Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vaginal weight cone versus assisted pelvic floor muscle training in the treatment of female urinary incontinence. A prospective, single-blind, randomized trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Vaginal weight cone (VWC) versus assisted pelvic floor muscle training (APFMT) in the treatment of urinary incontinence (UI) in women.

Methods

One hundred three incontinent women were randomly distributed into two groups: group G1 (n = 51) treated with VWC and G2 (n = 52), APFMT. The following parameters were performed initially and after treatment: (1) clinical questionnaire, (2) visual analogue scale (VAS), (3) 60-min pad test, and (4) subjective and objective assessment of pelvic floor muscle (PFM).

Results

There was a significant decrease in nocturia and urine loss after treatment in both groups (p < 0.05). In VAS, there was a significant improvement of all parameters in both groups (p < 0.05). The pad test showed significant decrease in both groups (p < 0.05). There was a significant increase of PFM strength in both groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

There was no difference between groups treated with VWC and APFMT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

VWC:

Vaginal weight cone

APFMT:

Assisted pelvic floor muscle training

UI:

Urinary incontinence

G1:

Group 1

G2:

Group 2

VAS:

Visual analogue scale

PFM:

Pelvic floor muscles

PFMT:

Pelvic floor muscles training

SUI:

Stress urinary incontinence

T0:

Before the treatment

T6:

Six months after treatment

T12:

Twelve months after treatment

TDP:

Transvaginal digital palpation

g:

Gram

min:

Minutes

References

  1. Holley RL, Varner RE, Kerns DJ, Mestecky PJ (1995) Long-term failure of pelvic floor musculature exercises in treatment of genuine stress incontinence. South Med J 165:322–329

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arvonen T, Fianu-Jonasson A, Tyni-Lenné R (2001) Effectiveness of two conservative modes of physical therapy in women with urinary stress incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 20:591–599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hay-Smith EJ, Dumoulin C (2006) Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 25:CD005654

    Google Scholar 

  4. Peattie AB, Plevnik S, Stanton SL (1988) Vaginal cones: a conservative method of treating genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynecol 95:1049–1053

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Plevnik S (1994) Vaginal cones. In: Shussler B, Laycock J, Norton P, Stanton SL (eds) Pelvic floor re-education principles and practice. Springer, London, pp 139–142

    Google Scholar 

  6. Herbison GP, Dean N (2002) Weighted vaginal cones for urinary incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD002114. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002114

  7. Jonasson A, Larsson B, Pschera H (1989) Testing and training of the pelvic floor muscles after childbirth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 68:301–304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bo K, Talseth T, Holme I (1999) Single blind, randomized controlled trial of pelvic floor exercises, electrical stimulation, vaginal cones, and no treatment in management of genuine stress incontinence in women. Br Med J 318:487–493

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Halbe HW (1993) Tratado de Ginecologia Roca. São Paulo

  10. Amaro JL, Moreira ECH, Gameiro MO, Padovani CR (2005) Pelvic floor muscle evaluation in incontinent patients. Int Urogynecol J 16:352–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Laycock J, Green RJ (1988) Interferential therapy in the treatment of incontinence. Phisiotherapy 74:161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goodman LA (1965) On simultaneous confidence intervals for multinomial proportions. Technometrics 7:47–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson RA, Wichern DW (2002) Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 5th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, p 767

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cammu H, Van Nylen M (1998) Pelvic floor exercises versus vaginal weight cones in genuine stress incontinence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 77:89–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Amaro JL, Gameiro MO, Padovani CR (2003) Treatment of urinary stress incontinence by intravaginal electrical stimulation and pelvic floor physiotherapy. Int Urogynecol J 14:204–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wrigley T (1995) The effect of training with vaginal weighted cones and pelvic floor exercises on the strengh of the pelvic floor muscles: a pilot study. Int Urogynecol J 6:4–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Deindl FM, Schüssler B, Vodusek DB, Hesse U (1995) Neurophysiologic effect of vaginal cone application in continent and urinary stress incontinent women. Int Urogynecol J 6:204–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Luiz Amaro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gameiro, M.O., Moreira, E.H., Gameiro, F.O. et al. Vaginal weight cone versus assisted pelvic floor muscle training in the treatment of female urinary incontinence. A prospective, single-blind, randomized trial. Int Urogynecol J 21, 395–399 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1059-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1059-7

Keywords

Navigation