Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Potential cost-effective use of spine radiographs to detect vertebral deformity and select osteopenic post-menopausal women for amino-bisphosphonate therapy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prevalent vertebral deformities are predictive of future clinical fractures independent of bone density. We used a Markov model with eight health states to estimate from the societal perspective the cost-effectiveness of using spine radiographs to identify postmenopausal women age 60 or older with one or more vertebral deformities and then treat them with anti-resorptive drug therapy to prevent fractures. We compared three strategies: 5 years of amino-bisphosphonate (alendronate) therapy for all, 5 years of alendronate therapy for only those with prevalent a radiographic vertebral deformity or no initial alendronate treatment. Lifetime direct medical and indirect costs, quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were tracked. For women with one or more prevalent vertebral deformities, the costs per QALY gained ranged from $5,084 (for an 80 year old with a T-score of −2.4) to $61,192 (for a 60 year old with a T-score of −1.0). For women without prevalent vertebral deformity, the costs per QALY gained ranged from $41,897 (for a 60 year old with a T-score of −2.4) to $166,219 (for an 80 year old with a T-score of −1.0). These results were modestly sensitive to reasonable changes in fracture rates, disutility, discount rates and assumptions about the accuracy of spinal radiographs for detecting vertebral deformity. Assuming a societal willingness to pay per QALY gained of $50,000, the strategy of performing spine radiographs in post-menopausal osteopenic women with T-scores at or below –1.5 and treating those with 1 or more prevalent vertebral deformities is likely to be cost-effective. However, further research on the accuracy of vertebral deformity ascertainment from routine clinical radiographs and on the efficacy of amino-bisphosphonate drugs for reducing the risk of non-vertebral fractures in osteopenic women is needed to define more precisely the subset of osteopenic post-menopausal women in whom use of spinal radiographs is most cost-effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Melton LJI (2003) Adverse outcomes of osteoporotic fractures in the general population. J Bone Miner Res 18:1139–1141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. National Osteoporosis Foundation (2005) Physician guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. http://www.nof.org/physguide/index.htm (accessed 15 January 2005)

  3. Hodgson SF, Watts NB, Force AT (2001) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists 2001 medical guidelines for clinical practice for the prevention and management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Pract :293–312

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown JP, Josse RG (2002) Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ 167 [Suppl 10]:S1–34

  5. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, et al (2004) Mortality after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 15:38–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Meunier PJ, Delmas PD, Eastell R, et al (1999) Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: clinical guidelines. International Committee for Osteoporosis Clinical Guidelines. Clin Ther 21:1025–1044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanis JA, Melton LJ III, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N (1994) The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 9:1137–1141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnell O, Jonsson B, Jonsson L, Black D (2003) Cost effectiveness of alendronate (fosamax) for the treatment of osteoporosis and prevention of fractures. Pharmacoeconomics 21:305–314

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Iglesias CP, Torgerson DJ, Bearne A, Bose U (2002) The cost utility of bisphosphonate treatment in established osteoporosis. QJM 95:305–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, Johnell O, Jonsson B (2004) Cost-effectiveness of risedronate for the treatment of osteoporosis and prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 15:862–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Siris ES, Chen YT, Abbott TA, et al (2004) Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures. Arch Intern Med 164:1108–1112

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wainwright SA, Phipps KR, Stone JV, et al (2001) A large proportion of fractures in postmenopausal women occur with baseline bone mineral density T-score >-2.5 (abstract). J Bone Miner Res 16 [Suppl 1]:S155

  13. Eddy DM, Johnston CC Jr, Cummings SR, et al (1998) Osteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment and cost-effectiveness analysis. Osteoporos Int 8 [Suppl 4]:S3–S88

  14. Black DM, Steinbuch M, Palermo L, et al (2001) An assessment tool for predicting fractures in post-menopausal women. Osteoporos Int 12:519–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Siris ES, Miller PD, Barrett-Connor E, et al (2001) Identification and fracture outcomes of undiagnosed low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment. JAMA 286:2815–2822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Black DM, Arden NK, Palermo L, Pearson J, Cummings SR (1999) Prevalent vertebral deformities predict hip fractures and new vertebral deformities but not wrist fractures. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 14:821–828

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ziegler R, Scheidt-Nave C, Leidig-Bruckner G (1996) What is a vertebral fracture? Bone 18 [Suppl 3]:169S–177S

