Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dental panoramic radiograph as a tool to detect postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density: untrained general dental practitioners' diagnostic performance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The detection of postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD) is an important strategy to reduce the incidence of osteoporotic fracture. Recent studies suggested that incidental findings on dental panoramic radiographs may be used as a tool to detect women with low BMD. However, little is known whether this finding is sufficiently assessed by untrained general dental practitioners (GDPs). The purpose of this study was to investigate: (1) the observer agreement and (2) the diagnostic efficacy in detecting women with low BMD, when untrained GDPs assess the appearance (normal or eroded) of the mandibular inferior cortex on dental panoramic radiographs of postmenopausal women. Twenty-seven GDPs were asked to classify the appearance of the mandibular inferior cortex on dental panoramic radiographs of 100 postmenopausal women who had completed BMD assessments of the lumbar spine and of the femoral neck. Intra-and inter-observer agreements were analyzed with kappa statistics. The diagnostic efficacy (sensitivity, specificity and predictive values) was analyzed by comparing two groups classified by the mandibular inferior cortex (women with normal and women with eroded mandibular inferior cortex) with those classified by BMD (women with normal BMD and women with osteopenia or osteoporosis). The mean sensitivity and specificity were 77% and 40%, respectively, when BMD of the lumbar spine was used as standard and 75% and 39%, respectively, when BMD of the femoral neck comprised the standard. Nineteen untrained GDPs (70%) presented a moderate to almost perfect intra-observer agreement. We conclude that dental panoramic radiograph may be used in clinical dental practice to identify postmenopausal women who have undetected low BMD and should undergo further testing with bone densitometry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gabriel SE, Tosteson AN, Leibson CL et al. (2002) Direct medical costs attributable to osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 13:323–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Trombetti A, Herrmann F, Hoffmeyer P, Schurch MA, Bonjour JP, Rizzoli R (2002) Survival and potential years of life lost after hip fracture in men and age-matched women. Osteoporos Int 13:731–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Siris ES, Miller PD, Barrett-Connor E et al. (2001) Identification and fracture outcomes of undiagnosed low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment. JAMA 286:2815–2822

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Michaëlsson K, Bergström R, Mallmin H, Holmberg L, Wolk A, Ljunghall S (1996) Screening for osteopenia and osteoporosis: selection by body composition. Osteoporos Int 6:120–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lydick E, Cook K, Turpin J, Melton M, Stine R, Byrnes C (1998) Development and validation of a simple questionnaire to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density. Am J Manag Care 4:37–48

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Weinstein L, Ullery B (2000) Identification of at-risk women for osteoporosis screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:547–549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Kreiger N, Mclsaac WJ, Darlington GA, Tu JV (2000) Development and validation of the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry. CMAJ 162:1289–1294

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujiwara S, Masunari N, Suzuki G, Ross PD (2001) Performance of osteoporosis risk indices in a Japanese population. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 62:586–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. National Osteoporosis Foundation (1998) Status report. Osteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis and treatment and cost-effectiveness analysis. Osteoporos Int 8:S1–S80

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Murray TM, Mclsaac WJ, Joseph L, Brown JP (2001) Evaluation of decision rules for referring women for bone densitometry by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. JAMA 286:57–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nissen N, Vestergaard P, Tofteng CL et al. (2002) Can the SCORE algorithm reduce the need for bone densitometry? Results from the Danish Osteoporosis Prevention Study. J Bone Miner Res 17:S360

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klemetti E, Kolmakov S, Kroger H (1994) Pantomography in assessment of the osteoporosis risk group. Scand J Dent Res 102:68–72

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Taguchi A, Suei Y, Ohtsuka M, Otani K, Tanimoto K, Ohtaki M (1996) Usefulness of panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis in women. Width and morphology of inferior cortex of the mandible. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 25:263–267

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Taguchi A, Sanada M, Krall EA et al. (2003) Relationship between dental panoramic radiographic findings and biochemical markers of bone turnover. J Bone Miner Res (in press)

  15. Bollen AM, Taguchi A, Hujoel PP, Hollender LG (2000) Case-control study on self-reported osteoporotic fractures and mandibular cortical bone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 90:518–524

    Google Scholar 

  16. Devlin H, Horner K (2002) Mandibular radiomorphometric indices in the diagnosis of reduced skeletal bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int 13:373–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Orimo H, Hayashi Y, Fukunaga M et al. (2001) Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis year 2000 revision. J Bone Miner Metab 19:331–337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

  20. Cohen SN, Friedlander AH, Jolly DA, Date L (2002) Carotid calcification on panoramic radiographs: an important marker for vascular risk. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 94:510–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Kagawa and 27 general dental practitioners in Kure City Dental Association, Hiroshima, for their cooperation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akira Taguchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nakamoto, T., Taguchi, A., Ohtsuka, M. et al. Dental panoramic radiograph as a tool to detect postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density: untrained general dental practitioners' diagnostic performance. Osteoporos Int 14, 659–664 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1419-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1419-y

Keywords

Navigation