Abstract
Prevalent vertebral deformities are predictive of future clinical fractures independent of bone density. We used a Markov model with eight health states to estimate from the societal perspective the cost-effectiveness of using spine radiographs to identify postmenopausal women age 60 or older with one or more vertebral deformities and then treat them with anti-resorptive drug therapy to prevent fractures. We compared three strategies: 5 years of amino-bisphosphonate (alendronate) therapy for all, 5 years of alendronate therapy for only those with prevalent a radiographic vertebral deformity or no initial alendronate treatment. Lifetime direct medical and indirect costs, quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were tracked. For women with one or more prevalent vertebral deformities, the costs per QALY gained ranged from $5,084 (for an 80 year old with a T-score of −2.4) to $61,192 (for a 60 year old with a T-score of −1.0). For women without prevalent vertebral deformity, the costs per QALY gained ranged from $41,897 (for a 60 year old with a T-score of −2.4) to $166,219 (for an 80 year old with a T-score of −1.0). These results were modestly sensitive to reasonable changes in fracture rates, disutility, discount rates and assumptions about the accuracy of spinal radiographs for detecting vertebral deformity. Assuming a societal willingness to pay per QALY gained of $50,000, the strategy of performing spine radiographs in post-menopausal osteopenic women with T-scores at or below –1.5 and treating those with 1 or more prevalent vertebral deformities is likely to be cost-effective. However, further research on the accuracy of vertebral deformity ascertainment from routine clinical radiographs and on the efficacy of amino-bisphosphonate drugs for reducing the risk of non-vertebral fractures in osteopenic women is needed to define more precisely the subset of osteopenic post-menopausal women in whom use of spinal radiographs is most cost-effective.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Melton LJI (2003) Adverse outcomes of osteoporotic fractures in the general population. J Bone Miner Res 18:1139–1141
National Osteoporosis Foundation (2005) Physician guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. http://www.nof.org/physguide/index.htm (accessed 15 January 2005)
Hodgson SF, Watts NB, Force AT (2001) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists 2001 medical guidelines for clinical practice for the prevention and management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Pract :293–312
Brown JP, Josse RG (2002) Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ 167 [Suppl 10]:S1–34
Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, et al (2004) Mortality after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 15:38–42
Meunier PJ, Delmas PD, Eastell R, et al (1999) Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: clinical guidelines. International Committee for Osteoporosis Clinical Guidelines. Clin Ther 21:1025–1044
Kanis JA, Melton LJ III, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N (1994) The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 9:1137–1141
Johnell O, Jonsson B, Jonsson L, Black D (2003) Cost effectiveness of alendronate (fosamax) for the treatment of osteoporosis and prevention of fractures. Pharmacoeconomics 21:305–314
Iglesias CP, Torgerson DJ, Bearne A, Bose U (2002) The cost utility of bisphosphonate treatment in established osteoporosis. QJM 95:305–311
Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, Johnell O, Jonsson B (2004) Cost-effectiveness of risedronate for the treatment of osteoporosis and prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 15:862–871
Siris ES, Chen YT, Abbott TA, et al (2004) Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures. Arch Intern Med 164:1108–1112
Wainwright SA, Phipps KR, Stone JV, et al (2001) A large proportion of fractures in postmenopausal women occur with baseline bone mineral density T-score >-2.5 (abstract). J Bone Miner Res 16 [Suppl 1]:S155
Eddy DM, Johnston CC Jr, Cummings SR, et al (1998) Osteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment and cost-effectiveness analysis. Osteoporos Int 8 [Suppl 4]:S3–S88
Black DM, Steinbuch M, Palermo L, et al (2001) An assessment tool for predicting fractures in post-menopausal women. Osteoporos Int 12:519–528
Siris ES, Miller PD, Barrett-Connor E, et al (2001) Identification and fracture outcomes of undiagnosed low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment. JAMA 286:2815–2822
Black DM, Arden NK, Palermo L, Pearson J, Cummings SR (1999) Prevalent vertebral deformities predict hip fractures and new vertebral deformities but not wrist fractures. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 14:821–828
Ziegler R, Scheidt-Nave C, Leidig-Bruckner G (1996) What is a vertebral fracture? Bone 18 [Suppl 3]:169S–177S
O’Neill TW, Silman AJ (1997) Definition and diagnosis of vertebral fracture. J Rheumatol 24:1208–1211
Melton LJ III, Lane AW, Cooper C, Eastell R, O’Fallon WM, Riggs BL (1993) Prevalence and incidence of vertebral deformities. Osteoporos Int 3:113–119
Nevitt MC, Ettinger B, Black DM, et al (1998) The association of radiographically detected vertebral fractures with back pain and function: a prospective study. Ann Intern Med 128:793–800
Melton LJ III, Crowson CS, O’Fallon WM (1999) Fracture incidence in Olmsted County, Minnesota: comparison of urban with rural rates and changes in urban rates over time. Osteoporos Int 9:29–37
Melton LJ III (1996) History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Mayo Clin Proc 71:266–274
De Laet CE, van Hout BA, Burger H, Hofman A, Pols HA (1997) Bone density and risk of hip fracture in men and women: cross sectional analysis. BMJ 315:221–225
De Laet CE, Van Hout BA, Burger H, Weel AE, Hofman A, Pols HA (1998) Hip fracture prediction in elderly men and women: validation in the Rotterdam study. J Bone Miner Res 13:1587–1593
Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, et al (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 8:468–489
Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 312:1254–1259
Melton LJ III, Ilstrup DM, Beckenbaugh RD, Riggs BL (1982) Hip fracture recurrence. A population-based study. Clin Orthop 167:131–138
Cuddihy MT, Gabriel SE, Crowson CS, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ III (1999) Forearm fractures as predictors of subsequent osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 9:469–475
Cranney A, Wells G, Willan A, et al (2002) Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. II. Meta-analysis of alendronate for the treatment of postmenopausal women. Endocr Rev 23:508–516
Tosteson AN, Jonsson B, Grima DT, O’Brien BJ, Black DM, Adachi JD (2001) Challenges for model-based economic evaluations of postmenopausal osteoporosis interventions. Osteoporos Int 12:849–857
United States Life Tables 1999 (2002) National vital statistics report 50:17–18
Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, De Laet C, Jonsson B, Oglesby AK (2003) The components of excess mortality after hip fracture. Bone 32:468–473
Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, De Laet C, Jonsson B (2004) Excess mortality after hospitalisation for vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int15:108–112
(2001) Drug topics 2001 red book 2001. Medical Economics Co, Montvale, New Jersey
Gabriel SE, Tosteson AN, Leibson CL, et al (2002) Direct medical costs attributable to osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 13:323–330
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (2003) http://cms.hhs.gov/providers/pufdownload/rvudown.asp (accessed 12 August 2003)
Leibson CL, Tosteson AN, Gabriel SE, Ransom JE, Melton LJ (2002) Mortality, disability, and nursing home use for persons with and without hip fracture: a population-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc 50:1644–1650
Agency for Health Care Research and Quality. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2003) http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/ (accessed 12 August 2003)
Meerding WJ, Looman CW, Essink-Bot ML, Toet H, Mulder S, van Beeck EF (2004) Distribution and determinants of health and work status in a comprehensive population of injury patients. J Trauma 56:150–161
Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Census Bureau (2002) CPS annual demographic survey. http://ferret.bls.census.gov/macro/032002/perinc/new05_000.htm (accessed 28 May 2004)
US Census Bureau. Workforce participation rates. http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_lang=en (accessed 28 May 2004)
Oleksik A, Lips P, Dawson A, et al (2000) Health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women with low BMD with or without prevalent vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 15:1384–1392
Huang C, Ross PD, Wasnich RD (1996) Vertebral fracture and other predictors of physical impairment and health care utilization. Arch Intern Med 156:2469–2475
Huang C, Ross PD, Wasnich RD (1996) Vertebral fractures and other predictors of back pain among older women. J Bone Miner Res 11:1026–1032
Tosteson AN, Gabriel SE, Grove MR, Moncur MM, Kneeland TS, Melton LJ III (2001) Impact of hip and vertebral fractures on quality-adjusted life years. Osteoporos Int 12:1042–1049
Melton LJ, Chrischilles EA, Cooper C, Lane AW, Riggs BL (1992) Perspective: how many women have osteoporosis? J Bone Miner Res 7:1005–1010
Raftery J (2001) NICE: faster access to modern treatments? Analysis of guidance on health technologies. BMJ 323:1300–1303
George B, Harris A, Mitchell A (2001) Cost-effectiveness analysis and the consistency of decision making: evidence from pharmaceutical reimbursement in Australia (1991 to 1996). Pharmacoeconomic 19:1103–1109
Ross PD, Davis JW, Epstein RS, Wasnich RD (1991) Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women. Ann Intern Med 114:919–923
Abdel-Hamid Osman A, Bassiouni H, Koutri R, Nijs J, Geusens P, Dequeker J (1994) Aging of the thoracic spine: distinction between wedging in osteoarthritis and fracture in osteoporosis—a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Bone 15:437–442
Hirth R, Chernow M, Miller E, Fendrick A, Weissert W (2000) Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: in search of a standard. Med Decis Making 20:332–342
Ubel PA, Hirth RA, Chernew ME, Fendrick AM (2003) What is the price of life and why doesn’t it increase at the rate of inflation? Arch Intern Med 163:1637–1641
Black DM, Palermo L, Nevitt MC, et al (1995) Comparison of methods for defining prevalent vertebral deformities: the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. J Bone Miner Res 10:890–902