  18. O’Neill TW, Silman AJ (1997) Definition and diagnosis of vertebral fracture. J Rheumatol 24:1208–1211

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Melton LJ III, Lane AW, Cooper C, Eastell R, O’Fallon WM, Riggs BL (1993) Prevalence and incidence of vertebral deformities. Osteoporos Int 3:113–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nevitt MC, Ettinger B, Black DM, et al (1998) The association of radiographically detected vertebral fractures with back pain and function: a prospective study. Ann Intern Med 128:793–800

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Melton LJ III, Crowson CS, O’Fallon WM (1999) Fracture incidence in Olmsted County, Minnesota: comparison of urban with rural rates and changes in urban rates over time. Osteoporos Int 9:29–37

    Google Scholar 

  22. Melton LJ III (1996) History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Mayo Clin Proc 71:266–274

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. De Laet CE, van Hout BA, Burger H, Hofman A, Pols HA (1997) Bone density and risk of hip fracture in men and women: cross sectional analysis. BMJ 315:221–225

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. De Laet CE, Van Hout BA, Burger H, Weel AE, Hofman A, Pols HA (1998) Hip fracture prediction in elderly men and women: validation in the Rotterdam study. J Bone Miner Res 13:1587–1593

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, et al (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 8:468–489

    Google Scholar 

  26. Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 312:1254–1259

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Melton LJ III, Ilstrup DM, Beckenbaugh RD, Riggs BL (1982) Hip fracture recurrence. A population-based study. Clin Orthop 167:131–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cuddihy MT, Gabriel SE, Crowson CS, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ III (1999) Forearm fractures as predictors of subsequent osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 9:469–475

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cranney A, Wells G, Willan A, et al (2002) Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. II. Meta-analysis of alendronate for the treatment of postmenopausal women. Endocr Rev 23:508–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tosteson AN, Jonsson B, Grima DT, O’Brien BJ, Black DM, Adachi JD (2001) Challenges for model-based economic evaluations of postmenopausal osteoporosis interventions. Osteoporos Int 12:849–857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. United States Life Tables 1999 (2002) National vital statistics report 50:17–18

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, De Laet C, Jonsson B, Oglesby AK (2003) The components of excess mortality after hip fracture. Bone 32:468–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, De Laet C, Jonsson B (2004) Excess mortality after hospitalisation for vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int15:108–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. (2001) Drug topics 2001 red book 2001. Medical Economics Co, Montvale, New Jersey

  35. Gabriel SE, Tosteson AN, Leibson CL, et al (2002) Direct medical costs attributable to osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 13:323–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (2003) http://cms.hhs.gov/providers/pufdownload/rvudown.asp (accessed 12 August 2003)

  37. Leibson CL, Tosteson AN, Gabriel SE, Ransom JE, Melton LJ (2002) Mortality, disability, and nursing home use for persons with and without hip fracture: a population-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc 50:1644–1650

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Agency for Health Care Research and Quality. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2003) http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/ (accessed 12 August 2003)

  39. Meerding WJ, Looman CW, Essink-Bot ML, Toet H, Mulder S, van Beeck EF (2004) Distribution and determinants of health and work status in a comprehensive population of injury patients. J Trauma 56:150–161

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Census Bureau (2002) CPS annual demographic survey. http://ferret.bls.census.gov/macro/032002/perinc/new05_000.htm (accessed 28 May 2004)

  41. US Census Bureau. Workforce participation rates. http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_lang=en (accessed 28 May 2004)

  42. Oleksik A, Lips P, Dawson A, et al (2000) Health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women with low BMD with or without prevalent vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 15:1384–1392

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Huang C, Ross PD, Wasnich RD (1996) Vertebral fracture and other predictors of physical impairment and health care utilization. Arch Intern Med 156:2469–2475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Huang C, Ross PD, Wasnich RD (1996) Vertebral fractures and other predictors of back pain among older women. J Bone Miner Res 11:1026–1032

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Tosteson AN, Gabriel SE, Grove MR, Moncur MM, Kneeland TS, Melton LJ III (2001) Impact of hip and vertebral fractures on quality-adjusted life years. Osteoporos Int 12:1042–1049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Melton LJ, Chrischilles EA, Cooper C, Lane AW, Riggs BL (1992) Perspective: how many women have osteoporosis? J Bone Miner Res 7:1005–1010

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Raftery J (2001) NICE: faster access to modern treatments? Analysis of guidance on health technologies. BMJ 323:1300–1303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. George B, Harris A, Mitchell A (2001) Cost-effectiveness analysis and the consistency of decision making: evidence from pharmaceutical reimbursement in Australia (1991 to 1996). Pharmacoeconomic 19:1103–1109

