Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

St. Mark’s incontinence score for assessment of anal incontinence following obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between St. Mark’s incontinence score (SMIS) for anal incontinence and impact on quality of life (QoL), following primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). Three hundred sixty-eight women who sustained OASIS completed a Manchester Health Questionnaire (MHQ) and the clinician calculated a SMIS. Spearman’s correlation coefficients were calculated, and Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare different severity subgroups. Mean follow-up was 10 weeks and mean age was 30 years. Mean SMIS was 1.35. All MHQ QoL domains showed statistically significant positive correlation with SMIS. When comparing SMIS subgroups (0–4, 5–8, >8), mean QoL domain scores were higher with increasing SMIS. This shows that the objective assessment of severity of anal incontinence, using the SMIS, correlates to its impact on QoL in a relatively young population with low severity of symptoms and can, therefore, be used in women who sustain OASIS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perry S, Shaw C, McGrother C, Matthews RJ, Assassa RP, Dallosso H et al (2002) Prevalence of faecal incontinence in adults aged 40 years or more living in the community. Gut 50:480–484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA et al (1999) Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 44:77–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG et al (1999) Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1525–1532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pescatori M, Anastasio G, Bottini C et al (1992) New grading and scoring for anal incontinence. Evaluation of 335 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 35:482–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jorge JMN, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wong WD, Congliosi SM, Spencer MP, Corman ML, Tan P, Opelka FG et al (2002) The safety and efficacy of the artificial bowel sphincter for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1139–1153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Deutekom M, Terra MP, Dobben AC, Dijkgraaf MGW, Baeten CGMI, Stoker J et al (2005) Impact of faecal incontinence severity on health domains. Colorectal Dis 7:263–269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Maeda Y, Parés D, Norton C et al (2008) Does the St. Mark’s incontinence score reflect patients’ perceptions? A review of 390 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 51:436–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boreham MK, Richter HE, Kenton KS, Nager CW, Gregory WT, Aronson MP et al (2005) Anal incontinence in women presenting for gynaecologic care: prevalence, risk factors, and impact upon quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1637–1642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rothbarth J, Bemelman WA, Meijerink WJHJ, Stiggelbout AM, Zwinderman AH, Buyze-Westerweel ME et al (2001) What is the impact of fecal incontinence on quality of life? Dis Colon Rectum 44:67–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fenech DS, Takahashi T, Liu M, Spencer L, Swallow CJ, Cohen Z et al (2007) Function and quality of life after transanal excision of rectal polyps and cancers. Dis Colon Rectum 50:598–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lehur PA, Zerbib F, Neunlist M et al (2002) Comparison of quality of life and anorectal function after artificial sphincter implantation. Dis Colon Rectum 45:508–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pla-Martí V, Moro-Valdezate D, Alos-Company R et al (2007) The effect of surgery on quality of life in patients with faecal incontinence of obstetric origin. Colorectal Dis 9:90–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hatem M, Fraser W, Lepire E (2005) Postpartum urinary and anal incontinence: a population-based study of quality of life of primiparous women in Quebec. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 27:682–688

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Handa VL, Zyczynski HM, Burgio KL, Fitzgerald MP, Borello-France D, Jnaz NK et al (2007) The impact of fecal and urinary incontinence on quality of life 6 months after childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:636.e1–636.e6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bugg GJ, Kiff ES, Hosker G (2001) A new condition-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire for the assessment of women with anal incontinence. BJOG 108:1057–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sultan AH, Thakar R (2007) Third and fourth degree tears. In: Sultan AH, Thakar R, Fenner DE (eds) Perineal and anal sphincter trauma. Springer, London, pp 33–51

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Mahony R, Behan M, Daly L, Kirwan C, O’Herlihy C, O’Connell PR (2007) Internal anal sphincter defect influences continence outcome following obstetric anal sphincter injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196:217.e1–217.e5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdul H. Sultan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roos, AM., Sultan, A.H. & Thakar, R. St. Mark’s incontinence score for assessment of anal incontinence following obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). Int Urogynecol J 20, 407–410 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0784-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0784-7

Keywords

Navigation