Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of reliability and geometrical strength criteria in geodetic networks

  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

 The proper and optimal design and subsequent assessment of geodetic networks is an integral part of most surveying engineering projects. Optimization and design are carried out before the measurements are actually made. A geodetic network is designed and optimized in terms of high reliability and the results are compared with those obtained by the robustness analysis technique. The purpose of an optimal design is to solve for both the network configuration (first-order design) and observations accuracy (second-order design) in order to meet the desired criteria. For this purpose, an analytical method is presented for performing the first-order design, second-order design, and/or the combined design. In order to evaluate the geometrical strength of a geodetic network, the results of robustness analysis are displayed in terms of robustness in rotation, robustness in shear, and robustness in scale. Results showed that the robustness parameters were affected by redundancy numbers. The largest robustness parameters were due to the observations with minimum redundancy numbers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 14 August 2000 / Accepted: 2 January 2001

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seemkooei, A. Comparison of reliability and geometrical strength criteria in geodetic networks. Journal of Geodesy 75, 227–233 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900100170

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900100170

Navigation