Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Epidemiology of mixed, stress, and urgency urinary incontinence in middle-aged/older women: the importance of incontinence history

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Urinary incontinence (UI) is common and the relationship among its subtypes complex. Our objective was to describe the natural history and predictors of the incontinence subtypes stress, urgency, and mixed, in middle-aged and older US women. We tested our hypothesis that UI subtype history predicted future occurrence, evaluating subtype incidence/remission over multiple time points in a stable cohort of women.

Methods

We analyzed longitudinal urinary incontinence data in 10,572 community-dwelling women aged ≥50 in the 2004–2010 Health and Retirement Study. Mixed, stress, and urgency incontinence prevalence (2004, 2006, 2008, 2010) and 2-year cumulative incidence and remissions (2004–2006, 2006–2008, 2008–2010) were estimated. Patient characteristics and incontinence subtype status 2004–2008 were entered into a multivariable, transition model to determine predictors for incontinence subtype occurrence in 2010.

Results

The prevalence of each subtype in this population (median age 63–66) was 2.6–8.9 %. Subtype incidence equaled 2.1–3.5 % and remissions for each varied between 22.3 and 48.7 %. Incontinence subtype incidence predictors included ethnicity/race, age, body mass index, and functional limitations. Compared with white women, black women had decreased odds of incident stress incontinence and Hispanic women had increased odds of stress incontinence remission. The age range 80–90 and severe obesity predicted incident mixed incontinence. Functional limitations predicted mixed and urgency incontinence. The strongest predictor of incontinence subtype was subtype history. The presence of the respective incontinence subtypes in 2004 and 2006 strongly predicted 2010 recurrence (odds ratio [OR] stress incontinence = 30.7, urgency OR = 47.4, mixed OR = 42.1).

Conclusions

Although the number of remissions was high, a previous history of incontinence subtypes predicted recurrence. Incontinence status is dynamic, but tends to recur over the longer term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Landefeld CS, Bowers BJ, Feld AD et al (2008) National institutes of health state-o-the-science conference statement: prevention of fecal and urinary incontinence in adults. Ann Intern Med 148(6):449–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kannan H, Radican L, Turpin RS et al (2009) Burden of illness associated with lower urinary tract symptoms including overactive bladder/urinary incontinence. Urology 74:34–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hu TW, Wagner TH, Bentkover JD et al (2004) Costs of urinary incontinence and overactive bladder in the United States: a comparative study. Urology 63:461–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL et al (2008) Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 300(11):1311–1316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Thom DH, Brown JS, Schembri M et al (2010) Incidence and risk factors for change in urinary incontinence status in a prospective cohort of middle-aged and older women: the reproductive risk of incontinence study in Kaiser. J Urol 184:1394–1401

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Nygaard IE, Lemke JH (1996) Urinary incontinence in rural older women: prevalence, incidence and remission. J Am Geriatr Soc 44(9):1049–1054

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lifford KL, Townsend MK, Curhan GC et al (2008) The epidemiology of urinary incontinence in older women: incidence, progression, and remission. J Am Geriatr Soc 56(7):1191–1198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Irwin DE, Milsom I, Chancellor MB et al (2010) Dynamic progression of overactive bladder and urinary incontinence symptoms: a systematic review. Eur Urol 58:532–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. The older population (2010) Issued November 2011. Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-09.pdf. Retrieved 6 November 2014

  10. Milsom I, Altman D, Lapitan M et al (2009) Epidemiology of urinary incontinence (UI) and faecal incontinence (FI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S et al (eds) Incontinence, 4th edn. Health Publications, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  11. Herzog AR, Diokno AC, Brown MB et al (1990) Two-year incidence, remission, and change patterns of urinary incontinence in noninstitutionalized older adults. J Gerontol 45(2):M67–M74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hartmann KE, McPheeter ML, Biller DH et al (2009) Treatment of overactive bladder in women. Evid Rep Technol Assess 187:1–120

    Google Scholar 

  13. Health and Retirement Study, Data products (CORE files 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010 and Cross Wave: Tracker 2010 file0 public use dataset. Produced and distributed by the University of Michigan with funding from the National Institute on Aging (grant number NIA U01AG009740). Ann Arbor, MI, (2004–2010). Available at: http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu. Accessed 2 May 2014

  14. Komesu YM, Rogers RG, Schrader RM et al (2009) Incidence and remission of urinary incontinence in a community-based population of women ≥50 years. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(5):581–589

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Diggle PJ, Heagerty P, Liang K-Y et al (2009) Transition models. In: Analysis of longitudinal data, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 190–207

  16. Sampling weights revised for Tracker 2.0 and beyond. Available at: http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/sitedocs/wghtdoc.pdf and updates to HRS sample weights. Available at: http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/sitedocs/userg/dr-013.pdf

  17. Waetjen LE, Liao S, Johnson WO et al (2006) Factors associated with prevalent and incident urinary incontinence in a cohort of midlife women: a longitudinal analysis of data. Study of women’s health across the nation. Am J Epidemiol 165(3):309–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jackson SL, Scholes D, Boyko EJ et al (2006) Predictors of urinary incontinence in a prospective cohort of postmenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol 108:855–862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Townsend MK, Danforth KN, Rosner B et al (2007) Body mass index, weight gain, and incident urinary incontinence in middle-aged women. Obstet Gynecol 110:346–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Minassian VA, Devore E, Hagan K et al (2013) Severity of urinary incontinence and effect on quality of life in women by incontinence type. Obstet Gynecol 121:1083–1090

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hunskaar S, Lose G, Sykes D et al (2004) The prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in four European countries. Br J Urol Int 93:324–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Reynolds WS, Dmochowski RR, Penson DF (2011) Epidemiology of stress urinary incontinence in women. Curr Urol Rep 12:370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shamliyan T, Wyman J, Kane RL. Nonsurgical treatments for urinary incontinence in adult women: diagnosis and comparative effectiveness. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 36. (Prepared by the University of Minnesota evidence-based practice Center under Contract No. HHSA 290-2007-10064-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 11(12)-EHC074-EF. Rockville, MD. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. April 2012. Available at: www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm

Download references

Funding

The Health and Retirement Study, data products (CORE files 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010 and Cross Wave: Tracker 2010 file public use dataset). Produced and distributed by the University of Michigan with funding from the National Institute on Aging (grant number NIA U01AG009740). Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. The current research was also supported by the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health through grant number 8UL1TR000041, The University of New Mexico Clinical and Translational Science Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuko M. Komesu.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Y.M. Komesu: Co-PI for “Brain Centered Therapy versus Medication for Urgency Urinary Incontinence—An RCT,” grant number 5R-01AT007171-03, NIH PA-10-067, funding source: NIH (primary: NCCIH); R. Schrader: Co-Investigator grant number 5R-01AT007171-03 (see above); L.H. Ketai: Co-PI grant number 5R-01AT007171-03 (see above); R.R. Rogers: Co-Investigator grant number 5R-01AT007171-03 (see above), Up-to-Date and McGraw-Hill royalties, Associate Editor IUJ, Editorial Board Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery and Obstetrics & Gynecology, DSMB Chair Transform Trial, ABOG Subspecialty Board Member; G.C. Dunivan: Liberate Site PI, American Urogynecologic Society Education Committee.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 15 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Komesu, Y.M., Schrader, R.M., Ketai, L.H. et al. Epidemiology of mixed, stress, and urgency urinary incontinence in middle-aged/older women: the importance of incontinence history. Int Urogynecol J 27, 763–772 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2888-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2888-1

Keywords

Navigation