Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
We describe differences in sexual activity and function in women with and without pelvic floor disorders (PFDs).
Methods
Heterosexual women ≥40 years of age who presented to either urogynecology or general gynecology clinics at 11 clinical sites were recruited. Women were asked if they were sexually active with a male partner. Validated questionnaires and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) examinations assessed urinary incontinence (UI), fecal incontinence (FI), and/or pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Sexual activity and function was measured by the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Student’s t test was used to assess continuous variables; categorical variables were assessed with Fisher’s exact test and logistic regression. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the impact of pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) on FSFI total and domain scores.
Results
Five hundred and five women met eligibility requirements and gave consent for participation. Women with and without PFDs did not differ in race, body mass index (BMI), comorbid medical conditions, or hormone use. Women with PFDs were slightly older than women without PFDs (55.6 + 10.8 vs. 51.6 + 8.3 years, P <0.001); all analyses were controlled for age. Women with PFDs were as likely to be sexually active as women without PFDs (61.6 vs. 75.5 %, P = 0.09). There was no difference in total FSFI scores between cohorts (23.2 + 8.5 vs. 24.4 + 9.2, P = 0.23) or FSFI domain scores (all P = NS).
Conclusion
Rates of sexual activity and function are not different between women with and without PFDs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Defining Sexual health: report of a technical consultation on sexual health, 28–31; January 2002, Geneva. World Health Organization, 2006
Rogers RG, Villarreal A, Kammerer-Doak D, Qualls C (2001) Sexual function in women with and without urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 12(6):361–365
Handa VL, Harvey L, Cundiff GW et al (2004) Sexual function among women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(3):751–756
Handa VL, Cundiff G, Chang HH, Helzlsouer KJ (2008) Female sexual function and pelvic floor disorders. Obstet Gynecol 111(5):1045–1052
Barber MD, Visco AG, Wyman JF et al (2002) Sexual function in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 99(2):281–289
Hanley J, Capewell S, Hagen S et al (2001) Validity study of the severity index, a simple measure of urinary incontinence in women. Br Med J 322:1096–1097
Jorge J, Wexner S (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97
Rockwood T, Church J, Fleshman JW et al (1999) Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1525–1531
Bump RC, Mattiason A, Bo K et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17
Hall A, Theofrastous J, Cundiff G et al (1996) Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of the proposed International Continence Society of Gynecologic Surgeons and American Urogynecological Society pelvic organ prolapse quantification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1467–1470
Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J et al (2000) The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 26(2):191–208
Swift SE (2000) The distribution of pelvic organ polapse in a population of women presenting for routine gynecologic healthcare. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:277–285
Boreham MK, Richter H, Kenton K et al (2005) Anal incontinence in women presenting for gynecologic care: prevalence, risk factors, and impact upon quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192(5):1637–1642
Novi JM, Jeronis S, Morgan MA, Arya LA (2005) Sexual function in women with pelvic organ prolapse compared to women without pelvic organ prolapse. J Urol 173(5):1669–1672
Waetjen LE, Subak LL, Shen H et al (2003) Stress urinary incontinence surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 101(4):p671–p676
Weber AM, Walters MD, Schover LR, Mitchinson A (1995) Sexual function in women with uterovaginal prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 85:483–487
Acknowledgments
This work is supported in part by the Society of Gynecologic Surgeon’s Research Committee (Fellows Pelvic Research Network) and the DHHS/NIH/NCRR/GCRC Grant #5M01 RR 00997
Conflicts of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Additional information
Financial support: sponsored in part by the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Research Committee (Fellows’ Pelvic Research Network) a and the DHHS/NIH/NCRR/GCRC Grant #5M01 RR 00997 ( for use of the Biostatistician at the University of New Mexico HSC).
Recruitment sites: Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA; Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.; Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY and SUNY-Downstate, Brooklyn, NY, USA; Urogynecology Specialists, Louisville, KY, USA; Cleveland Clinic, Weston, FL USA; Women’s Continence Center of Greater Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA; Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Megan O. Schimpf and Cedric K. Olivera were each affiliated with two sites during recruitment.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fashokun, T.B.O., Harvie, H.S., Schimpf, M.O. et al. Sexual activity and function in women with and without pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogynecol J 24, 91–97 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1848-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1848-2