Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Risks, symptoms, and management of pelvic nerve damage secondary to surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a report of 95 cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

This study aims to report pelvic nerve damage secondary to surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and the role of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of such nerve damage.

Methods

Ninety-five consecutive patients complaining of pain and/or bladder or bowel dysfunction following surgery for pelvic prolapse underwent laparoscopic exploration for pelvic neuropathy.

Results

A mean reduction in visual analog score (VAS) from 8.9 (±0.96; 6–10) preoperatively to 2.9 (±2.77; 0–6) at 1-year follow-up was obtained in patients after laparoscopic nerve decompression (n = 90; p < 0.001). Success, defined as a reduction in VAS score of greater than 50%, was obtained in 84% of patients. Sixty-five patients (68%) discontinued the regular use of analgesics.

Conclusions

Because secondary nerve damage can appear months or years after the primary procedure, long-term follow-up is mandatory and should focus on nerve damage as well as anatomical and functional outcomes. Laparoscopy is a unique method for etiologic diagnosis and neurosurgical treatment of such nerve lesions through decompression or implantation of an electrode for neuromodulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Verdeja AM, Elkins TE, Odoi A, Gasser R, Lamoutte C (1995) Transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy: anatomic landmarks to be aware of to minimize complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:1468–1469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Debodinance P, Amblard J, Fatton B, Cosson M, Jacquetin B (2007) The prosthetic kits in the prolapsed surgery: is it a gadget? J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 36(3):267–275

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Possover M (2009) Laparoscopic management of endopelvic etiologies of pudendal pain in 134 consecutive patients. J Urol 181:1732–1736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Possover M (2010) New surgical evolutions in management of sacral radiculopathies. Surg Technol Int 19:123–128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Possover M, Rhiem K, Chiantera V (2004) The “laparoscopic neuro-navigation”—LANN: from a functional cartography of the pelvic autonomous neurosystem to a new field of laparoscopic surgery. Min Invas Ther & Allied Technol 13:362–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Possover M (2004) Laparoscopic exposure and electrostimulation of the somatic and autonomous pelvic nerves: a new method for implantation of neuroprothesis in paralysed patients? J Gynecol Surg Endosc Imaging Allied Tech 1:87–90

    Google Scholar 

  7. Possover M, Baekelandt J, Chiantera V (2007) Anatomy of the sacral roots and the pelvic splanchnic nerves in women using the LANN technique. Surg Lap Endosc Percutan Tech 17(6):508–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Possover M, Schneider T, Henle KP (2010) Laparoscopic therapy of endometriosis and vascular entrapment of sacral plexus. Fert Steril 95:756–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Possover M, Baekelandt J, Chiantera V (2007) The laparoscopic implantation of neuroprothesis—LION technique—to control intractable abdomino-pelvic neuralgia. Neuromodulation 10:18–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Possover M, Baekelandt J, Chiantera V (2007) The laparoscopic approach to control intractable pelvic neuralgia: from laparoscopic pelvic neurosurgery to the LION technique. Clin J Pain 23:821–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Possover M (2009) Laparoscopic management of neural pelvic pain in women secondary to pelvic surgery. Fertil Steril 91:2720–2725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shiozawa T, Huebner M, Hirt B, Wallwiener D, Reisenauer C (2010) Nerve-preserving sacrocolpopexy: anatomical study and surgical approach. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 152(1):103–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamilton Boyles S, Edwards R, Gregory W, Clark A (2007) Complications associated with transobturator sling procedures. Int Urogynecol J 18:19–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Flynn MK, Weidner AC, Amundsen CL (2006) Sensory nerve injury after uterosacral ligament suspension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:1869–1872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wieslander CK, Roshanravan SM, Wai CY, Schaffer JI, Corton MM (2007) Uterosacral ligament suspension sutures: anatomic relationships in unembalmed female cadavers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197(6):672.e1–672.e6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Deffieux X, Desseaux K, de Tayrac R, Faivre E, Frydman R, Fernandez H (2009) Infracoccygeal sacropexy for uterovaginal prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 104(1):56–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bjelic-Radisic V, Hartmann G, Abendstein B, Tamussimo K, Riss P (2006) Posterior intravaginal slingplasty (IVS) for prolapse [IUGA abstract 334]. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17(suppl 2):S243

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgical Gynecology & Neuropelveology, Hirslanden Clinic, Witellikerstrasse 40, 8032, Zürich, Switzerland

    Marc Possover

  2. Department of Gynecology, Federal University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    Nucelio Lemos

Authors
  1. Marc Possover
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nucelio Lemos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Possover.

Additional information

A related editorial can be found at doi:10.1007/s00192-011-1570-5 and related articles at doi:10.1007/s00192-011-1447-7 and doi:10.1007/s00192-011-1485-1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Possover, M., Lemos, N. Risks, symptoms, and management of pelvic nerve damage secondary to surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a report of 95 cases. Int Urogynecol J 22, 1485–1490 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1539-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1539-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation