Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sonographic fetal head circumference and the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury following vaginal delivery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

High birth weight is strongly associated with OASIS; nevertheless, it has not been determined which biometric characteristics most affect OASIS occurrence. We aimed to evaluate the association of estimated fetal head circumference with OASIS occurrence among primiparous women delivering by unassisted vaginal delivery.

Methods

A retrospective study included all primiparous women who delivered at term by spontaneous vaginal delivery from 2011–2019. Women were allocated to two groups: (1) those who experienced OASIS and (2) those who did not experience OASIS. Risk factors for OASIS were analyzed.

Results

Overall, 7646 women were included in the study cohort. Of those, 119/7646 (1.6%; 95% CI, 1.3–1.9%) experienced OASIS. Sonographic head circumference and birth weight did not vary between groups. Prolonged second stage was more common in the OASIS group [23 (19%) vs. 986 (13.3%), 1.58 OR (95% CI 1.003–2.51, p = 0.04)]. Absence of epidural analgesia was more common in the OASIS group [30 (25%) vs. 1197 (15.9%), 1.8 OR (95% CI 1.1–2.7, p = 0.006)]. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, the lack of epidural analgesia and duration of second stage of labor were both independently positively associated with OASIS [adjusted OR 2.67 (95% CI 1.55–4.62), p < 0.001, adjusted OR 1.23 (95% CI 1.11–1.43), p < 0.001, respectively)].

Conclusion

Sonographic head circumference and birth weight are not associated with OASIS occurrence among primiparous women delivering by an unassisted vaginal delivery. Prolonged second stage and the use of epidural analgesia are modifiable risk factors among these women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

OASIS:

Obstetric anal sphincter injury

References

  1. Waldman R. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 198: prevention and management of obstetric lacerations at vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:185.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Friedman AM, Ananth CV, Prendergast E, D’Alton ME, Wright JD. Evaluation of third-degree and fourth-degree laceration rates as quality indicators. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:927–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dudding TC, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA. Obstetric anal sphincter injury: incidence, risk factors, and management. Ann Surg. 2008;247:224–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nordenstam J, Altman D, Brismar S, Zetterström J. Natural progression of anal incontinence after childbirth. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20:1029–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bols EM, Hendriks EJ, Berghmans BC, Baeten CG, Nijhuis JG, de Bie RA. A systematic review of etiological factors for postpartum fecal incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89:302–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Laine K, Gissler M, Pirhonen J. Changing incidence of anal sphincter tears in four Nordic countries through the last decades. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;146:71–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jangö H, Langhoff-Roos J, Rosthøj S, Sakse A. Modifiable risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(59):e51–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gundabattula SR, Surampudi K. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) at a tertiary centre in south India. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29:391–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Räisänen S, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Gissler M, Heinonen S. High episiotomy rate protects from obstetric anal sphincter ruptures: a birth register-study on delivery intervention policies in Finland. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39:457–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Leeuw JW, de Wit C, Kuijken JP, Bruinse HW. Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery. BJOG. 2008;115:104–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kabiri D, Lipschuetz M, Cohen SM, Yagel O, Levitt L, Herzberg S, et al. Vacuum extraction failure is associated with a large head circumference. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32:3325–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lipschuetz M, Cohen SM, Ein-Mor E, Sapir H, Hochner-Celnikier D, Porat S, et al. A large head circumference is more strongly associated with unplanned cesarean or instrumental delivery and neonatal complications than high birthweight. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(833):e831–833.e812.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Valsky DV, Lipschuetz M, Bord A, Eldar I, Messing B, Hochner-Celnikier D, et al. Fetal head circumference and length of second stage of labor are risk factors for levator ani muscle injury, diagnosed by 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(91):e91–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carpenter MW, Coustan DR. Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;144:768–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bulletins-Obstetrics ACoOaGCoP. ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 49, December 2003: Dystocia and augmentation of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:1445–54.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Da Silva CF, Deter RL, Figueras F, Ghi T, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53:715–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, Deter RL, Park SK. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. Radiology. 1984;150:535–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kudish B, Sokol RJ, Kruger M. Trends in major modifiable risk factors for severe perineal trauma, 1996-2006. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;102:165–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Baghestan E, Irgens LM, Børdahl PE, Rasmussen S. Trends in risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in Norway. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:25–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Melamed N, Yogev Y, Danon D, Mashiach R, Meizner I, Ben-Haroush A. Sonographic estimation of fetal head circumference: how accurate are we? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:65–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Richter HE, Brumfield CG, Cliver SP, Burgio KL, Neely CL, Varner RE. Risk factors associated with anal sphincter tear: a comparison of primiparous patients, vaginal births after cesarean deliveries, and patients with previous vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:1194–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Revicky V, Nirmal D, Mukhopadhyay S, Morris EP, Nieto JJ. Could a mediolateral episiotomy prevent obstetric anal sphincter injury? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;150:142–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gerdin E, Sverrisdottir G, Badi A, Carlsson B, Graf W. The role of maternal age and episiotomy in the risk of anal sphincter tears during childbirth. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;47:286–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Loewenberg-Weisband Y, Grisaru-Granovsky S, Ioscovich A, Samueloff A, Calderon-Margalit R. Epidural analgesia and severe perineal tears: a literature review and large cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27:1864–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Edqvist M, Hildingsson I, Mollberg M, Lundgren I, Lindgren H. Midwives’ management during the second stage of labor in relation to second-degree tears–an experimental study. Birth. 2017;44:86–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ginath S, Mizrachi Y, Bar J, Condrea A, Kovo M. Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) in Israel: a review of the incidence and risk factors. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2017;8.

  27. Levin G, Rottenstreich A, Cahan T, Ilan H, Shai D, Tsur A, Meyer R. Does birthweight have a role in the effect of episiotomy on anal sphincter injury? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2020.

Download references

Funding

There were no study funding or competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel

    Raanan Meyer, Hadas Ilan & Menachem Alcalay

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, POB 12000, Jerusalem, Israel

    Amihai Rottenstreich & Gabriel Levin

  3. Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Michal Zamir

  4. Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel

    Edward Ram

Authors
  1. Raanan Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amihai Rottenstreich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michal Zamir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hadas Ilan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Edward Ram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Menachem Alcalay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gabriel Levin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Levin.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Raanan Meyer and Amihai Rottenstreich contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meyer, R., Rottenstreich, A., Zamir, M. et al. Sonographic fetal head circumference and the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury following vaginal delivery. Int Urogynecol J 31, 2285–2290 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04296-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04296-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation