Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of the tibia using ultrasonic guided waves in pubertal girls

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare low frequency ultrasonic guided wave measurements with established ultrasound and bone density measurements in terms of their ability to characterize the tibia in pubertal girls. Subjects were 12–14-year-old girls (n=106) who were participating in a calcium and vitamin D intervention study. A prototype low frequency pulse transmission device consisting of a uniaxial scanning mechanism and low frequency transducers orientated perpendicularly to the limb was used to measure two ultrasound velocities in the tibia. The first velocity, V1, was that of the first arriving signal, similar to that measured by existing commercial tibial ultrasound devices. The second velocity, V2, was that of a slower wave propagating at 1,500–2,000 m/s, which has been shown elsewhere to be consistent with the lowest order antisymmetric guided mode in the bone. In addition, commercial ultrasound devices (Omnisense, Sunlight Ltd.; QUS-2, Quidel Corp.) were used to measure the speed of sound (SOS) in the tibia and the radius and attenuation (BUA) in the calcaneus. Cortical bone cross-sectional area (CSA), mineral density (BMD) and cortical thickness (cTh) of the tibia were measured using pQCT, site-matched to the ultrasound measurements. Both V1 and V2 correlated significantly with cortical BMD and with cTh and CSA. On the other hand, tibial SOS correlated with BMD, but not with cTh and CSA. These results indicate that the prototype device using guided waves captures aspects of tibial cortical bone geometry in addition to bone density, thereby potentially offering increased diagnostic information compared to existing tibial ultrasound devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Consensus Development Panel (2002) Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 285:785–795

    Google Scholar 

  2. Elliott ME, Meek PD, Kanous NL, Schill GR, Weinswig PA, Bohlman JP, Zimpel CL, Jensen BC, Walters DR, Sutter SL, Peterson AN, Peterson RM, Binkley NC (2002) Osteoporosis screening by community pharmacists: use of National Osteoporosis Foundation resources. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash) 42:101–110, quiz 110–111

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kanis JA, Gluer CC (2001) An update on the diagnosis and assessment of osteoporosis with densitometry. Osteoporos Int 11:192–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bouxsein ML, Coan BS, Lee SC (1999) Prediction of the strength of the elderly proximal femur by bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements of the heel and tibia. Bone 25:49–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I (2001) Quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density are equally strongly associated with risk factors for osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 16:406–416

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hans D, Dargent-Molina P, Schott AM, Sebert JL, Cormier C, Kotzki PO, Delmas PD, Pouilles JM, Breart G, Meunier PJ (1996) Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study. Lancet 348:511–514

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang C, Ross PD, Yates AJ, Walker RE, Imose K, Emi K, Wasnich RD (1998) Prediction of fracture risk by radiographic absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound: a prospective study. Calcif Tissue Int 63:380–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ross P, Huang C, Davis J, Imose K, Yates J, Vogel J, Wasnich R (1995) Predicting vertebral deformity using bone densitometry at various skeletal sites and calcaneus ultrasound. Bone 16:325–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Camus E, Talmant M, Berger G, Laugier P (2000) Analysis of the axial transmission technique for the assessment of skeletal status. J Acoust Soc Am 108:3058–3065

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gerlanc M, Haddad D, Hyatt GW, Langloh JT, St Hilaire P (1975) Ultrasonic study of normal and fractured bone. Clin Orthop 111:175–180

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Siegel IM, Anast GT, Fields T (1958) The determination of fracture healing by measurement of sound velocity across the fracture site. Surg Gynecol Obstet 107:327–332

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Van der Perre G, Lowet G (1996) In vivo assessment of bone mechanical properties by vibration and ultrasonic wave propagation analysis. Bone 18 [Suppl 1]:29S–35S

  13. Hans D, Fan B, Fuerst T (1999). Non-heel quantitative ultrasound devices. In: Njeh CF, Hans D, Fuerst T, Gluer CC, Genant HK (eds) Quantitative ultrasound: assessment of osteoporosis and bone status. Martin Dunitz, London, pp 145–162

