Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Simulation of a complete reflected shock tunnel showing a vortex mechanism for flow contamination

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Shock Waves Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Simulations of a complete reflected shock tunnel facility have been performed with the aim of providing a better understanding of the flow through these facilities. In particular, the analysis is focused on the premature contamination of the test flow with the driver gas. The axisymmetric simulations model the full geometry of the shock tunnel and incorporate an iris-based model of the primary diaphragm rupture mechanics, an ideal secondary diaphragm and account for turbulence in the shock tube boundary layer with the Baldwin-Lomax eddy viscosity model. Two operating conditions were examined: one resulting in an over-tailored mode of operation and the other resulting in approximately tailored operation. The accuracy of the simulations is assessed through comparison with experimental measurements of static pressure, pitot pressure and stagnation temperature. It is shown that the widely-accepted driver gas contamination mechanism in which driver gas ‘jets’ along the walls through action of the bifurcated foot of the reflected shock, does not directly transport the driver gas to the nozzle at these conditions. Instead, driver gas laden vortices are generated by the bifurcated reflected shock. These vortices prevent jetting of the driver gas along the walls and convect driver gas away from the shock tube wall and downstream into the nozzle. Additional vorticity generated by the interaction of the reflected shock and the contact surface enhances the process in the over-tailored case. However, the basic mechanism appears to operate in a similar way for both the over-tailored and the approximately tailored conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stalker, R.J., Crane, K.C.A.: Driver gas contamination in ahigh-enthalpy reflected shock tunnel. AIAA J. 16277–278 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Skinner, K.A.: Mass spectrometry in shock tunnel experiments of hypersonic combustion. PhD thesis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia (1994)

  3. Paull, A.: A simple shock tunnel driver gas detector. Shock Waves6(5), 309–312 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mark, H.: The interaction of a reflected shock wave with theboundary layer in a shock tube. J. Aeronaut. Sci. 304–306April (1957)

  5. Burtschell, Y., Cardoso, M., Zeitoun, D.E.:Numerical analysis of reducing driver gas contamination in impulseshock tunnels. AIAA J. 39(12), 2357–2365 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cardoso, M., Burtschell, Y., Zeitoun, D., Abgrall, R.: Numerical simulation of different methods for avoidingdriver gas contamination in shock tunnels. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on ShockWaves, vol. 1, pp. 537–542. Panther Publishing, Great Keppel, Australia (1997)

  7. Sharma, S.P., Wilson, G.J.: Test times in hypersonic shock tubes.In: 33rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA Paper95-0713, Reno, Nevada (1995)

  8. Wilson, G.J.: Numerical studies of high-enthalpy impulsefacilities. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium onShock Waves, vol. 1. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pty. Ltd., California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California (1995)

  9. Chue, R.S.M., Eitelberg, G.: Studies of the transient flows inhigh enthalpy shock tunnels. Exp. Fluids 25 474–486(1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Badcock, K.J.: A numerical simulation of boundary layer effects ina shock tube. Int. J. Num. Methods Fluids 14 1151–1171(1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Austin, J.M., Jacobs, P.A., Kong, M.C., Barker, P., Littleton, B.N., Gammie, R.: The small shock tunnel facility at UQ.Department of Mechanical Engineering Report 2/1997, The Universityof Queensland, Brisbane July (1997)

  12. Craddock, C.S., Jacobs, P.A., Gammie, R.: Operational instructionsfor the small shock tunnel at UQ. Department of MechanicalEngineering Report 8/1998, The Universityof Queensland, Brisbane July (1998)

  13. Jacobs, P.A.: MB_CNS: A computer program for the simulationof transient compressible flows. Department of MechanicalEngineering Report 10/1996, The University of Queensland, BrisbaneOctober (1996)

  14. Wada Y., Liou, M.S.: A flux splitting scheme with high-resolutionand robustness for discontinuities. In: 32nd AIAA AerospaceSciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 94-0083, Reno, NV (1994)

  15. Macrossan, M.N.: The equilibrium flux method for the calculationof flows with non-equilibrium chemical reactions. J. Comput.Phys. 80(1), 204–231 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Goozée, R.J.: Simulation of a complete shock tunnel withparallel computer codes. PhD thesis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia (2003)

  17. Gordon, S., McBride, B.J.: Computer program for calculation ofcomplex chemical equilibrium compositions and applications; I.Analysis. Reference Publication 1311, NASA October (1994)

  18. McBride, B.J., Gordon, S.: Computer program for calculation ofcomplex chemical equilibrium compositions and applications; II.Users manual and program description. Reference Publication1311, NASA June (1996)

  19. Rothkopf, E.M., Low, W.: Diaphragm opening process in shock tubes.Phys. Fluids 17(6), 1169–1173 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Baldwin, B.S., Lomax H.: Thin layer approximation and algebraicmodel for separated turbulent flows. In: 16th AIAA AerospaceSciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 78-257, Huntsville, Alabama (1978)

  21. Buttsworth, D.R., Jacobs, P.A.: Total temperature measurements in ashock tunnel facility. In: Thompson, M.C., Hourigan, K. (eds.) 13thAustralasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, Melbourne, pp. 51–54December (1998)

  22. Weber, Y.S., Oran, E.S., Boris, J.P., Anderson, J.D., Jr.: Thenumerical simulation of shock bifurcation near the end wall of a shock tube. Phys. Fluids 7 2475–2488 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cambier, J.L., Tokarcik, S., Prabhu, D.K.: Numerical simulationsof unsteady flow in a hypersonic shock tunnel facility. In: 17th AIAA Aerospace Ground Testing Conference, pp. 127–140, Nashville, TN July (1992)

  24. Petrie-Repar, P.J.: Numerical simulation of diaphragm rupture. PhDthesis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia (2000)

  25. Sudani, N., Valiferdowsi, B., Hornung, H.G.: Test time increase bydelaying driver gas contamination for reflected shock tunnels.AIAA J. 38(9), 1497–1503 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chue, R.S.M., Itoh, K.: Numerical analysis of reflectedshock/boundary layer interaction in a high enthalpy shock tunnel.In: Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on ShockWaves. World Scientific Publishing, California Institute ofTechnology, Pasadena, California (1995)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia

    R. J. Goozée & P. A. Jacobs

  2. Faculty of Engineering and Surveying, The University of Southern Queensland, Queensland, Australia

    D. R. Buttsworth

Authors
  1. R. J. Goozée
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. A. Jacobs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. R. Buttsworth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. R. Buttsworth.

Additional information

Communicated by R. R. Boyce

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goozée, R.J., Jacobs, P.A. & Buttsworth, D.R. Simulation of a complete reflected shock tunnel showing a vortex mechanism for flow contamination. Shock Waves 15, 165–176 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-006-0015-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-006-0015-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation