Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

BsmI vitamin D receptor genotypes influence the efficacy of antiresorptive treatments in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. A 1-year multicenter, randomized and controlled trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms could be considered one of the factors influencing the efficacy of the anti-osteoporotic treatments. In this multicenter, prospective, randomized and controlled trial we evaluated whether BsmI vitamin D receptor (VDR) genotypes influence the efficacy of antiresorptive treatment regimes (administered alone or in combination) in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. Using restriction endonuclease, we identified the BsmI VDR polymorphism in 1,100 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The women were randomized, taking account of genotype, into five treatment groups: (1) alendronate (Aln, 10 mg/day) plus raloxifene (Rlx, 60 mg/day); (2) Aln plus hormone replacement therapy (HRT, 0.625 mg/day conjugated equine estrogens plus 2.5 mg/day medroxyprogesterone acetate); (3) Aln alone; (4) HRT alone; and (5) Rlx alone. Lumbar-spine bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers were measured at study entry and after 1 year of treatment. Using the general linear model (GLM) repeated-measures procedure, the means of BMD and bone turnover markers significantly differed from baseline after a period of treatment. In particular, the mean change from baseline for BMD was −0.034 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.037 to −0.031, P <0.001); for serum osteocalcin (OC) it was 1.369 (95% CI: 1.289 to 1.448, P <0.001); and for urinary deoxypyridinoline (DPD) it was 1.322 (95% CI: 1.242 to 1.401, P <0.001), indicating a considerable variation before and after treatment of these indicators. In all three cases these effects appeared significantly influenced by treatments, genotypes, and the treatments*genotypes interaction term (P <0.001 each, except for the BMD and genotype effect with P =0.02), and not by the investigational centers involved in the study. In conclusion, in postmenopausal osteoporotic women, BsmI VDR genotypes influence the efficacy of antiresorptive drugs particularly when used in combination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sharpe M, Noble S, Spencer MC (2001) Alendronate. An update of its use in osteoporosis. Drugs 61:999–1039

    Google Scholar 

  2. Delmas PD (2002) Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Lancet 359:2018–2026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Delmas PD, Ensrud KE, Adachi JD, Harper KD, Sarkar S, Gennari C, Reginster JY, Pols HAP, Recker RR, Harris ST, Wu W, Genant HK, Black MD, Eastell R (2002) Efficacy of Raloxifene on vertebral fracture risk reduction in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: Four-year results from randomized clinical trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:3609–3617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Writing Group for the Women’s Health Initiative Investigators (2002) Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestins in healthy postmenopausal women. Principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 17:321–333

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marcus R, Wong M, Heath H 3rd, Stock JL (2002) Antiresorptive treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: Comparison of study designs and outcomes in large clinical trials with fracture as an endpoint. Endocr Rev 23:16–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ettinger B, Bilezikian JP (2002) For osteoporosis, are two antiresorptive drugs better than one? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:983–984

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lindsay R, Cosman F, Lobo RA, Walsh BW, Harris ST, Reagan JE, Liss CL, Melton ME, Byrnes CA (1999) Addition of alendronate to ongoing hormone replacement therapy in the treatment of osteoporosis: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:3076–3081

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bone HG, Greenspan SL, McKeever C, Bell N, Davidson M, Downs RW, Emkey R, Meunier PJ, Miller SS, Mulloy AL, Recker RR, Stuart RW, Heyden N, Musliner T, Suryawanshi S, Yates AJ, Lombardi A (2000) Alendronate and estrogen effects in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:720–726

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tiras MB, Noyan V, Yildiz A, Yildirim M, Daya S (2000) Effects of alendronate and hormone replacement therapy, alone or in combination, on bone mass in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a prospective, randomized study. Hum Reprod 15:2087–2092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Palomba S, Orio F Jr, Di Carlo C, Colao A, Lombardi G, Zullo F, Mastrantonio P (2002) Effect of estrogen replacement plus low-dose alendronate treatment on bone density in surgically postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:1502–1058

