Abstract.
Autocovariance prediction has been applied to attempt to improve polar motion and UT1-UTC predictions. The predicted polar motion is the sum of the least-squares extrapolation model based on the Chandler circle, annual and semiannual ellipses, and a bias fit to the past 3 years of observations and the autocovariance prediction of these extrapolation residuals computed after subtraction of this model from pole coordinate data. This prediction method has been applied also to the UT1-UTC data, from which all known predictable effects were removed, but the prediction error has not been reduced with respect to the error of the current prediction model. However, the results show the possibility of decreasing polar motion prediction errors by about 50 for different prediction lengths from 50 to 200 days with respect to the errors of the current prediction model. Because of irregular variations in polar motion and UT1-UTC, the accuracy of the autocovariance prediction does depend on the epoch of the prediction. To explain irregular variations in x, y pole coordinate data, time-variable spectra of the equatorial components of the effective atmospheric angular momentum, determined by the National Center for Environmental Prediction, were computed. These time-variable spectra maxima for oscillations with periods of 100–140 days, which occurred in 1985, 1988, and 1990 could be responsible for excitation of the irregular short-period variations in pole coordinate data. Additionally, time-variable coherence between geodetic and atmospheric excitation function was computed, and the coherence maxima coincide also with the greatest irregular variations in polar motion extrapolation residuals.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 22 October 1996 / Accepted: 16 September 1997
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kosek, W., McCarthy, D. & Luzum, B. Possible improvement of Earth orientation forecast using autocovariance prediction procedures. Journal of Geodesy 72, 189–199 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900050160
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900050160