Skip to main content
Log in

Feasibility of quantitative ultrasound measurements on the humerus of newborn infants for the assessment of the skeletal status

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS), although widely used in adults has, so far, been scarcely employed in newborn infants and children. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of the use of QUS in newborn children and the factors influencing QUS parameters. In 140 consecutive healthy full-term newborn babies (76 male and 64 female; gestational age: 39.5±1.5 weeks) QUS parameters were assessed within 3 days of the child’s birth at the distal diaphysis of the humerus by use of Bone Profiler, after an appropriate modification of caliper and software. In all subjects we evaluated the amplitude-dependent speed of sound (AD-SoS) (meters per second), the characterizing graphic trace parameters [signal dynamic (SDy), fast wave amplitude (FWA) and bone transmission time (BTT)], SoS (meters per second), that is, the speed of sound calculated on the first peak, and hBTT, that is, the interval time between the first peak of the ultrasound and when this reaches the speed of 1,570 m/s, which is the velocity of ultrasound in the soft tissue. This latter parameter allows one to measure bone tissue independently of soft tissue. QUS measurements were also performed at the phalanges on all mothers (age range 24–38 years), who also completed a self-report questionnaire on their obstetric history, smoking and dietary habits and family history of osteoporosis. In 73 mothers and their children QUS was repeated after 12 months. All QUS parameters were slightly higher in male than in female newborn infants but the difference was not significant. BTT and hBTT of neonates showed a significant relationship with birth weight (r=0.20; P<0.05 and r=0.37; P<0.01, respectively) and with cranial circumference (r=0.22; P<0.05 and r=0.36; P<0.01, respectively). In newborn infants none of the QUS parameters was significantly influenced by maternal QUS or by maternal smoking and calcium intake. In a model of multiple regression analysis the cranial circumference was the only parameter entered into the model, explaining approximately 15% of hBTT value. At month 12 AD-SoS and SoS were slightly lower than at birth (−11% and −0.1%, respectively), whereas both BTT and hBTT showed a significant (P<0001) increase. The present study demonstrated the feasibility of the use of QUS, as assessed by a new measurement approach at the humerus, in the evaluation of skeletal status in neonates. BTT and, above all, hBTT, appears to be the best parameter for both evaluation of skeletal status at birth and monitoring of bone growth in the first year of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gilsanz V (1998) Bone density in children: a review of the available techniques and indications. Eur J Radiol 26:178–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Heaney RP, Matkovic V, (1995) Inadequate peak bone mass. In: Riggs B, Melton LJ III (eds) Osteoporosis: etiology, diagnosis and management, 2nd edn. Raven, Philadelphia, pp 115–131

  3. Matkovic V, Badenhop-Stevens N, Ha EJ, Mobley SL, landoll JD (2001) Factors influencing the development of peak bone mass. In: Burckhardt P, Dawson-Hughes B, Heaney RP (eds) Nutritional aspects of osteoporosis. Academic Press, San Diego pp 15–22

  4. Jones G, Dwyer T (2000) Birth weight, birth length, and bone density in prepubertal children: evidence for an association that may be mediated by genetic factors. Calcif Tissue Int 67:304–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Godfrey K, Walker-Bone K, Robinson S, et al (2001) Neonatal bone mass: influence of parental birth weight, maternal smoking, body composition and activity during pregnancy. J Bone Miner Res 16:1694–1703

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weiler HA, Yuen CK, Seshia MM (2002) Growth and bone mineralization of young adults weighing less than 1500 mg at birth. Early Hum Dev 67:101–112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bowden LS, Jones CJ, Ryan SW (1999) Bone mineralization in ex-preterm infants aged 8 years. Eur J Pediatr 158:658–661

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Avila Diaz M, Flores-Huerta S, Martinez-Muniz I, Amato D (2001) Increment in whole body mineral content associated with weight and length in pre-term and full-term infants during the first 6 months of life. Arch Med Res 32:288–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rauch F, Schoenau E (2001) Changes in bone density during childhood and adolescence: an approach based on bone’s biological organization. J Bone Miner Res 16:597–604

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gluer CC, for The International Quantitative Ultrasound Consensus Group. Quantitative ultrasound techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis: expert agreement on current status. J Bone Miner Res 12:1280–1288

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wuster C, Albanese C, Boschitsch E, et al (2000) Phalangeal osteosonogrammetry study: age-related changes, diagnostic sensitivity, and discrimination power. The Phalangeal Osteosonogrammetry Study Group. J Bone Mineral Res 15:1603–1614

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baroncelli GI, Federico G, Bertelloni S, De Terlizzi F, Cadossi R, Saggese G (2001) Bone quality assessment by quantitative ultrasound of proximal phalanxes of the hand in healthy subjects aged 3–21 years. Pediatr Res 49:713–718

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baroncelli GI, Federico G, Bertelloni S, et al (2003) Assessment of bone quality by quantitative ultrasound of proximal phalanges of the hand and fracture rate in children and adolescents with bone and mineral disorders. Pediatr Res 54:125–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nemet D, Dolfin T, Wolach B (2001) Quantitative ultrasound measurements of bone speed of sound in premature infants. Eur J Pediatr 160:736–740

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wright LL, Glade MJ, Gopal J (1987) The use of transmission ultrasonics to assess bone status in the human newborn. Pediatr Res 22:541–544

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barkmann R, Rohrschneider W, Vierling M, et al (2002) German pediatric reference data for quantitative transverse transmission ultrasound of finger phalanges. Osteoporos Int 13:55–61

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gonnelli S, Montagnani A, Cepollaro C, et al (2000) Quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism before and after surgical treatment. Osteoporos Int 3:255–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Scheuer L, Black S (2000) Developmental juvenile osteology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 272–340

  19. Koo WWK, Hockman EM (2000) Physiologic predictors of lumbar spine bone mass in neonates. Pediatr Res 48:485–489

    Google Scholar 

  20. Koo WWK, Bush AJ, Walters J, Carlson SE (1998) Postnatal development of bone mineral status during infancy. J Am Coll Nutr 17:65–70

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rupich RC, Specker BL, Liew A, Fom N (1996) Gender and race differences in bone mass during infancy. CTI 58:395–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kurl S, Heinonen K, Jurvelin JS, Lansimies E (2002_ Lumbar bone mineral content and density measured using a Lunar DPX densitometer in healthy full-term infants during the first year of life. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 22:222–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. De Terlizzi F, Battista S, Cavani F, Cane V, Cadossi R (2000) Influence of bone tissue density and elasticity on ultrasound propagation: an in vitro study. J Bone Miner Res 15:2458–2466

    Google Scholar 

  24. Montagnani A, Gonnelli S, Cepollaro C, et al (2000) Quantitative ultrasound at phalanxes in healthy Italian males. Osteoporos Int 11:499–504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Seeman E (1999) Osteoporosis in men. Osteoporos Int 2:S97–S110

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. De Terlizzi Francesca (IGEA Biophysics Laboratory, Carpi, Italy) for her valuable technical assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Gonnelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gonnelli, S., Montagnani, A., Gennari, L. et al. Feasibility of quantitative ultrasound measurements on the humerus of newborn infants for the assessment of the skeletal status. Osteoporos Int 15, 541–546 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1558-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1558-1

Keywords

Navigation