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnell O, Scheele WH, Yili L, Reginster JY, Need AG, Seeman E (2002) Additive effects of raloxifene and alendronate on bone density and biochemical markers of bone remodeling in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:985–992

    Google Scholar 

  12. Greenspan SL, Resnik NM, Parker RA (2003) Combination therapy with hormone replacement and alendronate for prevention of bone loss in elderly women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 289:2525–2533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cummings SR, Palermo L, Browner W, Marcus R, Wallace R, Pearson J, Blackwell T, Eckert S, Black D (2000) Monitoring osteoporosis therapy with bone densitometry: misleading changes and regression to the mean. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. JAMA 283:1318–1322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eisman JA (1999) Genetics of osteoporosis. Endocr Rev 20:788–804

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eisman JA (2001) Pharmacogenetics of the vitamin D receptor and osteoporosis. Drug Metab Dispos 9:505–512

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ferrari S, Rizzoli R, Chavalley T, Slosman D, Eisman JA, Bonjour JP (1995) Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism and rate of change in lumbar spine bone mineral density in elderly men and women. Lancet 10:423–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dawson-Hughes B, Harris SS, Finneran S (1995) Calcium absorption on high and low calcium intakes in relation to vitamin D receptor genotype. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:3657–3661

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kiel DP, Myers RH, Cupples LA, Kong XF, Zhu XH, Ordovas J, Schaefer EJ, Felson DT, Rush D, Wilson PW (1997) The BsmI vitamin D receptor restriction fragment length polymorphism (bb) influences the effect of calcium intake on bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res 12:1049–1057

    Google Scholar 

  19. Howard G, Nguyen T, Morrison N, Watanabe T, Sambrook P, Eisman J, Kelly PJ (1995) Genetic influence on bone density: physiological correlates of vitamin D receptor gene alleles in premenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:2800–2805

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wishart JM, Horowitz M, Need AG, Scopacasa F, Morris HA, Clifton PM, Nordin BE (1997) Relations between calcium intake, calcitriol, polymorphism of the vitamin D receptor gene and calcium adsorption in premenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr 65:798–802

    Google Scholar 

  21. Graafmans WC, Lips P, Ooms ME, van Leeuwen JP, Pols HA, Uitterlinden AG (1997) The effect of vitamin D supplementation on the bone mineral density of the femoral neck is associated with vitamin D receptor genotype. J Bone Miner Res 12:1241–1245

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fleisch H (1998) Bisphosphonates: Mechanisms of action. Endocr Rev 19:80–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rogers MJ, Gordon S, Benford HL, Coxon FP, Luckman SP, Monkkonen J, Frith JC (2000) Cellular and molecular mechanism of action of bisphosphonates. Cancer 88 [Suppl 12]:2961–2978

  24. Byrne IM, Flanagan L, Tenniswood MP, Welsh J (2000) Identification of a hormone-responsive promoter immediately upstream of exon 1c in the human vitamin D receptor gene. Endocrinology 141:2829–2836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ishibe M, Nojima T, Ishibashi T, Koda T, Kaneda K, Rosier RN, Puzas JE (1995) 17 beta-estradiol increases the receptor number and modulates the action of 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in human osteosarcoma-derived osteoblast-like cells. Calcif Tissue Int 57:430–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liel Y, Kraus S, Levy J, Shany S (1992) Evidence that estrogens modulate activity and increase the number of 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D receptors in osteoblast-like cells (ROS 17/2.8). Endocrinology 130:2597–2601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Marc J, Prezelj J, Komel R, Kocijancic A (1999) VDR genotype and response to etidronate therapy in late postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 10:303–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Palomba S, Numis FG, Mossetti G, Rendina D, VuottoP, Russo T, Zullo F, NappiC, Nunziata V (2003) Effectiveness of alendronate treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: relationship with BsmI vitamin D receptor genotypes. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1:22–29

