Abstract
Surgical treatments for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and urinary incontinence (UI) have greatly changed in recent years. Prompted by increases in reports of adverse outcomes in relation to such treatments, several scientific societies and researchers have emphasized providing patients with thorough counseling before treating them. Patient-centered communication has become the gold standard for excellence in clinical care. This challenges clinicians to be cognizant of their patients’ perspectives, motivations, expectations, fears, concerns, and social contexts to enable them to reach a shared understanding with patients. Considering this, urogynecology counseling represents a crucial process through which women can gain a clear understanding of their clinical condition and the risks and benefits of potential treatment options. However, many urogynecologists believe that proposing a treatment and providing only enough detail to secure informed consent constitutes counseling. This article is intended to describe good counseling for women undergoing urogynecological surgery and to suggest optimal methodologies for implementation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Karmakar D, Dwyer PL. Failure of expectations in vaginal surgery: lack of appropriate consent, goals and expectations of surgery. Curr Urol Rep. 2016;17(12):87.
Del Piccolo L, Goss C. People-centred care: new research needs and methods in doctor-patient communication. challenges in mental health. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2012;21(2):145–9.
Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. How to improve communication between doctors and patients. Learning more about the decision making context is important. BMJ. 2000;320(7244):1220–1.
Pakbaz M, Rolfsman E, Löfgren M. Are women adequately informed before gynaecological surgery? BMC Womens Health. 2017;17(1):68.
Brubaker L, Shull B. EGGS for patient-centered outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2005;16(3):171–3.
Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. (1999). Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49(5):651–61.
Joosten EA, DeFuentes-Merillas L, de Weert GH, Sensky T, van der Staak CP, de Jong CA. Systematic review of the effects of shared decision making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother Psychosom. 2008;77(4):219–26.
Pakbaz M, Persson M, Lofgren M, Mogren IA. Hiddendisorder until the pieces fall into place a qualitative study of vaginal prolapse. BMC Womens Health. 2010;10:18.
Pakbaz M, Rolfsman E, Mogren I, Lofgren M. Vaginal prolapse perceptions and healthcare seeking behavior among women propr to gynecological surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(10):1115–20.
Powell R, Scott NW, Manyande A, Bruce J, Vögele C, Byrne-Davis LM, Unsworth M, Osmer C, Johnston M. Psychological preparation and postoperative outcomes for adults undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;(5):CD008646.
Brazell HD, O'Sullivan DM, Forrest A, Greene JF. Effect of a decision aid on decision making for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21(4):231–5.
Stacey D, Legare F, Lewis K, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4:CD001431.
Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;(4):CD004014.
Jelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD. Pelvic organ prolapse. Lancet. 2007;369(9566):1027–38.
Sullivan SA, Davidson ER, Bretschneider CE, Liberty AL, Geller EJ. Patient characteristics associated with treatment choice for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(5):811–6.
Takase-Sanchez MM, Brooks HM, Hale DS, Heit MH. Obliterative surgery for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a patient survey on reasons for surgery selection and postoperative decision regret and satisfaction. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21(6):325–31.
Ziegelmann M, Köhler TS, Bailey GC, Miest T, Alom M, Trost L. Surgical patient selection and counseling. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(4):609–19.
Khoder W, Hom E, Guanzon A, Rose S, Hale D, Heit M. Patient satisfaction and regret with decision differ between outcomes in the composite definition of success after reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(4):613–20.
Hullfish KL. Pelvic floor dysfunction--what do women really want? J Urol. 2008;179(6):2092–3.
Welliver C, Sulaver R, Whittington A, et al. Analyzing why men seek treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms and factors associated with nonimprovement. Urology. 2015;86(5):862–7.
Bovbjerg VE, Trowbridge ER, Barber MD, Martirosian TE, Steers WD, Hullfish KL. Patient centered treatment goals for pelvic floor disorders: association with quality-of-life and patient satisfaction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(5):568.
Rodriguez-Osorio CA, Dominguez-Cherit G. Medical decision making: paternalism versus patient-centered (autonomous) care. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008;14(6):708–13.
Sturmberg JP, Cilliers P. Time and the consultation--an argument for a 'certain slowness'. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15(5):881–5.
Digesu GA, Swift S, Handley V. Informed consent checklists for midurethral slings: a common-sense approach. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(11):1639–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3456-7.
Vuyk HD, Zijlker TD. Psychosocial aspect of patient counseling and selection: a surgeon’s perspective. Facial Plast Surg. 1995;11(2):55–60.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Balzarro, M., Rubilotta, E., Goss, C. et al. Counseling in urogynecology: A difficult task, or simply good surgeon–patient communication?. Int Urogynecol J 29, 943–948 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3673-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3673-8