Abstract
The risk of persistent pain following a retropubic sling is rare (1%). Nerve injuries have been suspected as a cause of persistent postoperative pain. We present two cases of postoperative pain thought to be secondary to injury or mechanical distortion of two different pelvic nerves. Visual exam, cystoscopy, and MRI studies demonstrated no abnormal findings. Manual examination produced site-specific tenderness thought to be associated with a specific nerve distribution. Each patient’s pain was first relieved with a local anesthetic block at the site of the pain. One patient required surgical excision of the mesh, and the second patient only required conservative management. Both patients’ pain completely resolved. Based on these and other reported cases, along with cadaveric dissections, we hypothesize that retropubic slings can potentially injure the pudendal, ilioinguinal, and iliohypogastric nerve branches.
References
Ulmsten U, Petros P (1995) Intravaginal slingplasty (IVS): an ambulatory surgical procedure for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Scan J Urol Nephrol 29:75–82
Bourrat M, Armand C, Seffert P, Tostain J (2003) Complications and medium-term functional results of TVT in stress incontinence. Prog Urol 13(6):1358–1364
Duckett JR, Jain S (2005) Groin pain after a tension-free vaginal tape or similar suburethral sling: management strategies. BJU Int 95:95–97
Vervest HA, Bongers MY, van der Wurff (2006) Nerve injury: an exceptional cause of pain after TVT. Int Urogynecol J 17:665–667
Misrai V, Roupret M, Xylinas E, Cour F et al (2009) Surgical resection for suburethral sling complications after treatment for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 181(5):2198–2202
Conflicts of interest
Peter Lotze is a consultant for Boston Scientific.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fisher, H.W., Lotze, P.M. Nerve injury locations during retropubic sling procedures. Int Urogynecol J 22, 439–441 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1298-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1298-7