Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term results of intravesical hyaluronan therapy in bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

While the short-term efficacy of intravesical hyaluronan for bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis (BPS/IC) has been demonstrated, no data exist on the long-term outcome of this therapy.

Methods

Seventy BPS/IC patients treated with intravesical hyaluronan therapy from 2001 to 2003 were asked to rate their present status of bladder symptoms on a visual analog scale.

Results

Forty-eight of 70 patients responded after a mean follow-up of 4.9 years. The average initial VAS score of 8.15 had been reduced to 2.71 after therapy and further to 2.14 5 years later. Fifty percent of patients (24/48) reported complete bladder symptom remission at 5 years follow-up without any additional therapy; 41.7% (20/48) with symptom recurrence was improved with hyaluronan maintenance therapy. No improvement was reported by four patients.

Conclusions

Besides a high rate of acute symptom remission, intravesical hyaluronan also shows long-term efficacy in a considerable number of BPS/IC patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Toft BR, Nordling J (2006) Recent developments of intravesical therapy of painful bladder syndrome/interstitial cystitis: a review. Curr Opin Urol 16:268–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Morales A, Emerson L, Nickel JC, Lundie M (1996) Intravesical hyaluronic acid in the treatment of refractory interstitial cystitis. J Urol 156:45–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fall M, Oberpenning F, Peeker R (2008) Treatment of bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis 2008: can we make evidence-based decisions? Eur Urol 54:65–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Porru D, Campus G, Tudino D, Valdes E, Vespa A, Scarpa RM, Usai E (1997) Results of treatment of refractory interstitial cystitis with intravesical hyaluronic acid. Urol Int 59:26–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bade JJ, Laseur M, Nieuwenburg A, van der Weele LT, Mensink HJ (1997) A placebo controlled study of intravesical pentosanpolysulfate for the treatment of interstitial cystitis. Br J Urol 79:168–171

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Parsons CL, Housley T, Schmidt JD, Lebow D (1994) Treatment of interstitial cystitis with intravesical heparin. Br J Urol 73:504–507

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Steinhoff G, Ittah B, Rowan S (2002) The efficacy of chondroitin sulfate 0.2% in treating interstitial cystitis. Can J Urol 9:1454–1458

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nickel JC, Egerdie B, Downey J, Singh R, Skehan A, Carr L, Irvine-Bird K (2009) A real-life multicentre clinical practice study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravesical chondroitin sulphate for the treatment of interstitial cystitis. BJU Int 103(1):56–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Riedl CR, Engelhardt PF, Daha KL, Morakis N, Pflüger H (2008) Hyaluronan treatment of interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome. Int Urogyneocol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(5):717–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kallestrup EB, Steinunn S, Jørgense S, Nordling J, Hald T (2005) Treatment of interstitial cystitis with Cystistat®: a hyaluronic acid product. Scand J Urol Nephrol 39:143–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Daha LK, Riedl CR, Hohlbrugger G, Knoll M, Engelhardt PF, Pfluger H (2003) Comparative assessment of maximal bladder capacity, 0.9% NaCL versus 0.2M KCl, for the diagnosis of interstitial cystitis: a prospective controlled study. J Urol 170:807–809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hurst RE (1994) Structure, function, and pathology of proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans in the urinary tract. World J Urol 12:3–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Leppilahti M, Hellström P, Tammela TLJ (2002) Effect of diagnostic hydrodistension and four intravesical Hyaluronan Instillations on bladder ICAM-1 intensity and association of ICAM-1 intensity with clinical response in patients with interstitial cystitis. Urology 60:46–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schulz A, Vestweber AM, Dressler D (2009) Anti-inflammatory action of a hyaluronic acid-chondroitin sulphate preparation in an in vitro bladder model. Akt Urol 40(2):109–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Parsons CL, Forrest J, CJ CJ, the Elmiron Study Group (2002) Effect of pentosan polysulfate therapy on intravesical potassium sensitivity. Urology 59:329–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gupta SK, Pidcock L, Parr NJ (2005) The potassium sensitivity test: a predictor of treatment response in interstitial cystitis. BJU Int 96:1063–1066

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Teichman JM, Nielsen-Omeis BJ (1999) Potassium leak test predicts outcome in interstitial cystitis. J Urol 161:1791–1796

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Daha L, Riedl CR, Lazar D, Simak R, Pflüger H (2008) Effect of intravesical glycosaminoglycan substitution therapy on bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis, bladder capacity and potassium sensitivity. Scand J Urol 42(4):369–372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

Claus R. Riedl is the principal investigator for controlled study on Hyaluronan in BPS/IC (CISTIC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul F. Engelhardt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Engelhardt, P.F., Morakis, N., Daha, L.K. et al. Long-term results of intravesical hyaluronan therapy in bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis. Int Urogynecol J 22, 401–405 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1294-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1294-y

Keywords

Navigation