Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Single-incision sling compared with transobturator sling for treating stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

We tested the hypothesis that the single-incision sling, TVT-Secur (TVT-S), placed in U position is not inferior to transobturator midurethral sling (TVT-O) for treating stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Methods

This was a noninferiority, prospective, randomized controlled trial in which women with SUI, confirmed by physical and urodynamic evaluation, were randomly assigned to receive either TVT-O (n = 56) or TVT-S (n = 66). Exclusion criteria were voiding dysfunction, detrusor overactivity (DO), and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) beyond the hymen. The primary outcomes were objective and subjective cure rates, which were assessed at the 12-month follow-up visit, defined as negative stress, pad, and urodynamic tests and absence of self-reported SUI symptoms. Secondary outcomes were quality of life (QoL) by King’s Health Questionnaire (KHQ) validated for Portuguese language, postoperative pain, and complication rate. The power of the study was 80 % to test the hypothesis that TVT-S is not inferior to TVT-O by >15 %. Statistical significance was fixed at 5 % (p < 0.05).

Results

Groups were similar regarding demographic and clinical preoperative parameters. Objective cure rates for TVT-S and TVT-O groups were 84.1 % vs 87 % [90 % confidence interbal (CI) −15 to 9.8], and subjective cure rates were 92.1 % vs 90.7 % (95 % CI −11.4 to 6.7), respectively. TVT-S resulted in less postoperative general and thigh pain (p < 0.001). A few, but not statistically significant different complications, were observed in both groups: vaginal mucosa perforation, urinary retention, urinary infection, tape exposure, and de novo urgency. There was a significant improvement in all KHQ domains in both groups (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

TVT-S was not inferior to TVT-O for treating SUI at 12-month follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fong ED, Nitti VW (2010) Review article: mid-urethral synthetic slings for female stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 106(5):596–608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ogah J, Cody DJ, Rogerson L (2011) Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women: a short version cochrane review. Neurourol Urodyn 30:284–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Neumam M (2007) TVT-obturator: short-term data on an operative procedure for the cure of female stress urinary incontinence performed on 300 patients. Eur Urol 51:1083–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Neuman M (2008) Perioperative complications and early follow-pu with 100 TVT-SECUR procederes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15:480–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Debodiance P, Lagrange E, Amblard J, Lenoble C, Lucot JP, Villet R, Jacquetin B (2008) TVT secur: more and more minimal invasive. Preliminary prospective study on 110 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 37:229–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sola V, Ricci P, Pardo J (2009) Third generation sub-mid uretral mesh:expirience with 110 TVT-S. Arch Esp Urol 62(5):376–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tommaselli GA, Di Carlo C, Gargano V, Formisano C, Scala M, Nappi C (2010) Efficacy and safety of TVT-O and TVT-Secur in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J 21(10):1211–1217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hinoul P, Vervest H, Boon J, Venema P (2011) A randomized, controlled trial comparing an innovative single-incision sling with an established transobturator sling to treat female stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 185:1356–1362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang Y, Li F, Wang Q, Yang S, Cai X, Chen Y (2011) Comparison of three mid-urethral tension-free tapes (TVT, TVT-O, and TVT-Secur) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J 22:1369–1374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cornu JN, Sèbe P, Peyrat L, Ciofu C, Cussenot O, Haab F (2010) Misterm prospective evaluation of TVT-Secur reveals high failure rate. Eur Urol 58:157–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hahn I, Fall M (1991) Objective quantification of stress urinary incontinence: a short reproducible, provocative pad-test. Neurourol Urodyn 10:475–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fonseca ESM, Camargo ALM, Castro RA, Sartori MGF, Fonseca MCM, Lima GR, Girão MJBC (2005) Validação do questiomário de qualidade de vida (King’s Health Questionnarie) em mulheres brasileiras com incontinência urinária. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 27:235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. de Leval J (2003) Novel surgical technique for treatment of the female stress urinary incontinence: transobturator vaginal tape inside-out. Eur Urol 44:724–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee KS, Lee YS, Seo JT, Na YG, Choo MS, Kim JC, Seo JH, Yoon JM, Lee JG, Kim DY, Yoo ES, Min KS, Hong JY, Lee JZ (2010) A prospective multicenter randomized comparative study between the U- and H-type methods of the TVT SECUR procedure for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up. Eur Urol 57:973–979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Staat M, Trenz E, Lohmann P, Frotscher R, Klinge U, Tabaza R, Kirschner-Hermanns R (2012) New measurements to compare soft tissue anchoring systems in pelvic floor surgery. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 100(4):924–933

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim JJ, Lee YS, Lee KS (2010) Randomized comparative study of the U- and H-type approaches of the TVT-secur procedure for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: one-year follow-up. Korean J Urol 51:250–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Oliveira R, Silva C, Dinis P, Cruz F (2011) Suburethral single incision slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. What is the evidence for using them in 2010? Arch Esp Urol 64(4):339–346

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bernasconi F, Napolitano V, Natale F, Leone V, Lijoi D, Cervigni M (2012) TVT SECUR System: final results of a prospective, observational, multicentric study. Int Urogynecol J 23(1):93–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Walsh CA (2011) TVT-Secur mini-sling for stress urinary incontinence: a review of outcomes at 12 months. BJU Int 108:652–657

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Larsson PG, Teleman P, Persson J (2010) A serious bleeding complication with injury of the corona mortis with the TVT-Secur procedure. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21:1175–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Masata J, Martan A, Svabik K (2008) Severe bleeding from internal obturator muscle following tension-free tape Secur hammock approach procedure. Int Urogynecol J 19:1581–1583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Araco F, Gravante G, Sesti F, Piccione E (2009) Tension-free vaginal tape Secur hammock procedure: two additional cases of intraoperative bleeding. Int Urogynecol J 20:125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Palva K, Nilsson CG (2011) Prevalence of urinary urgency symptoms decreases by mid-urethral sling procedures for treatment of stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 22:1241–1247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Barber MD, Weidner AC, Sokol AI, Amundsen CL, Jelovsek JE, Karram MM, Ellerkmann M, Rardin CR, Iglesia CB, Toglia M (2012) Single-incision mini-sling compared with tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 119(2, Part 1):328–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Abdel-Fattah M, Ford JA, Lim CP, Madhuvrata P (2011) Single-incision mini-slings versus standard midurethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. Eur Urol 60:468–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Collins SL, Andrew-Moore R, MacQuay HJ (1997) The visual analog pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimeters? Pain 72:95–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Latthe PM, Singh P, Foon R, Toozs-Hobson P (2010) Two routes of transobturator tape procedures in stress urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis with direct and indirect comparison of randomized trials. BJU Int 106:68–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Maria H. M. Bianchi-Ferraro.

Additional information

Registration: Clinical Trials.gov Protocol Registration System, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT 01095159, TVTO™ X TVTS ™ for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence

Funded by Federal University of São Paulo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bianchi-Ferraro, A.M.H.M., Jarmy-Di Bella, Z.I.K., Castro, R.d.A. et al. Single-incision sling compared with transobturator sling for treating stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J 24, 1459–1465 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1998-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1998-2

Keywords

Navigation