Skip to main content
Log in

How to handle topography in practical geoid determination: three examples

  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

 Three different methods of handling topography in geoid determination were investigated. The first two methods employ the residual terrain model (RTM) remove–restore technique, yielding the quasigeoid, whereas the third method uses the classical Helmert condensation method, yielding the geoid. All three methods were used with the geopotential model Earth Gravity Model (1996) (EGM96) as a reference, and the results were compared to precise global positioning system (GPS) levelling networks in Scandinavia. An investigation of the Helmert method, focusing on the different types of indirect effects and their effects on the geoid, was also carried out. The three different methods used produce almost identical results at the 5-cm level, when compared to the GPS levelling networks. However, small systematic differences existed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 18 March 1999 / Accepted: 21 March 2000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Omang, O., Forsberg, R. How to handle topography in practical geoid determination: three examples. Journal of Geodesy 74, 458–466 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900000107

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900000107

Navigation