    Google Scholar 

  29. Deng HW, Li J, Li JL, Johnson M, Gong G, Davis KM, Recker RR (1998) Change of bone mass in postmenopausal Caucasian women with and without hormone replacement therapy is associated with vitamin D receptor and estrogen receptor genotypes. Hum Genet 103:576–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kurabayashi T, Tomita M, Matsushita H, Yahata T, Honda A, Takakuwa K, Tanaka K (1999) Association of vitamin D and estrogen receptor gene polymorphism with the effect of hormone replacement therapy on bone mineral density in Japanese women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:1115–1120

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tofteng CL, Jensen JE, Abrahamsen B, Odum L, Brot C (2002) Two polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor gene—association with bone mass and 5-year change in bone mass with or without hormone-replacement therapy in postmenopausal women: the Danish Osteoporosis Prevention Study. J Bone Miner Res 17:535–544

    Google Scholar 

  32. Palomba S, Numis FG, Mossetti G, Rendina D, VuottoP, Russo T, Zullo F, NappiC, Nunziata V (2003) Raloxifene administration in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: effect of different BsmI vitamin D receptor genotypes. Hum Reprod 1:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rand TH, Seidl G, Kainberger F, Resch A, Hittmair K, Schneider B, Gluer CC, Imhof H (1997) Impact of spinal degenerative changes on the evaluation of bone mineral density with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Calcif Tissue Int 60:430–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Orwell ES, Oviatt KS, Mann T (1990) The impact of osteophytic and vascular calcification on vertebral mineral density measurement in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70:1202–1207

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Masud T, Keen R, Nandra D, Jawed S, Doyle DV, Spector TD (1996) Facet joint osteoarthritis and bone density measurements. In: Papapoulos SE, Lips P, Pols HAP, Johnston CC, Delmas PD (eds) Osteoporosis. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 167–170

  36. Kiel D (1995) Assessing vertebral fractures. National Osteoporosis Foundation Working Group on Vertebral Fractures. J Bone Miner Res 10:518–523

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sainz J, Van Tornout JM, Loro ML, Sayre J, Roe TF, Gilsanz V (1997) Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and bone density in prepubertal American girls of Mexican descent. N Engl J Med 337:77–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Morrison NA, Qi JC, Tokita A, Kelly PJ, Crofts L, Nguyen TV, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA (1994) Prediction of bone density from Vitamin D receptor alleles. Nature 367:284–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gennari L, Becherini L, Masi L, Mansani R, Gonnelli S, Cepollaro C, Martini S, Montagnani A, Lentini G, Becorpi AM, Brandi ML (1998) Vitamin D end estrogen receptor allelic variants in Italian postmenopausal women: evidence of multiple gene contribution to bone mineral density. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:939–944

    Google Scholar 

  40. GLM repeated measures (2003) In: SPSS Advanced Models 12.0. SPSS, Chicago, Chapter 2, pp 17–34

  41. Egger M, Juni P, Bartlett C; CONSORT Group (Consolidated Standards of Reporting of Trials) (2001) Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials. JAMA 285:1996–1999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Cummings SR, Karpf DB, Harris F, Genant HK, Ensrud K, LaCroix AZ, Black DM (2002) Improvement in spine bone density and reduction in risk of vertebral fractures during treatment with antiresorptive drugs. Am J Med 112:281–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sarkar S, Mitlak BH, Wong M, Stock JL, Black DM, Harper KD (2002) Relationships between bone mineral density and incident vertebral fracture risk with raloxifene therapy. J Bone Miner Res 17:1–10

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the “Programma Operativo Plurifondo (POP)”, Campania Region, Italy. The authors thank Dr. Benito Chinea (Ibis, Milan) and Mrs. Jean Ann Gilder (Scientific Communication) for editing the text. No financial support was provided by any pharmaceutical company to realize the present research

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Palomba.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palomba, S., Orio, F., Russo, T. et al. BsmI vitamin D receptor genotypes influence the efficacy of antiresorptive treatments in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. A 1-year multicenter, randomized and controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 16, 943–952 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1800-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1800-5

Keywords

Navigation