Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
Postoperative urinary retention is common after urogynecologic procedures. Our objective is to determine the efficacy of force of stream (FOS) assessment without a visual analog scale for postoperative catheter management.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 110 women undergoing an inpatient gynecologic procedure. They were asked to subjectively assess FOS after surgery without a visual analog scale. If it was 50% or better than the usual preoperative void, they were discharged home without a catheter. If < 50%, the catheter was replaced and the patients were sent home and asked to follow up in 3 to 5 days for another void trial.
Results
Average age was 56.9 ± 10.2 years; 63.6% underwent surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, 23.6% underwent sling for urinary incontinence, and 12.7% underwent a combination of both. Force of stream was > 50% in 93.6% of the patients; 6.4% had force of stream < 50% and hence were discharged home with a Foley catheter. Only two patients (1.8%) were discharged without a Foley catheter and returned to the emergency department for signs of urinary retention. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 77.8%, 100%, 100% and 98.1%, respectively.
Conclusion
The subjective assessment of flow of stream is a reliable and safe method to assess postoperative voiding. Given it is less invasive than backfilling the bladder and easier than using a bladder scan, it should be the primary method to assess postoperative voiding.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Accessed October 22, 2020. https://www.acog.org/en/Clinical/ClinicalGuidance/PracticeBulletin/Articles/2019/11/PelvicOrganProlapse
Smith FJ, Holman CDJ, Moorin RE, Tsokos N. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(5):1096–100. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f73729.
Smorgick N, DeLancey J, Patzkowsky K, Advincula A, Song A, As-Sanie S. Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy for benign indications. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(3):581–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182638c3a.
Kesty K, Edenfield A, Castro D, et al. Subjective versus objective determination of bladder emptying following urogynecological surgery: “do you feel that you completely emptied your bladder?” Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(9):1899–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04216-0.
Dreijer B, Møller MH, Bartholdy J. Post-operative urinary retention in a general surgical population. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28(3):190–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013e328341ac3b.
Barber MD, Kleeman S, Karram MM, et al. Transobturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(3):611–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318162f22e.
Brackmann M, Carballo E, Uppal S, Torski J, Reynolds RK, McLean K. Implementation of a standardized voiding management protocol to reduce unnecessary re-catheterization - A quality improvement project. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;157(2):487–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.036.
Alas A, Hidalgo R, Espaillat L, Devakumar H, Davila GW, Hurtado E. Does spinal anesthesia lead to postoperative urinary retention in same-day urogynecology surgery? A retrospective review. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(8):1283–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03893-1.
Ahmed MR, Sayed Ahmed WA, Atwa KA, Metwally L. Timing of urinary catheter removal after uncomplicated total abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;176:60–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.02.038.
Taylor DL, Sierra T, Duenas-Garcia OF, et al. Accuracy of bladder scanner for the assessment of postvoid residual volumes in women With pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020;26(10):640–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000645.
Dağdeviren H, Cengiz H, Helvacıoğlu Ç, Heydarova U, Kaya C, Ekin M. A comparison of normal and high post-void residual urine and urodynamic parameters in women with overactive bladder. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;14(4):210–3. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.84666.
LaGrone LN, Sadasivam V, Kushner AL, Groen RS. A review of training opportunities for ultrasonography in low and middle income countries. Trop Med Int Health. 2012;17(7):808–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.03014.x.
Tunitsky-Bitton E, Murphy A, Barber MD, Goldman HB, Vasavada S, Jelovsek JE. Assessment of voiding after sling: a randomized trial of 2 methods of postoperative catheter management after midurethral sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(5):597.e1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.033.
Williams KS, Pilkinton ML, Shalom DF, Winkler HA. A randomized controlled trial comparing two voiding trials after midurethral sling with or without colporrhaphy. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(8):1247–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3783-3.
Prevention of Infection After Gynecologic Procedures. Accessed November 4, 2020. https://www.acog.org/en/Clinical/ClinicalGuidance/PracticeBulletin/Articles/2018/06/PreventionofInfectionAfterGynecologicProcedures
Lo T-S, Shailaja N, Hsieh W-C, Uy-Patrimonio MC, Yusoff FM, Ibrahim R. Predictors of voiding dysfunction following extensive vaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(4):575–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3144-z.
Carter-Brooks CM, Zyczynski HM, Moalli PA, Brodeur PG, Shepherd JP. Early catheter removal after pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: a randomized trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(8):1203–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3641-3.
Baldini G, Bagry H, Aprikian A, Carli F. Postoperative urinary retention: anesthetic and perioperative considerations. Anesthesiology. 2009;110(5):1139–57. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819f7aea.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
OA Al Baini: design, data collection/analysis, interpretation, draft, revision.
SF Farah: design, data collection/analysis, interpretation, draft, revision.
KJ Jallad: analysis, draft, review; corresponding author.
They all agree to take responsibility and be accountable for the contents of the article and for the resolution of any related questions on this work. KJ is the corresponding author. He takes primary responsibility for communicating with the journal during all stages and responding to all queries.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Albaini, O., Farah, S. & Jallad, K. The efficacy of force of stream assessment for post-operative catheter management: a retrospective cohort study. Int Urogynecol J 33, 3291–3296 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05096-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05096-7