  14. Foldes AJ, Rimon A, Keinan DD, Popovtzer MM (1995) Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia: a novel approach for assessment of bone status. Bone 17:363–367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee SC, Coan BS, Bouxsein ML (1997) Tibial ultrasound velocity measured in situ predicts the material properties of tibial cortical bone. Bone 21:119–125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Prevrhal S, Fuerst T, Fan B, Njeh C, Hans D, Uffmann M, Srivastav S, Genant HK (2001) Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia depends on both cortical density and thickness. Osteoporos Int 12:28–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sievanen H, Cheng S, Ollikainen S, Uusi-Rasi K (2001) Ultrasound velocity and cortical bone characteristics in vivo. Osteoporos Int 12:399–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang SF, Chang CY, Shih C, Teng MM (1997) Measuring tibial cortical bone status by ultrasonic velocity. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei) 60:199–204

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stegman MR, Heaney RP, Recker RR (1995) Comparison of speed of sound ultrasound with single photon absorptiometry for determining fracture odds ratios. J Bone Miner Res 10:346–352

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bossy E, Talmant M, Laugier P (2002) Effect of bone cortical thickness on velocity measurements using ultrasonic axial transmission: a 2D simulation study. J Acoust Soc Am 112:297–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Njeh CF, Hans D, Wu C, Kantorovich E, Sister M, Fuerst T, Genant HK (1999) An in vitro investigation of the dependence on sample thickness of the speed of sound along the specimen. Med Eng Phys 21:651–659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Graff KF (1991) Wave motion in elastic solids. Dover, New York

  23. Viktorov IA (1967) Rayleigh and Lamb waves. Plenum, New York

  24. Cheeke JDN, Li X, Wang Z (1998) Observation of flexural Lamb waves (A0 mode) on water-filled cylindrical shells. J Acoust Soc Am 104:3678–3680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chimenti DE (1997) Guided waves in plates and their use in materials characterization. Appl Mech Rev 50:247–284

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chimenti DE, Martin RW (1991) Nondestructive evaluation of composite laminates by leaky Lamb waves. Ultrasonics 29:13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Karim MR, Mal AK, Bar-Cohen Y (1990) Inversion of leaky Lamb wave data by simplex algorithm. J Acoust Soc Am 88:482–491

    Google Scholar 

  28. Moilanen P, Timonen J, Karkkainen T, Nicholson PHF, Cheng S (2001) Investigation of guided ultrasonic waves in bone phantoms using an axial transmission method. In: Pierce AD (ed) Acoust Soc Am 110:2622

  29. Nicholson PHF, Cheng S, Karkkainen T, Moilanen P, Timonen J (2001) Measurement of guided ultrasonic waves in the human tibia. In: Pierce AD (ed) Acoust Soc Am 110:2622

  30. Nicholson PHF, Moilanen P, Karkkainen T, Timonen J, Cheng S (2002) Guided ultrasonic waves in long bones: modelling, experiment and in vivo application. Physiol Meas 23:755–768

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cheng S, Tylavsky F, Karkkainen M, Lyytikainen A, Koistinen A, Mahonen A, Halleen J, Vaananen K, Kroger H, Lamberg-Allardt C (2002) Low 25-hydroxy-vitamin D concentrations are associated with lower cortical bone mass in prepubertal Finnish girls. Am J Clin Nutr (in press)

  32. Lowet G, Van der Perre G (1996) Ultrasound velocity measurement in long bones: measurement method and simulation of ultrasound wave propagation. J Biomech 29:1255–1262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gluer CC, Blake G, Lu Y, Blunt BA, Jergas M, Genant HK (1995) Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporos Int 5:262–270

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ms. Pia-Leena Salo, Leila Vilkki and Mr. Erkki Helkala for their valuable work and technical assistance on this project. This work was supported by the Academy of Finland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35 (YFL), 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland

    P. Moilanen & J. Timonen

  2. Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland

    P. H. F. Nicholson, Q. Wang & S. Cheng

  3. Department of Mathematical Information Technology, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland

    T. Kärkkäinen

Authors
  1. P. Moilanen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. H. F. Nicholson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. Kärkkäinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Q. Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. Timonen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. S. Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Moilanen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moilanen, P., Nicholson, P.H.F., Kärkkäinen, T. et al. Assessment of the tibia using ultrasonic guided waves in pubertal girls. Osteoporos Int 14, 1020–1027 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1528-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1528-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation