Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Visualization of the endopelvic fascia by transrectal three-dimensional ultrasound

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of our pilot study was to explore the feasibility of visualizing the endopelvic fascia by transrectal three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound. Transrectal 3D ultrasound was performed in 12 nulliparous women and 11 women with a history of vaginal delivery. A 6–10 MHz volume probe was used to examine the suburethral anterior vaginal wall. In all women, an echogenic layer was identified at an average of 3–5 mm from the vaginal surface. This echogenic layer was found to be contiguous to the lateral pelvic sidewall and uninterrupted in 10 of 12 nulliparous women, whereas gaps in this layer were identified in all 11 parous women. We hypothesize that this echogenic layer may represent the suburethral component of the endopelvic fascia. Depending on the number and localization of the interruptions in this echogenic layer, the mechanical support of the pelvic floor seems to be weakened corresponding to a higher incidence of descensus of the anterior vaginal wall, which frequently was associated with urinary incontinence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BN:

Bladder neck

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

SUI:

Stress urinary incontinence

3D:

Three-dimensional

References

  1. Enhörning G (1961) Simultaneous recording of the intravesical and intraurethral pressure. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 276:S1–S68

    Google Scholar 

  2. DeLancey JOL (1994) Structural support of the urethra as it relates to urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:1713–1723

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ulmsten U, Falconer C (1999) Connective tissue in female urinary incontinence. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 11:509–515

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jackson RA, Vittinghoff E, Kanaya AM, Miles TP, Resnick HE, Kritchevsky SB, Simonsick EM, Brown JS (2004) Urinary incontinence in elderly women: findings from the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study. Obstet Gynecol 104:301–307

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haderer JM, Pannu HK, Genadry R, Hutchins GM (2002) Controversies in female urethral anatomy and their significance for understanding urinary continence: observations and literature review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 13:236–252

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zacharin RF (1968) The anatomic support of the female urethra. Obstet Gynecol 32:754–759

    Google Scholar 

  7. Krantz KE (1951) The anatomy of the urethra and the anterior vaginal wall. Am J Obstet Gynecol 62:374–386

    Google Scholar 

  8. Arronson MP, Bates SM, Alison FJ, Chelmow D, Grannum RS (1995) Periurethral and paravaginal anatomy: an endovaginal magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:1702–1710

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chou Q, DeLancey JOL (2001) A structured system to evaluate urethral support anatomy in magnetic resonance image. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:44–50

    Google Scholar 

  10. DeSouza NM, Daniels OJ, Williams AD, Gilerdale DJ, Abel PD (2002) Female urinary genuine stress incontinence: anatomic considerations at MR imaging of the paravaginal fascia and urethra—initial observations. Radiology 225:433–439

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tunn R., DeLancey JOL, Quint EE (2001) Visibility of pelvic organ support structures in magnetic resonance images without an endovaginal coil. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:1156–1163

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wisser J, Schär G, Kurmanavicius J, Huch R, Huch A (1999) Use of 3D ultrasound as a new approach to assess obstetrical trauma to the pelvic floor. Ultraschall Med 20:15–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dietz HP, Steensma AB, Hastings R (2003) Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor: the effect of parturition on paravaginal support structures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21:589–595

    Google Scholar 

  14. Norton P (1993) Pelvic floor disorders: the role of fascia and ligaments. Clin Obstet Gynecol 36:926–937

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Richardson AC (1976) A new look at pelvic relaxation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 126:563–573

    Google Scholar 

  16. Burrows LJ, Sewell C, Leffler KS, Cundiff GW (2003) The accuracy of clinical evaluation of posterior vaginal wall defects. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14:160–163

    Google Scholar 

  17. Constantini E, Pjoncini C, Zucchi A, Lombi R, Bini V, Mearini E, Porena M (2003) Four-corner colposuspension: clinical and functional results. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14:113–118

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gynecology, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Schwestern, Seilerstätte 4, 4020, Linz, Austria

    Eva Reisinger & Wolfgang Stummvoll

Authors
  1. Eva Reisinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wolfgang Stummvoll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Stummvoll.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reisinger, E., Stummvoll, W. Visualization of the endopelvic fascia by transrectal three-dimensional ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J 17, 165–169 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-005-1298-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-005-1298-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation