Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of the deflagration to detonation transition: reduction of length and time of transition

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Shock Waves Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this experimental investigation is the study of Deflagration to Detonation Transition (DDT) in tubes in order to (i) reduce both run-up distance and time of transition (L DDT and t DDT) in connection with Pulsed Detonation Engine applications and to (ii) attempt to scale L DDT with λCJ (the detonation cellular structure width). In DDT, the production of turbulence during the long flame run-up can lead to L DDT values of several meters. To shorten L DDT, an experimental set-up is designed to quickly induce highly turbulent initial flow. It consists of a double chamber terminated with a perforated plate of high Blockage Ratio (BR) positioned at the beginning of a 26 mm inner diameter tube containing a “Shchelkin spiral” of BR ≈ 0.5. The study involves stoichiometric reactive mixtures of H2, CH4, C3H8, and C2H4 with oxygen and diluted with N2 in order to obtain the same cell width λCJ≈10 mm at standard conditions. The results show that a shock-flame system propagating with nearly the isobaric speed of sound of combustion products, called the choking regime, is rapidly obtained. This experimental set-up allows a L DDT below 40 cm for the mixtures used and a ratio L DDTCJ ranging from 23 to 37. The transition distance seems to depend on the reduced activation energy (E a/RT c) and on the normalized heat of reaction (Q/a 0 2). The higher these quantities are, the shorter the ratio L DDTCJ is.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peraldi, O., Knystautas, R., Lee, J.H.: Criteria for transition to detonation in tubes. In: Proceedings of the 21st Symposium (International) on Combustion, pp. 1629–1637 (1986)

  2. Dorofeev, S.B., Sidorov, V.P., Kuznetsov, M.S., Matsukov, I.D.: Effect of scale on the onset of detonation. Shock Waves 10, 137–149 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Urtiew, P.A., Oppenheim, A.K.: Onset of detonation. Comb. Flame 9, 405–407 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Veser, A., Breitung, W., Dorofeev, S.B.: Run-up distances to supersonic flames in obstacle-laden tubes. J. Phys. IV France 12, 333–340 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bouhard, F., Veyssiere, B., Leyer, J.C., Chaineaux, J.: Explosion in a vented vessel connected to a duct. AIAA Prog. Astronaut. Aeronaut. 134, 85–103 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Smirnov, N.N., Tyurnikov M.V.: Experimental investigation of deflagration to detonation transition in hydrocarbon–air gaseous mixtures. Comb. Flame 100, 661–668 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lieberman, D.H., Parkin, K.L., Shepherd, J.E.: Detonation initiation by a hot turbulent jet for use in pulse detonation engines. AIAA 02-3909 (2002)

  8. Kaneshige, M., Shepherd, J.: Detonation database. Technical Report FM97-8, GALCIT, July 1997: http://www.galcit. caltech.edu/detn_db/html/

  9. Knystautas, R., Guirao, C., Lee, J.H., Sulmistras, A.: Measurements of cell size in hydrocarbon-air mixtures and predictions of critical tube diameter, critical initiation energy, and detonability limits. AIAA Prog. Astronaut. Aeronaut. 94, 23–37 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Matignon, C.: Etude de la dtonation de deux mlanges stoechiomtriques (CH4/H2/O2/N2 et CH4/C2H6/O2/N2). Thèse de l'université de Poitiers (2000)

  11. Kee, R.J., Grcar, J.F., Smooke, M.D.: A fortran program for modeling steady laminar one-dimensional premixed flames. Sandia National Laboratories Technical Report SAND85-8240, reprinted May 1994

  12. Kee, R.J., Rupley, F.M., Miller, J.A.: Chemkin, I.I: A fortran kinetics package for the analysis of gas-phase chemical kinetics. Sandia National Laboratory Technical Report SAND89-8009, reprinted August 1993

  13. Smith, G.P., Golden, D.M., Frenklach, M., Moriarty, N.W., Eiteneer, B., Goldenberg, M., Bowman, C.T., Hanson, R.K., Song, S., Gardiner, W.C. Jr., Lissianski, V.V., Qin, Z.: (2000) http://www.me.berkeley.edu/gri_mech/

  14. Chao, J., Lee, J.H.S.: The propagation mechanism of high speed turbulent deflagrations. Shock Waves 12, 277–289 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Teodorczyk, A., Lee, J.H., Knystautas, R.: Propagation mechanism of quasi-detonations. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Symposium (International) on Combustion, pp. 1723–1731 (1988)

  16. Lee, J.H.S., Knystautas, R., Freiman, A.: High speed turbulent deflagrations and transition to detonation in H2–air mixtures. Comb. Flame 56, 227–239 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ciccarelli, G., Dubocage, P.: Flame acceleration in fuel–air mixtures at elevated initial temperatures. AIAA Joint Propulsion Conference (2002)

  18. Moen, I.O., Sulmistras, A., Thomas, G.O., Bjerketvedt, D., Thibault, P.A.: Influence of cellular regularity on the behaviour of gaseous detonations. AIAA Prog. Astronaut. Aeronaut. 106, 220–243 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pinard, P.F., Higgins, A.J., Lee, J.H.S.: The effects of NO2 addition on deflagration-to-detonation transition. Comb. Flame 136, 146–154 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson, R.G., McIntosh, A.C., Brindley, J.: Evolution of a fast flame behind an induction zone. Shock Waves 6, 225–231 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Sorin.

Additional information

Communicated by J. E. Shepherd

PACS 47.40.Rs · 47.60.+i · 47.70.Pq · 47.80.Cb

This paper was based on the work that was presented at the 19th International Colloquium on the Dynamics of Explosions and Reactive Systems, Hakone, Japan, July 27–August 1, 2003.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sorin, R., Zitoun, R. & Desbordes, D. Optimization of the deflagration to detonation transition: reduction of length and time of transition. Shock Waves 15, 137–145 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-006-0007-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-006-0007-4

Keywords

Navigation