Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validation of the Slovakian version of the P-QOL questionnaire

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

This study aimed to validate the Slovakian version of the prolapse quality-of-life (P-QOL) questionnaire.

Methods

The P-QOL questionnaire was translated into the Slovakian language and administered to women recruited from a urogynecology outpatient clinic at a tertiary referral teaching hospital. After completing a questionnaire, all women were examined in supine position using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP-Q) Quantification system. The reliability was assessed by using a 2-week test–retest analysis.

Results

Fifty symptomatic and 79 asymptomatic women were included. The score of P-QOL was strongly correlated with the vaginal examination findings among the symptomatic group (p < 0.001 in eight domains). P-QOL domain scores were significantly different between symptomatic and asymptomatic women. The test–retest reliability confirmed a highly significant correlation between the total scores for each domain (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The Slovakian version of the P-QOL questionnaire is a valid, reliable, and easily comprehensible instrument to assess quality of life of women with uterovaginal prolapse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyles SH, Weber AM, Myer L (2003) Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979–97. Obstet Gynecol 188:108–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Digesu AG, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Robinson D, Salvatore S (2005) P-QOL: a validation questionnaire to assess the symptoms and quality of life of women with urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 16:176–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Digesu GA, Santamato S, Khullar V, Santillo V, Digesu A, Cormio G et al (2003) Validation of an Italian version of the prolapse quality of life questionnaire. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 106:184–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. de Oliveira MS, Tamanini JT, de Aguiar Cavalcanti G (2009) Validation of the prolapse quality-of-life questionnaire (P-QoL) in Portuguese version in Brazilian women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:1191–1202. doi:10.1007/s00192-009-0934-6

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lenz F, Stammer H, Brocker K, Rak M, Scherg H, Sohn C (2009) Validation of a German version of the P-QOL Questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(6):641–649

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cam C, Sakalli M, Ay P, Aran T, Cam M, Karateke A (2007) Validation of the prolapse quality of life questionnaire (P-QOL) in a Turkish population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 135(1):132–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, Jo DeLancey, Klarskov P et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Digesu GA, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Robinson D (2008) Inter-observer reliability of digital vaginal examination using a four-grade scale in different patient positions. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1303–1307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lukacz ES, Lawrence JM, Buckwalter JG, Burchette RJ, Nager CHV, Luber KM (2005) Epidemiology of prolapse and incontinence questionnaire: validation of a new epidemiologic survey. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16:272–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L, Gonzalez J (2008) Is there a difference in patient and physician quality of life evaluation in pelvic organ prolapse? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:517–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tamanini JTN, Almeida FG, Girotti ME, Riccetto CLZ, Palma PCR, Rios LAS (2008) The Portuguese validation of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS) for Brazilian women with pelvic organ. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1385–1391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fayyad A, Hill S, Gurung V, Prashar S, Smith ARB (2007) How accurate is symptomatic and clinical evaluation of prolapse prior to surgical repair? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:1179–1183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Digesu GA, Salvatore S, Chaliha C, Athanasiou S, Milani R, Khullar V (2007) Do overactive bladder symptoms improve after repair of anterior vaginal wall prolapse? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18(12):1439–1443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U et al (2002) Standardisation sub-committee of the international continence society. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the international continence society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our thanks to the Gynecology Outpatient Departments of Krupova Maria MD, Krkoskova Katarina MD, Lackova-Krivusova Denisa MD, Bellan Branislav MD, and Reznakova Slavomira MD for their cooperation.

Funding

None

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Svihra.

Appendix

Appendix

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Svihrova, V., Digesu, G.A., Svihra, J. et al. Validation of the Slovakian version of the P-QOL questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J 21, 53–61 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0989-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0989-4

Keywords

Navigation