Abstract
Forty women with stress incontinence, intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD), associated or not with urethral hypermobility, a Valsalva leak point pressure (VLLP) <60 cmH20 and a maximum urethral closure pressure <30 cmH20 underwent in situ vaginal wall sling. The main modification to the technique was the use of two small Marlex meshes placed at the lateral edges of the sling. Outcome was assessed by pad use, surgical results and patients’ satisfaction. Data of 39/40 patients were analyzed after a minimum follow-up of 1 year. After surgery 30/39 patients were completely dry (no pads), stress incontinence disappeared in 22/39, and 30/39 patients were satisfied with outcome. Reasons for dissatisfaction included recurrence of stress incontinence in three, infections in one and urge incontinence in five. Overall results are good given this category of patients. The vaginal wall sling can be recommended for patients with ISD because the results are promising, it corrects urethral hypermobility and, in our experience, it does not cause obstruction if correctly performed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Griebling TL, Berman CJ, Kreder KJ (1998) Fascia lata sling cystourethropexy for the management of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 9:165
Carr LK, Walsh PJ, Abraham VE, Webster G (1997) Favorable outcome of pubovaginal slings for geriatric women with stress incontinence. J Urol 157:125
Vasavada SP, Racley RR, Appell RA (1998) In situ anterior vaginal wall sling formation with preservation of the endopelvic fascia for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 9:379
Carbone JM, Kavaler E, Hu JC, Raz S (2001) Pubovaginal sling using cadaveric fascia and bone anchors: disappointing early results. J Urol 165:1605
Huang Y, Lyn ATL, Chen K, Pan C, Chang LS (2001) High failure rate using allograft fascia lata in pubovaginal sling surgery for female stress urinary incontinence. Urology 58:943
Fitzgerald MP, Mollenhauer J, Brubaker L (1999) Failure of allograft suburethral sling. BJU Int 84:785
Juma S, Little NA, Raz S (1992) Vaginal wall sling: four years later. Urology 39:424
Raz S, Stothers L, Young GPH, Short J, Marks B, Chopra A (1996) Vaginal wall sling for anatomical incontinence and intrinsic sphincter dysfunction: efficacy and outcome analysis. J Urol 156:166
Kaplan SA, Te AE, Young GPH, Andrade A, Cabelin MA, Ikeguchi EF (2000) Prospective analysis of 373 consecutive women with stress urinary incontinence treated with a vaginal wall sling: the Columbia-Cornell University experience. J Urol 164:1623
Maher CF, Dwyer PL, Carey MP, Moran PA (1999) Colposuspension or sling for low urethral pressure stress incontinence? Int Urogynecol J 10:384
Kaplan SA, Santarosa RP, Te AE (1996) Comparison of fascial and vaginal wall slings in the management of intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Urology 47:885
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167
Raz S, Erickson DR (1992) SEAPI-QMM incontinence classification system. Neurol Urodyn 11:187
Pajoncini C, Costantini E, Guercini F, Bini V, Porena M (2003) Clinical and urodynamic features of intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Neurourol Urodyn 22:264–268
Shumaker SA (1994) Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Quality of Life Research 3:291
Baden WF, Walker T (1992) Grading support loss: the Halfway system. In: Baden, Walker (eds) Surgical repair of vaginal defects. L.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, pp 13–23
Artibani W, Haab F, Hilton C (2002) Pelvic floor reconstruction. Eur Urol 42:(Curric Urol 1–11)
Haab F, Trockman BA, Zimmern PE, Leach G (1997) Results of pubovaginal sling for the treatment of intrinsic sphincteric deficiency determined by questionnaire analysis. J Urol 158:1738
Pajoncini C, Rosi P, Morcellini R, Costantini E, Mearini L, Porena M (1998) Guidelines for endocavitary ultrasound scan in SUI and pelvic floor disease. Neurourol Urodyn 17:372
Costantini E, Pajoncini C, Zucchi A, Lombi R, Bini V, Mearini E, Porena M (2003) Four-corner colposuspension: clinical and functional results. Int Urogynecol J 14:113–118
Costantini E, Lombi R, Micheli C, Parziani S, Porena M (1998) Colposacropexy with gore-tex mesh in marked vaginal and uterovaginal prolapse. Eur Urol 34:111–117
Flynn BJ, Yap WT (2002) Pubovaginal sling using allograft fascia lata versus autograft fascia for all types of stress urinary incontinence: 2-year minimum followup. J Urol 167:608
Kuo H (2001) Anatomical and functional results of pubovaginal sling procedure using polypropylene mesh for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 166:152
Su T, Huang J, Wang Y, Yang J, Wie H, Huang C (1999) Is modified in situ vaginal wall sling operation the treatment of choice for recurrent genuine stress incontinence? J Urol 162:2073
Goldman HB, Rackley RR, Appell RA (2001) The in situ anterior vaginal wall sling: predictors of success. J Urol 166:2259–2262
Choe JM, Kothandapani R, James L, Bowling D (2001) Autologous, cadaveric, and synthetic materials used in sling surgery: comparative biomechanical analysis. Urology 58:482
Leach GE, Dmochowski RR, Appell RA, Blaivas JG, Hadley HR, Luber KM, Mostwin JL, O’Donnell PD, Roehrborn CG (1997) Female stress urinary incontinence clinical guidelines panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 158:875
Choe J, Ogan K, Battino BS (2000) Antimicrobial mesh versus vaginal wall sling: a comparative outcomes analysis. J Urol 163:1829
Hassouna ME, Ghoniem GM (1999) Long-term outcome and quality of life after modified pubovaginal sling for intrinsic sphincteric deficiency. Urology 53:287
Litwiller SE, Nelson RS, Fone PD, Kim KB, Stone AR (1997) Vaginal wall sling: long term outcome analysis of factors contributing to patient satisfaction and surgical success. J Urol 157:1279
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. G. Boyd for the translation of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editorial Comment: The authors present a method for a modified vaginal wall sling for the treatment of urinary incontinence. The main modification to previous techniques was the use of two small Marlex meshes placed on the lateral edges of the in situ vaginal wall sling. Although the authors present acceptable cure rates with the procedure, they present a 29% incidence of post-operative urge or mixed urinary incontinence. The authors compared this procedure with allograft and autograft sling material, but do not compare it with synthetic material. They give no convincing argument that this procedure is superior to other modified sling procedures such as the TVT, which can be performed with comparable results and less morbidity.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Costantini, E., Mearini, L., Mearini, E. et al. Assessing outcome after a modified vaginal wall sling for stress incontinence with intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Int Urogynecol J 16, 138–146 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1173-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1173-5