer bulb to maximal effort, and their grip strength was recorded. Each participant was given one practice session and three test trials with a minimum 5-s rest period between trials. The mean of the three trials was reported in kilograms [48].

The 6-min walk

The 6-min walk is used to evaluate exercise endurance. Participants are instructed to walk from end to end of a corridor, covering as much ground as possible in 6 min. Participants are told that they may rest if they become too short of breath or too tired to continue but to resume walking when they are able to do so. At the end of 6 min, the participants are told to stop. Distance walked and number and duration of rests are measured [49].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jamal, S.A., Leiter, R.E., Jassal, V. et al. Impaired muscle strength is associated with fractures in hemodialysis patients. Osteoporos Int 17, 1390–1397 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0133-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0133-y

Keywords

Navigation