Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors associated with urinary incontinence in middle-aged women: a population-based household survey

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The objective was to determine the prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) and factors associated in a sample of Brazilian middle-aged women.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted between September 2012 and June 2013 with 749 women. UI was defined as any complaint of involuntary loss of urine. The independent variables were sociodemographic data and health-related habits and problems. Statistical analysis was carried out using Chi-squared test and Poisson regression.

Results

The mean age was 52.5 (±4.4) years. The prevalence of UI was 23.6 %. Of these, 48 (6.4 %) had stress urinary incontinence, 59 (7.8 %) urinary urgency, and 70 (9.5 %) had mixed urinary incontinence. In the final statistical model, self-perception of health as fair/poor/very poor (PR: 1.90; 95 % CI, 1.45–2.49; P < 0.001), ≥1 vaginal deliveries (PR: 1.84; 95 % CI, 1.35–2.50; P < 0.001), higher body mass index (PR: 1.04; 95 % CI, 1.02–1.06; P = 0.001), vaginal dryness (PR: 1.60; 95 % CI, 1.23–2.08; P = 0.001), current or previous hormone therapy (PR: 1.38; 95 % CI, 1.06–1.81; P = 0.019), pre-/perimenopause (PR: 1.42; 95 % CI, 1.06–1.91; P = 0.021), and previous hysterectomy (PR: 1.41; 95 % CI, 1.03–1.92; P = 0.031) were associated with a greater prevalence of UI. Current or previous use of soy products to treat menopausal symptoms was associated with a lower prevalence of UI (PR: 0.43; 95 % CI, 0.24–0.78; P = 0.006).

Conclusions

Several factors are associated with UI in middle-aged Brazilian women. The results highlight the importance of carrying out interventions aimed at reducing modifiable factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(10):4–120.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee YS, Lee KS, Jung JH, Han DH, Oh SJ, Seo JT, et al. Prevalence of overactive bladder, urinary incontinence, and lower urinary tract symptoms: results of Korean EPIC study. World J Urol. 2011;29(2):185–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Quinn SD, Domoney C. The effects of hormones on urinary incontinence in postmenopausal women. Climacteric. 2009;12(2):106–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sherburn M, Guthrie JR, Dudley EC, O’Connell HE, Dennerstein L. Is incontinence associated with menopause? Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(4):628–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Juliato CRT, Baccaro LF, Pedro AO, Costa-Paiva L, Lui-Filho J, Pinto-Neto AM. Subjective urinary urgency in middle age women: a population-based study. Maturitas. 2016;85:82–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Censo 2010. Available from: http://www.ibge.gov.br. Accessed March 2011.

  7. Pedro AO, Pinto-Neto AM, Costa-Paiva LH, et al. [Climacteric syndrome: a population-based study in Campinas, SP, Brazil.] Rev Saude Publica. 2003;37:735–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kish L. Survey sampling. New York: Wiley; 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tamanini JT, Dambros M, D’Ancona CA, Palma PC, Rodrigues Netto N. [Validation of the “International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire—Short Form” (ICIQ-SF) for Portuguese.] Rev Saude Publica. 2004;38(3):438–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pereira SB, Thiel RRC, Riccetto C, da Silva JM, Pereira LC, Herrmann V, et al. Validação do International Consultation on incontinence questionnaire overactive bladder (ICIQ-OAB) para língua portuguesa. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2010;32(6):273–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heinemann LA, Potthoff P, Schneider HP. International versions of the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:282.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trøndelag. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(11):1150–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Guarisi T, Pinto Neto AM, Osis MJ, Pedro AO, Paiva LH, Faúndes A. Urinary incontinence among climateric Brazilian women: household survey. Rev Saude Publica. 2001;35(5):428–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reigota RB, Pedro AO, de Souza Santos Machado V, Costa-Paiva L, Pinto-Neto AM. Prevalence of urinary incontinence and its association with multimorbidity in women aged 50 years or older: a population-based study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014;35(1):62–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Danforth KN, Townsend MK, Lifford K, Curhan GC, Resnick NM, Grodstein F. Risk factors for urinary incontinence among middle-aged women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(2):339–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Waetjen LE, Ye J, Feng WY, Johnson WO, Greendale GA, Sampselle CM, et al. Association between menopausal transition stages and developing urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(5):989–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Teleman PM, Persson J, Mattiasson A, Samsioe G. The relation between urinary incontinence and steroid hormone levels in perimenopausal women. A report from the Women’s Health in the Lund Area (WHILA) study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(8):927–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hendrix SL, Cochrane BB, Nygaard IE, Handa VL, Barnabei VM, Iglesia C, et al. Effects of estrogen with and without progestin on urinary incontinence. JAMA. 2005;293(8):935–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cody JD, Jacobs ML, Richardson K, Moehrer B, Hextall A. Oestrogen therapy for urinary incontinence in post-menopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 10:CD001405. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001405.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reed SD, Newton KM, LaCroix AZ, Grothaus LC, Grieco VS, Erlich K. Vaginal, endometrial, and reproductive hormone findings: randomized placebo-controlled trial of black cohosh, multibotanical herbs, and dietary soy for vasomotor symptoms: the Herbal Alternatives for Menopause (HALT) Study. Menopause. 2008;15:51–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Findik RB, Unluer AN, Sahin E, Bozkurt OF, Karakaya J, Unsal A. Urinary incontinence in women and Its relation with pregnancy, mode of delivery, connective tissue disease and other factors. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2012;21(2):207–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Faúndes A, Guarisi T, Pinto-Neto AM. The risk of urinary incontinence of parous women who delivered only by cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001;72(1):41–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thom DH, Rortveit G. Prevalence of postpartum urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(12):1511–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kudish BI, Shveiky D, Gutman RE, Jacoby V, Sokol AI, Rodabough R, et al. Hysterectomy and urinary incontinence in postmenopausal women. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(11):1523–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Basak T, Kok G, Guvenc G. Prevalence, risk factors and quality of life in Turkish women with urinary incontinence: a synthesis of the literature. Int Nurs Rev. 2013;60(4):448–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pakgohar M, Sabetghadam S, Vasegh Rahimparvar SF, Kazemnejad A. Quality of life (QoL) and help-seeking in postmenopausal women with urinary incontinence (UI): A population based study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014;59(2):403–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sturdee DW, Panay N. Recommendations for the management of postmenopausal vaginal atrophy. Climacteric. 2010;13(6):509–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rud T. Urethral pressure profile in continent women from childhood to old age. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1980;59(4):331–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cardozo L, Robinson D. Especial considerations in premenopausal and postmenopausal women with symptoms of overactive bladder. Urology. 2002;60(5):64–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Simon JA, Kokot-Kierepa M, Goldstein J, Nappi RE. Vaginal health in the United States: results from the Vaginal Health: Insights, Views & Attitudes survey. Menopause. 2013;20(10):1043–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Castelo-Branco C, Biglia N, Nappi RE, Schwenkhagen A, Palacios S. Characteristics of post-menopausal women with genitourinary syndrome of menopause: implications for vulvovaginal atrophy diagnosis and treatment selection. Maturitas. 2015;30:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Fundação de Apoio a Pesquisa do estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), process number 2011/14526–9.

Prof Aarão Mendes Pinto-Neto is acknowledged (in memoriam) for his contributiion to this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cássia Raquel Teatin Juliato.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Juliato, C.R.T., Baccaro, L.F., Pedro, A.O. et al. Factors associated with urinary incontinence in middle-aged women: a population-based household survey. Int Urogynecol J 28, 423–429 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3139-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3139-9

Keywords

Navigation