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ross PD, Davis JW, Epstein RS, Wasnich RD (1991) Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women. Ann Intern Med 114:919–923

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Abdel-Hamid Osman A, Bassiouni H, Koutri R, Nijs J, Geusens P, Dequeker J (1994) Aging of the thoracic spine: distinction between wedging in osteoarthritis and fracture in osteoporosis—a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Bone 15:437–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hirth R, Chernow M, Miller E, Fendrick A, Weissert W (2000) Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: in search of a standard. Med Decis Making 20:332–342

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ubel PA, Hirth RA, Chernew ME, Fendrick AM (2003) What is the price of life and why doesn’t it increase at the rate of inflation? Arch Intern Med 163:1637–1641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Black DM, Palermo L, Nevitt MC, et al (1995) Comparison of methods for defining prevalent vertebral deformities: the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. J Bone Miner Res 10:890–902

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ross PD, Genant HK, Davis JW, Miller PD, Wasnich RD (1993) Predicting vertebral fracture incidence from prevalent fractures and bone density among non-black, osteoporotic women. Osteoporos Int 3:120–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Fechtenbaum J, Bugnard F, Kolta S, et al (2004) Vertebral fracture: a difficult diagnosis? The Act’os study (abstract). J Bone Miner Res 19 [Suppl 1]:S233

  56. Greenspan S, von Stetten E, Emond S, Jones L, Parker R (2001) Instant vertebral assessment. J Clin Densitometry 4:373–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Schousboe J, DeBold C, Bowles C, Glickstein S, Rubino R (2002) Prevalence of vertebral compression fracture deformity by X-ray absorptiometry of lateral thoracic and lumbar spines in a population referred for bone densitometry. J Clin Densitometry 5:239–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Rea JA, Chen MB, Li J et al (2000) Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry and morphometric radiography of the spine: a comparison of prevalent vertebral deformity identification. J Bone Miner Res 15:564–574

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ismail AA, Cockerill W, Cooper C, et al (2001) Prevalent vertebral deformity predicts incident hip though not distal forearm fracture: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int 12:85–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Rosner AJ, Grima DT, Torrance GW, et al (1998) Cost effectiveness of multi-therapy treatment strategies in the prevention of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Pharmacoeconomics 14:559–573

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Le Pen C, Maurel F, Breart G, et al (2000) The long-term effectiveness of preventive strategies for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: A modeling approach. Osteoporos Int 11:524–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al (1993) Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Lancet 341:72–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Jones G, White C, Nguyen T, Sambrook PN, Kelly PJ, Eisman JA (1996) Prevalent vertebral deformities: relationship to bone mineral density and spinal osteophytosis in elderly men and women. Osteoporos Int 6:233–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Leidig-Bruckner G, Limberg B, Felsenberg D, et al (2000) Sex difference in the validity of vertebral deformities as an index of prevalent vertebral osteoporotic fractures: a population survey of older men and women. Osteoporos Int 11:102–119

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Burstrom K, Johannesson M, Diderichsen F (2001) Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res 10:621–635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C, Williams A (1998) Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. BMJ 316:736–741

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dr. Schousboe received research grant support from Hologic, Inc., and Dr. Ensrud received research grant support from Pfizer, Inc., and from Eli Lilly and Co.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John T. Schousboe.

Appendix

Appendix

Derivation of age- and BMD-specific fracture risk equations

Adjustment of the age-specific fracture risk functions for BMD, which apply to a population with a mean Z-score of 0, were done in the following manner[23, 24]. Because the relationship between bone mineral density and incident fractures is exponential, to estimate the risk for a specific fracture for individuals with a Z-score equal to a specific value, the risk equation needs to be divided by a correction factor:

$$ {\text{C = }}{\int {\text{1}} }{\text{/}}{\left( {{\sqrt {{\text{2}}\Pi } }} \right)} * {\left( {{\text{e $ \hat{} $ }} - {\text{0}}{\text{.5z}}^{{\text{2}}} } \right)} * {\left( {{\text{a $ \hat{} $ }} - {\text{z}}} \right)} * {\text{dz}}{\text{,}} $$
(1)

where z is the actual Z-score and a is the relative risk of that fracture for each Z-score change of 1. For example, assuming a relative risk of 2.6 for incident hip fracture per Z-score change [62], this correction factor equals 1.57854 for an individual with a Z-score equal to 0.

