Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Procedural techniques in sacral nerve modulation

  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sacral neuromodulation involves a staged process, including a screening trial and delayed formal implantation for those with substantial improvement. The advent of the tined lead has revolutionized the technology, allowing for a minimally invasive outpatient procedure to be performed under intravenous sedation. With the addition of fluoroscopy to the bilateral percutaneous nerve evaluation, there has been marked improvement in the placement of these temporary leads. Thus, the screening evaluation is now a better reflection of possible permanent improvement. Both methods of screening have advantages and disadvantages. Selection of a particular procedure should be tailored to individual patient characteristics. Subsequent implantation of the internal pulse generator (IPG) or explantation of an unsuccessful staged lead is straightforward outpatient procedure, providing minimal additional risk for the patient. Future refinement to the procedure may involve the introduction of a rechargeable battery, eliminating the need for IPG replacement at the end of the battery life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stewart WR (2001) Prevalence and impact of OAB in the US: results from the NOBLE program. Neurol Urodynam 20:406–408

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tanagho EA, Schmidt RA (1988) Electrical stimulation in the clinical management of the neurogenic bladder. J Urol 140:1331–1339

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bullock TL, Siegel SW (2010) Sacral neuromodulation for voiding dysfunction. In: Statskin D (ed) Atlas of bladder disease. Springer, Philadelphia, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  4. Siegel SW (1992) Management of voiding dysfunction with an implantable neuroprosthesis. Urol Clin NA 19:163–170

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Spinelli M, Giardiello G, Gerber M, Arduini A, van den Hombergh U, Malaguti S (2003) New sacral neuromodulation lead for percutaneous implantation using local anesthesia: description and first experience. J Urol 170:1905–1907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN for their contribution in this paper.

Conflicts of interest

E.R. Williams is a consultant of AMS. S.W.E. Siegel is an investigator and consultant/advisor for Uroplasty; a consultant/advisor for QIG; an investigator at Boston Scientific; a board member, officer, and trustee at the North Central Section AUA; an investigator and consultant/advisor for Allergan; a consultant/advisor for Bard Urological; is involved in a scientific trial at Uromedica; a board member, officer, and trustee at SUFU; an investigator and consultant/advisor and part of the scientific trial at AMS; an investigator and consultant/advisor and is part of the scientific trial at Medtronic; and a consultant/advisor for GT Medical.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth R. Williams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, E.R., Siegel, S.W. Procedural techniques in sacral nerve modulation. Int Urogynecol J 21 (Suppl 2), 453–460 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1280-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1280-4

Keywords

Navigation