Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Body image in women before and after reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

This study seeks to determine the impact of prolapse surgery on body image in women with pelvic organ prolapse.

Methods

Case-control study of 76 sexually active women with greater than or equal to stage II prolapse planning reconstructive surgery and 67 women with lesser than or equal to stage I prolapse. Questionnaires/examinations were completed at baseline and 6 months postoperatively for cases and at baseline for controls: Body Exposure During Sexual Activity Questionnaire (BESAQ), Body Image Quality of Life Inventory (BIQLI), Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI)/Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ), and Pelvic Organ Prolapse–Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire-12 (PISQ-12), and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ) examination.

Results

Baseline and 6-month data were available for 64 case women with mean age of 60 ± 8 years, mean body mass index of 28 ± 5 kg/m2, 96% Caucasian, and 83% postmenopausal. Baseline POPQ stage distribution was: stage II 14%, stage III 78%, and stage IV 8%. BESAQ, BIQLI, PFDI/PFIQ, and PISQ-12 postoperative scores significantly improved compared to preoperatively (all p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusions

Body image, sexual function, and pelvic floor symptoms improve after prolapse surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P et al (1999) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic organ dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:299–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rogers GR, Villarreal A, Kammerer-Doak D, Qualls C (2001) Sexual function in women with and without urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 12:361–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown JS, Posner SF, Stewart AL (1999) Urge incontinence: new health-related quality of life measures. JAGS 47(8):980–988

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barber MD, Kuchibhatla MN, Pieper CF, Bump RC (2001) Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185(6):1388–1395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cash TF, Pruzinsky T (eds) (2002) Body image: a handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sarwer DB, Pruzinksy T, Cash TF, Goldwyn RM, Persing JA, Whitaker LA (eds) (2006) Psychological aspects of reconstructive and cosmetic plastic surgery: clinical, empirical, and ethical perspective. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Publishers, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bolton MA, Pruzinsky T, Cash TF, Persing JA (2003) Measuring outcomes in plastic surgery: body image and quality of life in abdominoplasty patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 112(2):619–625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kelly RE, Cash TF et al (2008) Surgical repair of pectus excavatum markedly improves body image and perceived ability for physical activity: A multicenter study. Pediatrics 122:1218–1222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jelosevek JE, Barber MD (2006) Women seeking treatment for advanced pelvic organ prolapse have decreased body image and quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194(5):1455–1461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cash TF, Maikkula CL, Yamamiya Y (2004) Baring the body in the bedroom: body image, sexual self-schemas, and sexual functioning among college women and men. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality 7: http://www.ejhs.org/volume7/bodyimage.html

  11. Cash TF, Fleming EC (2002) The impact of body image experiences: development of the body image quality of life inventory. Int J of Eating Disorders 31:455–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cash TF, Jakatdar TA, Williams EF (2004) The body image quality of life inventory: further validation with college men and women. Body Image: An International Journal of Research 1:279–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C (2003) A short form of the pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire (PISQ-12).[erratum appears in Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004 May–Jun;15(3):219]. Int Urogynecol J 14:164–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Spitzer RL, Kroneke K, Williams JA (1999) Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD. JAMA 282(18):1737–1744

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JOL, Klarskov P et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Little RJA, Rubin DB (1987) Statistical analysis with missing data. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shrive FM, Stuart H, Quan H, Ghali WA (2006) Dealing with missing data in a multi-question depression scale: a comparison of imputation methods. BMC Medical Research Methodology 6:57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jacob Cohen (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (second ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

  19. Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112:155–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sarwer DB, Wadden TA, Whitaker LA (2002) An investigation of changes in body image following cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(1):363–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sarwer DB, Wadden TA, Pertschuk MJ, Whiatker LA (1998) The psychology of cosmetic surgery: a review and reconceptualization. Clin Psychol Rev 18:1–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Heit M, Rosenquist C, Culligan P, Graham C, Murphy M, Shott S (2003) Predicting treatment choice for patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 101:1279–1284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ghetti C, Gregory T, Edwards R, Otto L, Clark A (2005) Pelvic organ descent and symptoms of pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(1):53–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Barber MD, Wlaters MD, Cundiff GW (2006) Responsiveness of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) in women undergoing vaginal surgery and pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194:1492–1498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rogers RG, Kammerer-Doak D, Darrow A, Murray K, Qualls C, Olsen A, Barber M (2006) Does sexual function change after surgery for stress urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse? A multicenter prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195(5):e1–e4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to acknowledge and thank Marijane Krohn, PhD for her statistical support and review of this paper.

Financial acknowledgments

Irene McLenahan Young Investigator’s Research Award, Magee-Womens Research Institute and the American Urogynecology Society Foundation-Astellas Research Award 1.

Conflicts of interest

None

Reprints

Not available from the author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerry L. Lowder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lowder, J.L., Ghetti, C., Moalli, P. et al. Body image in women before and after reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 21, 919–925 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1141-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1141-1

Keywords

Navigation