The Z-score at any age stage of the model was derived from the starting T-score by the following equations. Mean BMD (Z-score =0) for any age was estimated from the regression line of mean bone density (in gm/cm2) as a function of ages 50 to 90 [25],

$$ {\text{Mean BMD for Age}} = {\text{1}}{\text{.075}} - {\left( {{\text{0}}{\text{.00554*Age}}} \right)}{\text{ gm/cm}}^{{\text{2}}} {\text{.}} $$
(2)

The starting T-score was converted to absolute gm/cm2 by the equation:

$$ {\text{Starting BMD}}{\left( {{\text{gm/cm}}^{{\text{2}}} } \right)} = {\text{0}}{\text{.858}} + {\left( {{\text{Starting T - score}}} \right)} * {\text{0}}{\text{.12}}{\text{,}} $$
(3)

and therefore BMD at any given age is:

$$ \begin{aligned} & {\text{Current BMD}} = {\left[ {{\text{0}}{\text{.858}} + {\left( {{\text{Starting T - score}}} \right)} * {\text{0}}{\text{.12}}} \right]} - {\text{0}}{\text{.00554}} * {\text{Age}}{\text{, and}} \\ & {\text{Current Z - score}} = {\left[ {{\left( {{\text{Current BMD}}} \right)} - {\left( {{\text{Mean BMD for age}}} \right)}} \right]}{\text{ / 0}}{\text{.114}}{\text{,}} \\ \end{aligned} $$
(4)

where 0.114 equals the pooled standard deviation of femoral neck BMD for Caucasian women aged 50 to 90 [25].

Estimation of radiographic vertebral deformity prevalence for combinations of age and BMD

For each starting age, the prevalence (Prevage) of radiographic vertebral deformity was estimated from the population-based study of Melton and colleagues [19], which apply to age-specific groups of women with a mean Z-score equal to zero. We estimated the odds ratio of one or more prevalent vertebral deformities for each Z-score change of 1 to be 1.5 [53, 63, 64].

Therefore, for women with a Z-score equal to zero,

$$ {\text{Prev}}_{{{\text{Z}} = {\text{0}}}} = {\text{Prev}}_{{{\text{age}}}} {\text{/}}{\int {\text{1}} }{\text{/}}{\left( {{\sqrt {{\text{2}}\Pi } }} \right)} * {\left( {{\text{e $ \hat{} $ }} - {\text{0}}{\text{.5z}}^{{\text{2}}} } \right)} * {\left( {{\text{1}}{\text{.5 $ \hat{} $ }} - {\text{z}}} \right)} * {\text{dz}} = {\text{Prev}}_{{{\text{age}}}} {\text{/1}}{\text{.0857}} $$
(5)

Therefore, for any Z-score,

$$ {\left[ {{\text{Prev}}_{{{\text{Age}}{\text{,Z}}}} {\text{/}}{\left( {{\text{1 - Prev}}_{{{\text{Age}}{\text{,Z}}}} } \right)}} \right]}{\text{/}}{\left[ {{\text{Prev}}_{{{\text{Z}} = {\text{0}}}} {\text{/}}{\left( {{\text{1 - Prev}}_{{{\text{Z}} = {\text{0}}}} } \right)}} \right]} = {\text{1}}{\text{.5}}^{{ - {\text{Z}}}} {\text{,}} $$
(6)

with starting Z-score = [(starting BMD) – (1.0375 – 0.00554*Age)]/0.114.

The prevalence of one or more radiographic vertebral deformities for any combination of starting age and T-score is therefore given by solving equations 5 and 6 for PrevAge,Z.

However, we estimated that 30% of these vertebral deformities represented clinical vertebral fractures, discovered at the time of their occurrence. Therefore, the final prevalence of clinically unapparent radiographic vertebral deformities (Prevfinal) for any starting age and Z-score (Table 1) is:

$$ {\text{Prev}}_{{{\text{final}}}} = {\left( {{\text{Prev}}_{{{\text{Age}}{\text{,Z}}}} - {\text{ 0}}{\text{.3}} * {\text{Prev}}_{{{\text{Age}}{\text{,Z}}}} } \right)}{\text{/}}{\left( {{\text{1}} - {\text{0}}{\text{.3}} * {\text{Prev}}_{{{\text{Age}}{\text{,Z}}}} } \right)}. $$
(7)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schousboe, J.T., Ensrud, K.E., Nyman, J.A. et al. Potential cost-effective use of spine radiographs to detect vertebral deformity and select osteopenic post-menopausal women for amino-bisphosphonate therapy. Osteoporos Int 16, 1883–1893 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1956-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1956-7

Keywords

Navigation