Skip to main content
Log in

Use of pelvic organ prolapse staging systems in published articles of selected specialized journals

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

A standardized system for reporting pelvic organ prolapse is important for clinical communication, patient follow-up, and meaningful comparisons between studies. In 1996, the description of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POPQ) was published. We hypothesized that its use in published articles of specialized journals would increase over time.

Methods

Articles from eight journals in 2004 and 2007 were included if any attempt to grade prolapse was mentioned. Reviews, editorials, and abstracts were excluded.

Results

Use of POPQ increased from 64.9% to 82.1% (p = 0.01) while other systems decreased. POPQ was used more frequently in the US than other countries. Urologists used POPQ less and Baden–Walker more frequently than other specialists.

Conclusions

Use of POPQ has increased in the period studied. This trend was observed in all the subgroups analyzed, showing that POPQ is being adopted as the universal language of prolapse in the published literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AJOG:

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

AUGS:

American Urogynecologic Association

BW:

Baden–Walker system

ICS:

International Continence Society

Int Urogynecol J:

International Urogynecology Journal

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

Neurourol&Urodyn:

Neurourology and Urodynamics

NS:

Not specified systems

Ob/Gyn:

Obstetrics and Gynecology

OS:

Other specified systems

POP:

Pelvic organ prolapse

POPQ:

Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system

SGS:

Society of Gynecologic Surgeons

US:

United States

References

  1. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(1):10–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Muir TW, Stepp KJ, Barber MD (2003) Adoption of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in peer-reviewed literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(6):1632–1635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Auwad W, Freeman RM, Swift S (2004) Is the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) being used? A survey of members of the International Continence Society (ICS) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 15(5):324–327

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Scotti RJ, Flora R, Greston WM, Budnick L, Hutchinson-Colas J (2000) Characterizing and reporting pelvic floor defects: the revised New York classification system. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 11(1):48–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vardy MD, Lindsay R, Scotti RJ, Mikhail M, Richart RM, Nieves J et al (2003) Short-term urogenital effects of raloxifene, tamoxifen and estrogen. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(1):81–88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Swift S, Morris S, McKinnie V, Freeman R, Petri E, Scotti RJ et al (2006) Validation of a simplified technique for using the POPQ pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17(6):615–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. de Barros Moreira Lemos NL, Flores Auge AP, Lunardelli JL, Brites Frade A, Frade CL, de Oliveira AL et al (2007) Optimizing pelvic organ prolapse research. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18(6):609–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Steele A, Mallipeddi P, Welgoss J, Soled S, Kohli N, Karram M (1998) Teaching the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179(6):1458–1463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Geiss IM, Riss PA, Hanzal E, Dungl A (2007) A simple teaching tool for training the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18(9):1003–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

No financial support was received for this study. Alejandro Treszezamsky, Lauren Rascoff, and Azin Shahryarinejad have no conflict of interest to report. Michael Vardy has received grant support from Astellas, has been a speaker for Astellas, GSK, and Wyeth, and has acted as a consultant for Astellas, Bard, and Wyeth.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandro Daniel Treszezamsky.

Additional information

No financial support was received for this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Treszezamsky, A.D., Rascoff, L., Shahryarinejad, A. et al. Use of pelvic organ prolapse staging systems in published articles of selected specialized journals. Int Urogynecol J 21, 359–363 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1044-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1044-1

Keywords

Navigation