Ross PD, Genant HK, Davis JW, Miller PD, Wasnich RD (1993) Predicting vertebral fracture incidence from prevalent fractures and bone density among non-black, osteoporotic women. Osteoporos Int 3:120–126
Fechtenbaum J, Bugnard F, Kolta S, et al (2004) Vertebral fracture: a difficult diagnosis? The Act’os study (abstract). J Bone Miner Res 19 [Suppl 1]:S233
Greenspan S, von Stetten E, Emond S, Jones L, Parker R (2001) Instant vertebral assessment. J Clin Densitometry 4:373–380
Schousboe J, DeBold C, Bowles C, Glickstein S, Rubino R (2002) Prevalence of vertebral compression fracture deformity by X-ray absorptiometry of lateral thoracic and lumbar spines in a population referred for bone densitometry. J Clin Densitometry 5:239–246
Rea JA, Chen MB, Li J et al (2000) Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry and morphometric radiography of the spine: a comparison of prevalent vertebral deformity identification. J Bone Miner Res 15:564–574
Ismail AA, Cockerill W, Cooper C, et al (2001) Prevalent vertebral deformity predicts incident hip though not distal forearm fracture: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int 12:85–90
Rosner AJ, Grima DT, Torrance GW, et al (1998) Cost effectiveness of multi-therapy treatment strategies in the prevention of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Pharmacoeconomics 14:559–573
Le Pen C, Maurel F, Breart G, et al (2000) The long-term effectiveness of preventive strategies for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: A modeling approach. Osteoporos Int 11:524–532
Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al (1993) Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Lancet 341:72–75
Jones G, White C, Nguyen T, Sambrook PN, Kelly PJ, Eisman JA (1996) Prevalent vertebral deformities: relationship to bone mineral density and spinal osteophytosis in elderly men and women. Osteoporos Int 6:233–239
Leidig-Bruckner G, Limberg B, Felsenberg D, et al (2000) Sex difference in the validity of vertebral deformities as an index of prevalent vertebral osteoporotic fractures: a population survey of older men and women. Osteoporos Int 11:102–119
Burstrom K, Johannesson M, Diderichsen F (2001) Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res 10:621–635
Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C, Williams A (1998) Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. BMJ 316:736–741
Acknowledgements
Dr. Schousboe received research grant support from Hologic, Inc., and Dr. Ensrud received research grant support from Pfizer, Inc., and from Eli Lilly and Co.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Derivation of age- and BMD-specific fracture risk equations
Adjustment of the age-specific fracture risk functions for BMD, which apply to a population with a mean Z-score of 0, were done in the following manner[23, 24]. Because the relationship between bone mineral density and incident fractures is exponential, to estimate the risk for a specific fracture for individuals with a Z-score equal to a specific value, the risk equation needs to be divided by a correction factor:
where z is the actual Z-score and a is the relative risk of that fracture for each Z-score change of 1. For example, assuming a relative risk of 2.6 for incident hip fracture per Z-score change [62], this correction factor equals 1.57854 for an individual with a Z-score equal to 0.
The Z-score at any age stage of the model was derived from the starting T-score by the following equations. Mean BMD (Z-score =0) for any age was estimated from the regression line of mean bone density (in gm/cm2) as a function of ages 50 to 90 [25],
The starting T-score was converted to absolute gm/cm2 by the equation:
and therefore BMD at any given age is:
where 0.114 equals the pooled standard deviation of femoral neck BMD for Caucasian women aged 50 to 90 [25].
Estimation of radiographic vertebral deformity prevalence for combinations of age and BMD
For each starting age, the prevalence (Prevage) of radiographic vertebral deformity was estimated from the population-based study of Melton and colleagues [19], which apply to age-specific groups of women with a mean Z-score equal to zero. We estimated the odds ratio of one or more prevalent vertebral deformities for each Z-score change of 1 to be 1.5 [53, 63, 64].
Therefore, for women with a Z-score equal to zero,
Therefore, for any Z-score,
with starting Z-score = [(starting BMD) – (1.0375 – 0.00554*Age)]/0.114.
The prevalence of one or more radiographic vertebral deformities for any combination of starting age and T-score is therefore given by solving equations 5 and 6 for PrevAge,Z.
However, we estimated that 30% of these vertebral deformities represented clinical vertebral fractures, discovered at the time of their occurrence. Therefore, the final prevalence of clinically unapparent radiographic vertebral deformities (Prevfinal) for any starting age and Z-score (Table 1) is:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schousboe, J.T., Ensrud, K.E., Nyman, J.A. et al. Potential cost-effective use of spine radiographs to detect vertebral deformity and select osteopenic post-menopausal women for amino-bisphosphonate therapy. Osteoporos Int 16, 1883–1893 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1956-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1956-7