Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The quantification of levator muscle resting tone by digital assessment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The biomechanical properties of the puborectalis muscle are likely to be important for pelvic organ support. However, neither elasticity nor its clinical correlate, muscle resting tone, have received much attention to date. We therefore conducted a prospective study to test a newly developed resting tone scale for validity and reproducibility. Ninety-eight patients underwent a physical examination including prolapse staging and palpation of the levator ani. They were also assessed by 4D translabial ultrasound for levator hiatal dimensions and prolapse assessment. Resting tone was negatively associated with anterior and posterior compartment prolapse. An independent test–retest series yielded a weighted kappa of 0.55 (CI 0.44–0.66), implying “moderate” repeatability. Resting tone of the puborectalis muscle can be determined by digital palpation. It is moderately repeatable and associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Palpation of resting tone may be a useful new tool for assessing women with pelvic floor dysfunction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ICS POP-Q:

International Continence Society Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification

MOS:

Modified Oxford Scale

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

PFMC:

Pelvic floor muscle contraction

References

  1. Lanzarone V, Dietz H (2007) Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the levator hiatus in late pregnancy and associations with delivery outcomes. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 47:176–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dietz H (2007) Does delayed childbearing increase the risk of levator injury in labour? Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 47:491–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dietz HP, Lanzarone V (2005) Levator trauma after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 106:707–712

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kearney R, Miller J, Ashton-Miller J, Delancey J (2006) Obstetric factors associated with levator ani muscle injury after vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol 107:144–149

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dietz H, Simpson J (2008) Levator trauma is associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 115:979–984

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dietz HP, Steensma AB (2006) The prevalence of major abnormalities of the levator ani in urogynaecological patients. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol 113:225–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dietz H, De Leon J, Shek K (2008) Ballooning of the levator hiatus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31(6):676–680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dietz H (2007) Quantification of major morphological abnormalities of the levator ani. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:329–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dietz H, Shek K, Clarke B (2005) Biometry of the pubovisceral muscle and levator hiatus by three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25:580–585

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Simons D, Mense S (1998) Understanding and measurement of muscle tone as related to clinical muscle pain. Pain 75:1–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Laycock J (1992) Assessment and treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction. Ph.D thesis, University of Bradford, Bradford

  12. Dietz HP, Jarvis SK, Vancaillie TG (2002) The assessment of levator muscle strength: a validation of three ultrasound techniques. Int Urogynecol J 13:156–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Thompson JA, O’Sullivan PB, Briffa K, Neumann P, Court S (2005) Assessment of pelvic floor movement using transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J 16:285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Neumann P, Grimmer-Somers K, Gill V, Grant R (2007) Rater reliability of pelvic floor muscle strength. Aust NZ Continence J 13:8–14

    Google Scholar 

  15. Frawley H (2006) Reliability of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment using different test positions and tools. Neurourol Urodyn 25:236–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Messelink B, Benson T, Berghmans B et al (2005) Standardization of terminology of pelvic floor muscle function and dysfunction: report from the Pelvic Floor Clinical Assessment Group of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 24:374–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Devreese AM, Staes F, De Weerdt W et al (2004) Clinical evaluation of pelvic floor muscle function in continent and incontinent women. Neurourol Urodyn 23:190–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Thyer I, Shek C, Dietz HP (2007) Clinical validation of a new imaging method for assessing pelvic floor biomechanics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:201–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Oerno A, Dietz H (2007) Levator co-activation is a significant confounder of pelvic organ descent on Valsalva maneuver. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:346–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Walsh E (1992) Muscles, masses and motion. Mac Keith, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  22. Guaderrama N, Liu J, Nager C et al (2006) Evidence for the innervation of pelvic floor muscles by the pudendal nerve. Obstet Gynecol 106:774–781

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yang J, Yang S, Huang W (2006) Biometry of the pubovisceral muscle and levator hiatus in nulliparous Chinese women. Ultrsound Obstet Gynecol 26:710–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported, in part, by the Betty Byrne Henderson Foundation, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, and by OZWAC (Australian Women and Children Research Foundation), Penrith, Australia.

Conflicts of interest

Hans Peter Dietz has received support in the form of loan equipment from ultrasound equipment manufacturers (GE Kretz, Toshiba, Bruel&Kjaer, and Phillips) and has received speakers’ honoraria from AMS, GE, and Astellas. He has acted as consultant for AMS and CCS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. P. Dietz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dietz, H.P., Shek, K.L. The quantification of levator muscle resting tone by digital assessment. Int Urogynecol J 19, 1489–1493 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0682-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0682-z

Keywords

Navigation